🌸
For All the Articles on the Atomic Bomb
the Credit is Given to ...
Anders Björkman M.Sc. - FRANCE
Naval Architect and Marine Engineer
https://heiwaco.tripod.com/bombpart1.htm
For All the Articles on the Atomic Bomb
the Credit is Given to ...
Anders Björkman M.Sc. - FRANCE
Naval Architect and Marine Engineer
https://heiwaco.tripod.com/bombpart1.htm
🌸
Firebombed or Nuked. - The Bikini Nuclear Test
Atom Bomb Don't Exist - Atomic B. Deception - Hiroshima HOAX
Hiroshima & Nagasaki - Nuke Atom Myth. - Nuclear Fission - Miles Mathis - Hoax
Radiation Today
🌸
G E R M A N - Atombomben Lüge - H U N G A R I A N - Atom Bomba Kitalálás
🌸
Firebombed or Nuked. - The Bikini Nuclear Test
Atom Bomb Don't Exist - Atomic B. Deception - Hiroshima HOAX
Hiroshima & Nagasaki - Nuke Atom Myth. - Nuclear Fission - Miles Mathis - Hoax
Radiation Today
🌸
G E R M A N - Atombomben Lüge - H U N G A R I A N - Atom Bomba Kitalálás
🌸
🌸
Pictures
https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2011/05/
🌸
Videos
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jOXslJFIft3d/
https://rumble.com/v182yf5-nuclear-hoax-nukes-do-not-exist.html
https://rumble.com/v1g9hjx-nuclear-hoax-truth-.html
https://rumble.com/vx95er-the-atomic-bomb-was-a-hoax-by-noel-joshua-hadley.html
https://rumble.com/v12eu3d-nukes-are-fake-some-links.html
https://rumble.com/v1mw853-have-you-heard-of-the-nuclear-hoax.html
🌸
Pictures
https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2011/05/
🌸
Videos
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jOXslJFIft3d/
https://rumble.com/v182yf5-nuclear-hoax-nukes-do-not-exist.html
https://rumble.com/v1g9hjx-nuclear-hoax-truth-.html
https://rumble.com/vx95er-the-atomic-bomb-was-a-hoax-by-noel-joshua-hadley.html
https://rumble.com/v12eu3d-nukes-are-fake-some-links.html
https://rumble.com/v1mw853-have-you-heard-of-the-nuclear-hoax.html
🌸
🌸
At 33 minutes.
They used magnesium bombs to create the flash.
On the ground they had a pulse device that created a mushroom cloud.
🌸
At 42 minutes.
How they did the tests ... videos of the men stacking the dynamite ...
45 minutes ... scientists swam in the nuclear pools ... held the uranium in their hands ...
🌸
Remember
that Hiroshima and Nagasaki are thriving today,
and it has only been 77 years. WHY?
🌸
77 years ago atomic bombs fell, contaminating Hiroshima and Nagasaki with radioactive
particles that should have made those cities uninhabitable for thousands of year.
The atomic bomb that detonated over Hiroshima used
Uranium-235,
while the Nagasaki bomb had
Plutonium-239.
🌸
The half-life of U-235 is
703 800 000 million years,
🌸
The half-life of Pu-239 is
24,100 years
🌸
In other words, once on the ground, they will be there for a very long time.
I asked for and received several pages from the Hiroshima Peace Museum regarding this issue.
"Today, the background radiation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki is the same
as the average amount of natural radiation present anywhere on Earth."
🌸
It is not enough to affect human health.
But, Little Boy over Hiroshima was only about 1% efficient,
so what happened to the 139 pounds of the U-235 that were particularized?
From all reports, the plume dissipated over land and sea.
Same for Nagasaki and the 12 pounds of Pu-239 particles.
There was a slight increase of leukemia in the Nagasaki region,
but no additional incidence of cancers anywhere in and around Hiroshima.
Thus, contrary to any kind of logical sense, the nuclear explosions immediately
killed 200,000 people.
🌸
These cities soon became safe, and are thriving today.
🌸
We can wonder why?
🌸
But with respect to the relative long-term danger of nuclear power plants versus ATOMIC BOMBS, another article mentioned that there is a lot more fissionable
material in the former compared to the latter.
For example, a 1000 MW reactor uses 50,000 pounds of enriched uranium/year and produces 54,000 pounds of waste, which keeps accumulating, so in a 20-year period, there should be more than a million pounds of radioactive material on site.
Little Boy had only 141 pounds of U-235, while Fat Man used 14 pounds of Pu-239.
🌸
At 33 minutes.
They used magnesium bombs to create the flash.
On the ground they had a pulse device that created a mushroom cloud.
🌸
At 42 minutes.
How they did the tests ... videos of the men stacking the dynamite ...
45 minutes ... scientists swam in the nuclear pools ... held the uranium in their hands ...
🌸
Remember
that Hiroshima and Nagasaki are thriving today,
and it has only been 77 years. WHY?
🌸
77 years ago atomic bombs fell, contaminating Hiroshima and Nagasaki with radioactive
particles that should have made those cities uninhabitable for thousands of year.
The atomic bomb that detonated over Hiroshima used
Uranium-235,
while the Nagasaki bomb had
Plutonium-239.
🌸
The half-life of U-235 is
703 800 000 million years,
🌸
The half-life of Pu-239 is
24,100 years
🌸
In other words, once on the ground, they will be there for a very long time.
I asked for and received several pages from the Hiroshima Peace Museum regarding this issue.
"Today, the background radiation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki is the same
as the average amount of natural radiation present anywhere on Earth."
🌸
It is not enough to affect human health.
But, Little Boy over Hiroshima was only about 1% efficient,
so what happened to the 139 pounds of the U-235 that were particularized?
From all reports, the plume dissipated over land and sea.
Same for Nagasaki and the 12 pounds of Pu-239 particles.
There was a slight increase of leukemia in the Nagasaki region,
but no additional incidence of cancers anywhere in and around Hiroshima.
Thus, contrary to any kind of logical sense, the nuclear explosions immediately
killed 200,000 people.
🌸
These cities soon became safe, and are thriving today.
🌸
We can wonder why?
🌸
But with respect to the relative long-term danger of nuclear power plants versus ATOMIC BOMBS, another article mentioned that there is a lot more fissionable
material in the former compared to the latter.
For example, a 1000 MW reactor uses 50,000 pounds of enriched uranium/year and produces 54,000 pounds of waste, which keeps accumulating, so in a 20-year period, there should be more than a million pounds of radioactive material on site.
Little Boy had only 141 pounds of U-235, while Fat Man used 14 pounds of Pu-239.
🌸
🌸
Marvin Minsky -
Thinking the Hiroshima bomb was a hoax.
🌸
The scientist, Marvin Minsky (1927-2016) was one of the pioneers of the field of Artificial Intelligence, having founded the MIT AI Lab in 1970.
Since the 1950s, his work involved trying to uncover human thinking processes
and replicate them in machines. [Listener: Christopher Sykes; date recorded: 2011]
🌸
TRANSCRIPT:
I don’t think it was an important part then, except
that since people were going to Japan and getting killed in this period it was a great relief.
And for several days after the news came out I was convinced that this was actually a… a hoax, because Hiroshima was a port city, and so I assumed that in fact somebody had equipped a barge with a few thousand tons of TNT, just as the cliché went, and they’d slipped this barge into the harbor, and then they flew a little airplane over and dropped something and set off this bomb.
And so I assumed this was a great trick for fooling the Japanese into thinking we had an atomic bomb. But Nagasaki wasn’t so accessible, so… I think many people must have wondered, why… why did we drop two bombs?
Why wasn’t one enough? My first thought was that it was to convince them that it wasn’t a hoax.
A few years later then, I met Oppenheimer for the first time when I was in graduate school at Princeton, and he was very hospitable … and tragic.
🌸
Marvin Minsky -
Thinking the Hiroshima bomb was a hoax.
🌸
The scientist, Marvin Minsky (1927-2016) was one of the pioneers of the field of Artificial Intelligence, having founded the MIT AI Lab in 1970.
Since the 1950s, his work involved trying to uncover human thinking processes
and replicate them in machines. [Listener: Christopher Sykes; date recorded: 2011]
🌸
TRANSCRIPT:
I don’t think it was an important part then, except
that since people were going to Japan and getting killed in this period it was a great relief.
And for several days after the news came out I was convinced that this was actually a… a hoax, because Hiroshima was a port city, and so I assumed that in fact somebody had equipped a barge with a few thousand tons of TNT, just as the cliché went, and they’d slipped this barge into the harbor, and then they flew a little airplane over and dropped something and set off this bomb.
And so I assumed this was a great trick for fooling the Japanese into thinking we had an atomic bomb. But Nagasaki wasn’t so accessible, so… I think many people must have wondered, why… why did we drop two bombs?
Why wasn’t one enough? My first thought was that it was to convince them that it wasn’t a hoax.
A few years later then, I met Oppenheimer for the first time when I was in graduate school at Princeton, and he was very hospitable … and tragic.
🌸
🌸
Educational Documents
from
Around the World
Educational Documents
from
Around the World
🌸
Professor Akio Nakatani - JAPAN
🌸
Death Object:
Exploding The Nuclear Weapons Hoax . PDF.
Download File
🌸
Professor Akio Nakatani - JAPAN
🌸
Death Object:
Exploding The Nuclear Weapons Hoax . PDF.
Download File
🌸
| Professor Akio Nakatani - JAPAN - Death Object: ​Exploding The Nuclear Weapons Hoax . PDF. |
| The Facts from Bikini .pdf - Miles Mathis - USA |
🌸
Anders Björkman M.Sc. - FRANCE
Naval Architect and Marine Engineer
https://heiwaco.tripod.com/bombpart1.htm
🌸
Articles from
Dr. Henry Makow's Website - CANADA
🌸
https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/07/nuclear-bombs-do-not-exist.html
https://henrymakow.com/2023/02/nuclear-bombs-not-dropped.html
https://henrymakow.com/2023/04/hiroshima--radiation-sickness-.html
🌸
"Ten countries in total have claimed to have nuclear weapons,
and this is actually the scary part of the hoax,
showing how major world governments collude."
🌸
Anders Björkman M.Sc. - FRANCE
Naval Architect and Marine Engineer
https://heiwaco.tripod.com/bombpart1.htm
🌸
Articles from
Dr. Henry Makow's Website - CANADA
🌸
https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/07/nuclear-bombs-do-not-exist.html
https://henrymakow.com/2023/02/nuclear-bombs-not-dropped.html
https://henrymakow.com/2023/04/hiroshima--radiation-sickness-.html
🌸
"Ten countries in total have claimed to have nuclear weapons,
and this is actually the scary part of the hoax,
showing how major world governments collude."
🌸
| ​Michael Palmer MD. Hiroshima Revisited .pdf |
🌸
Dr. Anna Von Reitz
Alaska Supreme Court
🌸
Dr. Anna Von Reitz ... Face the Liars and the Truth.pdf
Download File
Dr. Anna Von Reitz
Alaska Supreme Court
🌸
Dr. Anna Von Reitz ... Face the Liars and the Truth.pdf
Download File
🌸
Bruce Cathie - New Zealand
Mathematician
🌸
Bruce Cathie - New Zealand
Mathematician
🌸
For many years a New Zealand mathematician, Bruce Cathie,
maintained that a nuclear war could never happen.
'There were never any nuclear explosions'.
He has written six books on similar subjects.
maintained that a nuclear war could never happen.
'There were never any nuclear explosions'.
He has written six books on similar subjects.
🌸
Bruce Cathie - Books
Harmonic 33 (1968), ISBN 1-539-79723-6
Harmonic 288 - The Pulse of the Universe (1977), ISBN 1-976-21787-3
Harmonic 371244 - The Bridge to Infinity (1989), ISBN 0-922356-00-9
The Energy Grid (1990), ISBN 0-932813-44-5
The Harmonic Conquest of Space (1994), ISBN 0-646-21679-1
Harmonic 695 - The UFO and Anti-Gravity (1971), ISBN 0-589-00661-4
🌸
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Cathie
🌸
http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2011/11/bruce-cathie-on-harmonic-code-ufos-anti.html
🌸
Bruce Cathie - Books
Harmonic 33 (1968), ISBN 1-539-79723-6
Harmonic 288 - The Pulse of the Universe (1977), ISBN 1-976-21787-3
Harmonic 371244 - The Bridge to Infinity (1989), ISBN 0-922356-00-9
The Energy Grid (1990), ISBN 0-932813-44-5
The Harmonic Conquest of Space (1994), ISBN 0-646-21679-1
Harmonic 695 - The UFO and Anti-Gravity (1971), ISBN 0-589-00661-4
🌸
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Cathie
🌸
http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2011/11/bruce-cathie-on-harmonic-code-ufos-anti.html
🌸
🌸
In this video Bruce Cathie
explains the classified knowledge
behind the atomic bomb.
This is the esoteric science that all the ancient cultures understood and is even built within the Great Pyramid, where two sides measure to 1 arc second of movement of Earth's rotation.
It's related to scared geometry and setting up harmonic relationships between 3 points through pythagorean alignments which sets up standing waves or octaves between these harmonic nodes.
This is also related to the research of John Nelson who discovered that whenever the Sun was positioned exactly between Mercury and Jupiter (180) or Mercury and Saturn (180, and also when Venus was 90 degrees to Saturn the incident of large sunspots increased.
This is the information that is being used within the black projects and they stated to Cathie that they would have no problem assassinating people who get in their way. Cathie turned down their job offered as he thought that the human race deserved to know this information and stated they were no different to Nazi's and he told them so.
Bruce Cathie died June 2nd 2013.
🌸
In this video Bruce Cathie
explains the classified knowledge
behind the atomic bomb.
This is the esoteric science that all the ancient cultures understood and is even built within the Great Pyramid, where two sides measure to 1 arc second of movement of Earth's rotation.
It's related to scared geometry and setting up harmonic relationships between 3 points through pythagorean alignments which sets up standing waves or octaves between these harmonic nodes.
This is also related to the research of John Nelson who discovered that whenever the Sun was positioned exactly between Mercury and Jupiter (180) or Mercury and Saturn (180, and also when Venus was 90 degrees to Saturn the incident of large sunspots increased.
This is the information that is being used within the black projects and they stated to Cathie that they would have no problem assassinating people who get in their way. Cathie turned down their job offered as he thought that the human race deserved to know this information and stated they were no different to Nazi's and he told them so.
Bruce Cathie died June 2nd 2013.
🌸
🌸
https://tabublog.com/2015/04/21/no-nukes-were-dropped-on-hiroshima-and-nagasaki/
🌸
The Washington Post ...
The Washington Post uncritically noted that the atomic mission staff
had been unable to find any Japanese person suffering from radiation sickness. [22] (Source)
... according to the head of the US atomic mission to Japan the bomb
had not produced any “dangerous, lingering radioactivity.”
http://www.wagingpeace.org/nuclearism-and-the-legacy-of-u-s-media-coverage-of-hiroshima/
🌸
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/why-worry-about-fukushima_b_847250
🌸
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/five-myths-about-the-atomic-bomb/
🌸
https://tabublog.com/2015/04/21/no-nukes-were-dropped-on-hiroshima-and-nagasaki/
🌸
The Washington Post ...
The Washington Post uncritically noted that the atomic mission staff
had been unable to find any Japanese person suffering from radiation sickness. [22] (Source)
... according to the head of the US atomic mission to Japan the bomb
had not produced any “dangerous, lingering radioactivity.”
http://www.wagingpeace.org/nuclearism-and-the-legacy-of-u-s-media-coverage-of-hiroshima/
🌸
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/why-worry-about-fukushima_b_847250
🌸
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/five-myths-about-the-atomic-bomb/
🌸
🌸
See The Bikini Atoll Map
Today
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Bikini+Atoll/@
🌸
Radioactivity affects plants just as it affects animals,
so the island should be barren.
🌸
See The Bikini Atoll Map
Today
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Bikini+Atoll/@
🌸
Radioactivity affects plants just as it affects animals,
so the island should be barren.
🌸
🌸
Written by Miles Mathis
🌸
It was blasted 23 times.
🌸
Written by Miles Mathis
🌸
It was blasted 23 times.
🌸
"Remember, the Bikini Atoll wasn't said to be blasted by only Able and Baker.
It was blasted 23 times, including three of the biggest blasts ever from US testing:
the 4.5 megaton Navajo
the 5 megaton Tewa, in 1956;
and the 15 megaton Bravo in 1954.
Bravo was therefore 750 times more powerful than Baker.
Multiply the Baker mushroom by 750 times.
Since the average elevation of Bikini is only 7 feet above low tide, a blast that size inside the atoll would have sunk the entire island under a boiling sea of radiation.
They admit that the crater from Bravo on the sea floor “is 2,200 yards across and 80 yards deep, shaking islands more than 120 miles away.”
That's a crater more than a mile and a quarter across.
The heat created was almost 100,000 Fahrenheit,
which is 9 times hotter than the surface of the Sun.
The fireball was nearly five miles wide,
and the mushroom rose to 60 miles.
But get this: just 10 years after the last nuclear blast there in 1958, the original residents were allowed to go back to Bikini.
It was only after finding high levels of Strontium 90 in crabs that they were removed again.
I beg you to read that closely, since it is stated in just that way at Wikipedia.
They wanted to go back, they did go back, and the only reason they couldn't stay was because of radiation tests on crabs?
You have to be kidding me!
The place should have looked worse than the surface of the Moon and been completely uninhabitable. "
It was blasted 23 times, including three of the biggest blasts ever from US testing:
the 4.5 megaton Navajo
the 5 megaton Tewa, in 1956;
and the 15 megaton Bravo in 1954.
Bravo was therefore 750 times more powerful than Baker.
Multiply the Baker mushroom by 750 times.
Since the average elevation of Bikini is only 7 feet above low tide, a blast that size inside the atoll would have sunk the entire island under a boiling sea of radiation.
They admit that the crater from Bravo on the sea floor “is 2,200 yards across and 80 yards deep, shaking islands more than 120 miles away.”
That's a crater more than a mile and a quarter across.
The heat created was almost 100,000 Fahrenheit,
which is 9 times hotter than the surface of the Sun.
The fireball was nearly five miles wide,
and the mushroom rose to 60 miles.
But get this: just 10 years after the last nuclear blast there in 1958, the original residents were allowed to go back to Bikini.
It was only after finding high levels of Strontium 90 in crabs that they were removed again.
I beg you to read that closely, since it is stated in just that way at Wikipedia.
They wanted to go back, they did go back, and the only reason they couldn't stay was because of radiation tests on crabs?
You have to be kidding me!
The place should have looked worse than the surface of the Moon and been completely uninhabitable. "
🌸
In the photosphere, temperatures reach about 10,000 degrees F (5,500 degrees C)
according to the educational website ...
https://www.thesuntoday.org/sun/solar-structure/
It is here that the sun's radiation is detected as visible light. Sunspots on the photosphere appear dark because they are cooler than the other parts of the sun's surface.
The temperature of sunspots can be as low as 5,400 to 8,100 degrees F (3,000 to 4,500
degrees C) according to the University Corporation of Atmospheric Research (UCAR)
The chromosphere lies above the photosphere and temperatures range from approximately 11,000 degrees F (6,000 degrees C) nearest the photosphere to about 7,200 degrees F (4,000 degrees C) a couple of hundred miles higher up.
according to the educational website ...
https://www.thesuntoday.org/sun/solar-structure/
It is here that the sun's radiation is detected as visible light. Sunspots on the photosphere appear dark because they are cooler than the other parts of the sun's surface.
The temperature of sunspots can be as low as 5,400 to 8,100 degrees F (3,000 to 4,500
degrees C) according to the University Corporation of Atmospheric Research (UCAR)
The chromosphere lies above the photosphere and temperatures range from approximately 11,000 degrees F (6,000 degrees C) nearest the photosphere to about 7,200 degrees F (4,000 degrees C) a couple of hundred miles higher up.
🌸
🌸
The Bikini Atoll Nuclear Tests were Faked
by Miles Mathis
🌸
The Bikini Atoll Nuclear Tests were Faked
by Miles Mathis
🌸
The first Bikini Atoll nuclear tests took place in 1946, we are told.
The Bikini Atoll is part of the Marshall Islands in the East Indies. The tests were the first since the bombs dropped in Japan in 1945. Two tests took place, called Able and Baker. Both were about 23 kilotonnes. For reference, the bomb dropped on Hiroshima was said to be 15 kt. They were detonated just 3.5 miles or 5.6 kilometers from shore.
The Bikini Atoll is part of the Marshall Islands in the East Indies. The tests were the first since the bombs dropped in Japan in 1945. Two tests took place, called Able and Baker. Both were about 23 kilotonnes. For reference, the bomb dropped on Hiroshima was said to be 15 kt. They were detonated just 3.5 miles or 5.6 kilometers from shore.
🌸
🌸
The first strange thing to note is that the encyclopedia sites can't figure out when either test took place. On the same page, Wikipedia tells us they took place on June 30 and July 24, or July 1 and July 25. It looks like they could not get the story straight, after 68 years. I will be told that one is local time and one is UTC, but we don't need both times. Choose one.
Since we have photos of both detonations, it is easy to study the two for continuity. Unfortunately, there is no continuity. The second photo disproves the first.
Here is Able, which took place first:
Since we have photos of both detonations, it is easy to study the two for continuity. Unfortunately, there is no continuity. The second photo disproves the first.
Here is Able, which took place first:
🌸
🌸
Here is Baker, 24 days later:
🌸
🌸
We will look at the ships in close-up in a moment, but the first thing you should notice is the little huts on the shore, and the palm trees.
🌸
🌸
That is a close-up of Baker. Also notice the little sunning deck, about 10 feet out in shallow water. Doesn't look too sturdy, does it? So how did these wicker structures survive the first blast? The little trees didn't lose a leaf after the Able detonation. Compare that tree near center to the same tree pre- Able. Exactly the same fronds in the same positions.
You will say the tree on the far right has lost all its fronds, but check the Able photo again: it didn't have any to begin with. A real nuclear bomb detonated that nearby should have caused not only a tsunami, swamping this entire beach, it should have also caused a heavy wind.
You will say the tree on the far right has lost all its fronds, but check the Able photo again: it didn't have any to begin with. A real nuclear bomb detonated that nearby should have caused not only a tsunami, swamping this entire beach, it should have also caused a heavy wind.
🌸
🌸
The Nevada Trinity test picture,
with the wind ripping across the film sites miles away.
🌸
The Nevada Trinity test picture,
with the wind ripping across the film sites miles away.
🌸
Those soldiers are said to be six miles from the blast, so the beach at Bikini Atoll was about twice as close. You can watch the wind from the Nevada Trinity blast here. [Trinity's detonation was about the
same size as Able and Baker.]
There you can see the surge that should have been caused in both water and air by the Able and Baker detonations. And yet somehow that beach on the Bikini Atoll is exactly the same before and after the Able detonation.
I also urge you to study the black and white stripes painted on the trees in the Able and Baker photos. What are those for, you should ask. They are there to measure the water surge. The stripes act as a simple flood meter.
same size as Able and Baker.]
There you can see the surge that should have been caused in both water and air by the Able and Baker detonations. And yet somehow that beach on the Bikini Atoll is exactly the same before and after the Able detonation.
I also urge you to study the black and white stripes painted on the trees in the Able and Baker photos. What are those for, you should ask. They are there to measure the water surge. The stripes act as a simple flood meter.
🌸
🌸
So the people involved apparently want you to think they are expecting a surge, but then they forget to fake the signs of one. If there had been a surge after Able, we should see some sign of it in the Baker photo. But we don't. No lines appear on the trees. Even more damning is that we see no sand piled up in front of the trees (toward the beach). If there had been any wave caused by the blast, the sand would have piled up around the trunk of the tree.
You will say, “No, no, they swept that all away, to start fresh for the second test.” Right. And did they also rebuild the little structures in exactly the same configuration and same place, down to matching the sticks and the holes in the roofs?
Now let's look at the ships. This is a close-up of Baker, taken from a 5137 x 2696px photo, so it has a lot of resolution.
You will say, “No, no, they swept that all away, to start fresh for the second test.” Right. And did they also rebuild the little structures in exactly the same configuration and same place, down to matching the sticks and the holes in the roofs?
Now let's look at the ships. This is a close-up of Baker, taken from a 5137 x 2696px photo, so it has a lot of resolution.
🌸
🌸
I copied that with enough resolution that you can zoom in even more in this pdf if you want to. If you think those black ships look real, I don't know what to say. They shouldn't be black, for a start. The nearer ships are lit from this side, so why aren't the bigger ships? But an even better question is this: if you think they are black because they have been charred by the blast, tell me why they weren't swamped by the blast?
Why are they just sitting there upright? Again, they should have been hit by a strong surge in both air and water. Whoever faked this photo has tried to indicate the surge by whitening the water out in a circle, but the surge should be far stronger than that. As we see from the Trinity blasts, the detonation shouldn't just throw water and air up, it should also throw both water and air out to all sides. A wave should be coming right at us here, in both water and air. So this photo has no continuity with the Trinity films, as well as no continuity with physics or logic.
Remember, Baker was detonated underwater—halfway down to the sea floor—so why would it create this gigantic water spout up, but no wave to the side? We should see a large concentric water wave moving out from the blast, but we don't.
When that huge spout of water and sea-floor sediment that we see going up came back down, we would get a second gigantic wave, possibly even larger than the first. And yet we are told that only 10 of 78 ships in the area were sunk. That makes no sense.
You will say that none of the stuff going up will come down, since it is all vaporized. But the stuff in the spout isn't vapor. If it were vapor, it would look like the vapor above it. That is vapor. We don't know what the stuff in the spout is, but to me it looks like a cat's scratching post. Let's zoom in a bit more:
Why are they just sitting there upright? Again, they should have been hit by a strong surge in both air and water. Whoever faked this photo has tried to indicate the surge by whitening the water out in a circle, but the surge should be far stronger than that. As we see from the Trinity blasts, the detonation shouldn't just throw water and air up, it should also throw both water and air out to all sides. A wave should be coming right at us here, in both water and air. So this photo has no continuity with the Trinity films, as well as no continuity with physics or logic.
Remember, Baker was detonated underwater—halfway down to the sea floor—so why would it create this gigantic water spout up, but no wave to the side? We should see a large concentric water wave moving out from the blast, but we don't.
When that huge spout of water and sea-floor sediment that we see going up came back down, we would get a second gigantic wave, possibly even larger than the first. And yet we are told that only 10 of 78 ships in the area were sunk. That makes no sense.
You will say that none of the stuff going up will come down, since it is all vaporized. But the stuff in the spout isn't vapor. If it were vapor, it would look like the vapor above it. That is vapor. We don't know what the stuff in the spout is, but to me it looks like a cat's scratching post. Let's zoom in a bit more:
🌸
🌸
First, study the edge of the spout, where it meets the background. Doesn't look right, does it? It looks like one photo was superimposed on top of another, sort of like they do with greenscreen now.
Next, stare at the spout itself for a moment. Looks a lot like carpet, doesn't it? Is that a nuclear spout, or a cat's scratching post?
Next, stare at the spout itself for a moment. Looks a lot like carpet, doesn't it? Is that a nuclear spout, or a cat's scratching post?
🌸
🌸
That's one brave kitty cat. And this gives a whole new meaning to “carpet bombing.” Here's another picture of the Baker detonation:
🌸
🌸
So many problems there it is hard to know where to start. First of all, the spout doesn't match the other spout. The spout here is larger at the bottom and tapers up; the other doesn't. This spout is surrounded by white foam; the other isn't. If you answer that this photo is a few seconds later, allowing these things to change and develop, then you have to answer this, too: How did the white cloud above get smaller?
If this is a few seconds later, allowing the white foam below to develop, why hasn't the vapor cloud above expanded? The top of the cloud, containing the broccoli shapes, has expanded, so why would the white vapor halo beneath that have contracted? They forgot to match the photos to one another.
The ships here are also too big. We are at least three times farther away, but the ships next to the foam haven't diminished in size proportionally. Another problem is the fall-off of light from right to left across the photo. See how the right side is bright and the left side is dark? Whoever faked this photo was trying to match the shadows on the sailors, which—as we can see—fall to the left. The sailors are bright to the right and dark to the left.
But there wouldn't be a shadow on the ocean as a whole. The sun to the right won't cast a shadow to the left on the ocean! Just go outside in a field or on the beach or on the ocean or on a lake, in the morning or evening when the sun is to your right. Then see if it is darker overall to your left. I will tell you: it isn't.
Finally, we have sailors watching without protective clothing, goggles, or—in at least one case—a shirt. Even if these guys are ten miles out, this makes no sense. The blast is traveling out through the air. The expanding event doesn't magically stop ten miles out, or even twenty, and they knew that at the time. Do you honestly think they knew enough about radiation and fission to build a successful bomb, but not enough to know how the event would travel through air?
If this is a few seconds later, allowing the white foam below to develop, why hasn't the vapor cloud above expanded? The top of the cloud, containing the broccoli shapes, has expanded, so why would the white vapor halo beneath that have contracted? They forgot to match the photos to one another.
The ships here are also too big. We are at least three times farther away, but the ships next to the foam haven't diminished in size proportionally. Another problem is the fall-off of light from right to left across the photo. See how the right side is bright and the left side is dark? Whoever faked this photo was trying to match the shadows on the sailors, which—as we can see—fall to the left. The sailors are bright to the right and dark to the left.
But there wouldn't be a shadow on the ocean as a whole. The sun to the right won't cast a shadow to the left on the ocean! Just go outside in a field or on the beach or on the ocean or on a lake, in the morning or evening when the sun is to your right. Then see if it is darker overall to your left. I will tell you: it isn't.
Finally, we have sailors watching without protective clothing, goggles, or—in at least one case—a shirt. Even if these guys are ten miles out, this makes no sense. The blast is traveling out through the air. The expanding event doesn't magically stop ten miles out, or even twenty, and they knew that at the time. Do you honestly think they knew enough about radiation and fission to build a successful bomb, but not enough to know how the event would travel through air?
🌸
🌸
Even if they were so stupid or careless they couldn't figure that out from equations, the earlier tests in Nevada would have told them that. The mushroom in Nevada was said to have traveled out many dozens of miles, and that was just the visible cloud. This was also after the events in Japan, where they tell us they saw the effects of radiation firsthand. So you have to be an idiot to accept this picture as real.
Here's a third photo of the Baker event, from the air:
As you can see, it doesn't match either of the previous two. The overall shape of the halo is completely different in all three photos. Beyond that, the ambient cloud cover isn't even close to matching. Here we have a very few tiny wispy clouds. In the second picture, we had lots of medium sized cumulus clouds. And in the first picture, we had a mostly cloudy sky.
You will tell me that in the previous pictures, we see signs that the blast blew the local clouds out of the near vicinity. In the first picture, we saw some clearing above the blast. But it has to be one or the other: either the blast will clear the clouds or it won't.
There is no halfway, as we see in this last photo. We should have a super strong wind, right? If the clouds are blown away, you wouldn't expect to see a few wispy, very light clouds remaining. How did these little clouds dodge the wind?
For more proof, we can go to Google. You can get a picture of the Bikini Atoll today from Google Earth.
Here's a third photo of the Baker event, from the air:
As you can see, it doesn't match either of the previous two. The overall shape of the halo is completely different in all three photos. Beyond that, the ambient cloud cover isn't even close to matching. Here we have a very few tiny wispy clouds. In the second picture, we had lots of medium sized cumulus clouds. And in the first picture, we had a mostly cloudy sky.
You will tell me that in the previous pictures, we see signs that the blast blew the local clouds out of the near vicinity. In the first picture, we saw some clearing above the blast. But it has to be one or the other: either the blast will clear the clouds or it won't.
There is no halfway, as we see in this last photo. We should have a super strong wind, right? If the clouds are blown away, you wouldn't expect to see a few wispy, very light clouds remaining. How did these little clouds dodge the wind?
For more proof, we can go to Google. You can get a picture of the Bikini Atoll today from Google Earth.
🌸
That's dated 2013, not 1945. We are told the locals can't live there now because of radioactivity, but we see at least three proofs against that. One, we see lots of plant life both on and offshore. Radioactivity affects plants just as it affects animals, so the island should be barren. Remember, the Bikini Atoll wasn't said to be blasted by only Able and Baker. It was blasted 23 times, including three of the biggest blasts ever from US testing: the 4.5 megaton Navajo and the 5 megaton Tewa, in 1956; and the 15 megaton Bravo in 1954.
Bravo was therefore 750 times more powerful than Baker. Multiply the Baker mushroom by 750 times. Since the average elevation of Bikini is only 7 feet above low tide, a blast that size inside the atoll would have sunk the entire island under a boiling sea of radiation. They admit that the crater from Bravo on the sea floor “is 2,200 yards across and 80 yards deep, shaking islands more than 120 miles away.” That's a crater more than a mile and a quarter across. The heat created was almost 100,000o F, which is 9 times hotter than the surface of the Sun. The fireball was nearly five miles wide, and the mushroom rose to 60 miles.
But get this: just 10 years after the last nuclear blast there in 1958, the original residents were allowed to go back to Bikini. It was only after finding high levels of Strontium 90 in crabs that they were removed again. I beg you to read that closely, since it is stated in just that way at Wikipedia. They wanted to go back, they did go back, and the only reason they couldn't stay was because of radiation tests on crabs? You have to be kidding me! The place should have looked worse than the surface of the Moon and been completely uninhabitable.
The natives would have burst into tears and told the ship to turn around and get them out of there. Instead, they landed and began living there, only to be removed after tests. We are told that crops were replanted in 1968, and grew!
Beyond that, we see something is planted there in rows. Who planted it? Does that seem like a good place to plant a crop? Do you think that crop was planted by guys in radiation suits?
Finally, look at all the well maintained roads. Do you think those are left over from 56 years ago? I will be told the US Army is using the Atoll to test radiation-tolerant plants. If so, the test looks incredibly successful. Whatever they have injected into the plants and soil they should inject into themselves, to make radiation-tolerant people.
Oh, and don't forget the radiation-tolerant cat:
In 2008, the Daily Mail in London admitted that sea life in and around the atoll is abundant, with huge coral trees growing underwater and schools of fish swimming in the mile-wide Bravo “crater.” What's more, Wikipedia admits that diving tours have been given there since 1998. Do they swim in lead suits? Oh, they don't need to because nuclear contamination can't move through sea water, and doesn't last for decades. Wrong.
Just ask yourself this: is that what they are telling you about Fukushima: the sea water is blocking all release of radiation and it will only last a few years? No. If that were the case, Los Alamos National Laboratory could just throw all its high-level waste into the oceans. Why do you think they go to the trouble of burying that waste at great depths in unpopulated areas? Because according to the mainstream story, it will be hot for centuries.
High-level waste has a very long half- life, and while it is true that decommissioned bombs aren't said to be as big a problem, it isn't decommissioned bombs were are talking about here. It is exploded bombs. In exploded bombs—as in reactor cores—very high heats have been created, as well as large amount of fission. Over 42 megatons of fission yield were detonated in Bikini from 1946 to 1958. It is for this reason that the stories don't add up.
We are being told many contradictory things. If all these giant hydrogen bombs had actually been detonated there, the Bikini Atoll should not be now be green and cultivated, the coral and fish should not thrive there, no diving tours should be given there, and no natives should have ever returned, even for a moment.
Also consider this: if the Bravo blast had really created surface temperatures of 100,000F in a fireball five miles wide, that heat would have to dissipate in all directions, through all media. The sea would have boiled for many miles and the atmosphere would have been scorched for many more. The landmass of the Atoll would have been in or near the edge of that initial fireball, so we should ask what happens to land that is heated to that degree.
Even if the temperature had dropped by a factor of ten at that distance from center, that would still indicate a temperature of the land of 10,000F, which is the temperature they now give to the core of the Earth. If you heat land to that temperature and then let it cool, you wouldn't expect it to just return to its original form, would you?
If you heat sand and rocks and dirt to that temperature, it melts. In fact, it melts at about 1/5th that temperature, creating magma. When it cools, it is then igneous rock. But the surface of the Bikini Atoll is still limestone and sand. Limestone melts at 1,500F, which is 67 times cooler than the temperature said to be created by Bravo. Sand normally melts at above 2,000F, so we should also see the beaches at Bikini turned to glass. We don't.
So what does this faking indicate? I would say it indicates one of two things*: either the entire nuclear program has been faked to keep your ass under the desk, ducked and covered; or the nuclear program is real but our military didn't wish to cause this amount of real destruction on our lovely home planet Earth. Those who are familiar with the scruples of the military wouldn't bet on the second possibility, seeming to leave us with the first. However, the second possibility may have a variation: perhaps the military wasn't allowed to run these tests.
That implies someone or something which has the power to disallow the military from doing things, which leads us into other problems. I will leave that problem unsolved for now, only giving you a pointer, which is this: either someone behind our own government is more benevolent than we think, or someone behind the Russian government is more benevolent (and powerful) than we think, or the apparent benevolence we see here comes from some hidden third party. Whatever explanation you choose to embrace should give you a surge of hope.
Things may be bad, but they may not be quite as bad as the story we have been sold. The fact that our government has long been faking so many events gives you no reason to trust them, but it beats the hell of the events being real. Given the choice of an honest government and terrible real events or a dishonest government and terrible fake events, I will take the second any day.
*I will be told there is a third possibility: they wanted pictures to act as propaganda, but couldn't shield the film from gamma radiation, even ten miles out. So the events were real but they had to fake the pictures.
That explanation may hold near ground zero, where no film (especially video) camera could possibly work. But at a distance of many miles, that explanation falls apart. Ionizing radiation from a blast is said to be only 5% of the total energy, which drops by the square with distance.
So while you wouldn't want to be standing there for any amount of time, a camera with a fast shutter speed should have a high probability of capturing some visible light without also capturing a fatal gamma ray. The Russian's Tsar Bomba picture was taken 100 miles out, so they shouldn't have had to fake that. But they did.
Bravo was therefore 750 times more powerful than Baker. Multiply the Baker mushroom by 750 times. Since the average elevation of Bikini is only 7 feet above low tide, a blast that size inside the atoll would have sunk the entire island under a boiling sea of radiation. They admit that the crater from Bravo on the sea floor “is 2,200 yards across and 80 yards deep, shaking islands more than 120 miles away.” That's a crater more than a mile and a quarter across. The heat created was almost 100,000o F, which is 9 times hotter than the surface of the Sun. The fireball was nearly five miles wide, and the mushroom rose to 60 miles.
But get this: just 10 years after the last nuclear blast there in 1958, the original residents were allowed to go back to Bikini. It was only after finding high levels of Strontium 90 in crabs that they were removed again. I beg you to read that closely, since it is stated in just that way at Wikipedia. They wanted to go back, they did go back, and the only reason they couldn't stay was because of radiation tests on crabs? You have to be kidding me! The place should have looked worse than the surface of the Moon and been completely uninhabitable.
The natives would have burst into tears and told the ship to turn around and get them out of there. Instead, they landed and began living there, only to be removed after tests. We are told that crops were replanted in 1968, and grew!
Beyond that, we see something is planted there in rows. Who planted it? Does that seem like a good place to plant a crop? Do you think that crop was planted by guys in radiation suits?
Finally, look at all the well maintained roads. Do you think those are left over from 56 years ago? I will be told the US Army is using the Atoll to test radiation-tolerant plants. If so, the test looks incredibly successful. Whatever they have injected into the plants and soil they should inject into themselves, to make radiation-tolerant people.
Oh, and don't forget the radiation-tolerant cat:
In 2008, the Daily Mail in London admitted that sea life in and around the atoll is abundant, with huge coral trees growing underwater and schools of fish swimming in the mile-wide Bravo “crater.” What's more, Wikipedia admits that diving tours have been given there since 1998. Do they swim in lead suits? Oh, they don't need to because nuclear contamination can't move through sea water, and doesn't last for decades. Wrong.
Just ask yourself this: is that what they are telling you about Fukushima: the sea water is blocking all release of radiation and it will only last a few years? No. If that were the case, Los Alamos National Laboratory could just throw all its high-level waste into the oceans. Why do you think they go to the trouble of burying that waste at great depths in unpopulated areas? Because according to the mainstream story, it will be hot for centuries.
High-level waste has a very long half- life, and while it is true that decommissioned bombs aren't said to be as big a problem, it isn't decommissioned bombs were are talking about here. It is exploded bombs. In exploded bombs—as in reactor cores—very high heats have been created, as well as large amount of fission. Over 42 megatons of fission yield were detonated in Bikini from 1946 to 1958. It is for this reason that the stories don't add up.
We are being told many contradictory things. If all these giant hydrogen bombs had actually been detonated there, the Bikini Atoll should not be now be green and cultivated, the coral and fish should not thrive there, no diving tours should be given there, and no natives should have ever returned, even for a moment.
Also consider this: if the Bravo blast had really created surface temperatures of 100,000F in a fireball five miles wide, that heat would have to dissipate in all directions, through all media. The sea would have boiled for many miles and the atmosphere would have been scorched for many more. The landmass of the Atoll would have been in or near the edge of that initial fireball, so we should ask what happens to land that is heated to that degree.
Even if the temperature had dropped by a factor of ten at that distance from center, that would still indicate a temperature of the land of 10,000F, which is the temperature they now give to the core of the Earth. If you heat land to that temperature and then let it cool, you wouldn't expect it to just return to its original form, would you?
If you heat sand and rocks and dirt to that temperature, it melts. In fact, it melts at about 1/5th that temperature, creating magma. When it cools, it is then igneous rock. But the surface of the Bikini Atoll is still limestone and sand. Limestone melts at 1,500F, which is 67 times cooler than the temperature said to be created by Bravo. Sand normally melts at above 2,000F, so we should also see the beaches at Bikini turned to glass. We don't.
So what does this faking indicate? I would say it indicates one of two things*: either the entire nuclear program has been faked to keep your ass under the desk, ducked and covered; or the nuclear program is real but our military didn't wish to cause this amount of real destruction on our lovely home planet Earth. Those who are familiar with the scruples of the military wouldn't bet on the second possibility, seeming to leave us with the first. However, the second possibility may have a variation: perhaps the military wasn't allowed to run these tests.
That implies someone or something which has the power to disallow the military from doing things, which leads us into other problems. I will leave that problem unsolved for now, only giving you a pointer, which is this: either someone behind our own government is more benevolent than we think, or someone behind the Russian government is more benevolent (and powerful) than we think, or the apparent benevolence we see here comes from some hidden third party. Whatever explanation you choose to embrace should give you a surge of hope.
Things may be bad, but they may not be quite as bad as the story we have been sold. The fact that our government has long been faking so many events gives you no reason to trust them, but it beats the hell of the events being real. Given the choice of an honest government and terrible real events or a dishonest government and terrible fake events, I will take the second any day.
*I will be told there is a third possibility: they wanted pictures to act as propaganda, but couldn't shield the film from gamma radiation, even ten miles out. So the events were real but they had to fake the pictures.
That explanation may hold near ground zero, where no film (especially video) camera could possibly work. But at a distance of many miles, that explanation falls apart. Ionizing radiation from a blast is said to be only 5% of the total energy, which drops by the square with distance.
So while you wouldn't want to be standing there for any amount of time, a camera with a fast shutter speed should have a high probability of capturing some visible light without also capturing a fatal gamma ray. The Russian's Tsar Bomba picture was taken 100 miles out, so they shouldn't have had to fake that. But they did.
🌸
| Bikini.pdf |
🌸
🌸
🌸
The Above Picture is Tokyo
NAPALM carpet bombings in 1945
🌸
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2020/03/09/commentary/japan-commentary/march-1945-
🌸
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed spring 1945
also by standard napalm carpet bombings.
🌸
https://tabublog.com/2015/04/21/no-nukes-were-dropped-on-hiroshima-and-nagasaki/
🌸
The Above Picture is Tokyo
NAPALM carpet bombings in 1945
🌸
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2020/03/09/commentary/japan-commentary/march-1945-
🌸
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed spring 1945
also by standard napalm carpet bombings.
🌸
https://tabublog.com/2015/04/21/no-nukes-were-dropped-on-hiroshima-and-nagasaki/
🌸
🌸
The Atom Bomb Hoax
Was Hiroshima Firebombed and Not Nuked?
Was Hiroshima Firebombed and Not Nuked?
- Björkman, A. (2023) My Atomic Bomb Findings: The grand manipulation 1945-2023.
- Nakatani, A. (2017) Death Object: Exploding the Nuclear Weapons Hoax (CreateSpace).
- Palmer, M. (2020) Hiroshima revisited: the evidence that napalm and mustard gas helped fake the atomic bombings.
- Valota, A. et al. (2003) Modelling study on the protective role of OH radical scavengers and DNA higher-order structures in induction of single- and double-strand break by gamma-radiation. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 79:643-53
- Groves, L.R. (1962) Now it can be told (Harper & Row).
- Hewlett, R.G. and Anderson, O.E. (1962) The New World, 1939/1946 / A History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission (Pennsylvania State University Press).
- Arneson, R.G. (1945) Notes of the Interim Committee meeting, Thursday, 31 May 1945.
- Alperovitz, G. (1995) The decision to use the atomic bomb (Alfred A. Knopf).
- Saito-Kokubu, Y. et al. (2008) Depositional records of plutonium and 137Cs released from Nagasaki atomic bomb in sediment of Nishiyama reservoir at Nagasaki. J. Environ. Radioact. 99:211-7
- Collins, D.L. (1980) Pictures from the past: Journeys into health physics in the Manhattan District and other diverse places in: Health Physics: a Backward Glance (Pergamon Press).
🌸
🌸
| Hiroshima Revisited - .pdf by Michael Palmer, MD |
🌸
Michael Palmer MD. Hiroshima Revisited .pdf
🌸
https://archive.org/details/Hiroshima_revisited/mode/1up
🌸
Michael Palmer MD. Hiroshima Revisited .pdf
🌸
https://archive.org/details/Hiroshima_revisited/mode/1up
🌸
Hiroshima revisited by
Michael Palmer
Publication date
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Topics
Hiroshima, Nagasaki, atomic bomb, atomic bombings, nuclear bomb, revisionist history, historic revisionism, napalm, mustard gas, poison gas, battle gases, radiation, radioactivity, hibakusha
Publisher
Michael Palmer
English
The evidence that napalm and mustard gas helped fake the nuclear bombings
Printed copies are for sale at lulu.com.
Notes
This book examines the scientific and medical evidence to determine whether the conventional story of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki can be true. It concludes that
1. no nuclear detonations took place,
2. the cities were destroyed with conventional explosives and napalm,
3. the victims were killed not with radiation but with mustard gas, and also with napalm.
While most of the book deals with the medical and the physical evidence, the final two chapters also examine the wider historic and political implications.
Michael Palmer
Publication date
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Topics
Hiroshima, Nagasaki, atomic bomb, atomic bombings, nuclear bomb, revisionist history, historic revisionism, napalm, mustard gas, poison gas, battle gases, radiation, radioactivity, hibakusha
Publisher
Michael Palmer
English
The evidence that napalm and mustard gas helped fake the nuclear bombings
Printed copies are for sale at lulu.com.
Notes
This book examines the scientific and medical evidence to determine whether the conventional story of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki can be true. It concludes that
1. no nuclear detonations took place,
2. the cities were destroyed with conventional explosives and napalm,
3. the victims were killed not with radiation but with mustard gas, and also with napalm.
While most of the book deals with the medical and the physical evidence, the final two chapters also examine the wider historic and political implications.
Michael Palmer - Hiroshima Deaths Due to Mustard Gas
March 2, 2023
https://henrymakow.com/2023/03/michael-palmer---hiroshima-dea.html
"Both my mother and I had been through a great deal of strain during this time ... and then we also started to feel listless and began to lose our hair because we had breathed the gases when the atom bomb fell."
"We breathed the gases when the atom bomb fell"
Eyewitness testimony of mustard gas use in Hiroshima
by Michael Palmer, MD
(henrymakow.com)
In previous posts on this website [footnotes 1,2] and elsewhere [3,4], I have argued that no nuclear bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. However, many cases of acute radiation sickness were reported from both cities. How can we explain these?
I believe that these cases were caused not by radiation but rather by mustard gas, a chemical warfare agent that mimics the effects of radiation. Here, I present eyewitness testimony which supports this thesis. Objective medical evidence which confirms it will be discussed in a subsequent post.
Figure 1: Spontaneous subcutaneous bleeding (left) and hair loss (right) in two bombing victims from Hiroshima. Bleeding is due to the lack of blood platelets, which in turn is caused by bone marrow failure. Like the cells in the bone marrow, those in the hair follicles divide rapidly and thus are particularly susceptible to DNA-damaging agents such as radiation and mustard gas.
1. On mustard gas
Mustard gas, or sulfur mustard was first used during World War 1. Even though introduced only in 1917, it caused more casualties than any of the previously used battle gases. A key reason for this high lethality is that it bypasses the protection afforded by gas masks by attacking the skin, which it causes to blister, and is also taken up quite effectively across the skin. In those not protected by gas masks, it causes severe lung damage; this was reported in Iranian soldiers exposed to mustard gas used by Iraq in the war between the two countries [5].
Aside from causing acute damage to the skin and the lungs, mustard gas mimics the destructive effects of radiation on rapidly proliferating tissues such as the bone marrow, the hair follicles, and the intestinal mucous membranes. This similarity was recognized clinically as early as 1919 [6-8]. With both radiation and mustard gas, the underlying mechanism is now understood to be DNA damage.
The U.S. military had stockpiled mustard gas during World War 2 and also filled it into aerial bombs [9]. Thus, it would have been prepared for its use in the bombings of both cities.
2. Testimony which supports the use of mustard gas in the "atomic" bombings
Eyewitness reports which suggest the use of mustard gas are not in short supply. The possibility that poison gas had been released at Hiroshima was brought up early on by Dr. Masao Tsuzuki, the leading Japanese member on the U.S.-Japanese "Joint Commission" of medical scientists convened to investigate the aftermath of the bombing. The historian Sey Nishimura [10] quotes from a 1945 article by Tsuzuki:
"Immediately after the explosion of the atomic bomb, some gas permeated, which appeared like white smoke with stimulating odor. Many reported that when inhaled, it caused acute sore throat or suffocating pain."
The first Western journalist to report from Hiroshima, the Australian Wilfred Burchett [11], also brings up poison gas:
"My nose detected a peculiar odour unlike anything I have ever smelled before. It is something like sulphur, but not quite. I could smell it when I passed a fire that was still smouldering, or at a spot where they were still recovering bodies from the wreckage. But I could also smell it where everything was still deserted."
According to Burchett, the Japanese he spoke to believe that the smell is given off by the poisonous gas still issuing from the earth soaked with radioactivity released by the split uranium atom, and he reports that the Japanese then engaged in clearing the debris from the city centre were wearing gauze masks over their faces to protect themselves from the gas.
Among 105 witnesses who experienced the Hiroshima bombing as school age children, and whose memories were collected and published by the Japanese teacher Arata [12], 13 explicitly mention poisonous gas or fumes. One of them, Hisato Itoh, died of leukaemia shortly after writing his account, which contains this statement:
"Both my mother and I had been through a great deal of strain during this time ... and then we also started to feel listless and began to lose our hair because we had breathed the gases when the atom bomb fell."
Here are some more quotes by several other schoolchildren:
Tokiko Wada: "But Grandpa had breathed poisonous gas when the atom bomb fell and he got sick and went to the hospital. He died one night a little later and we had a funeral for him."
Satomi Kanekuni: "On August 6 when the bomb fell, Father and Mother were living in Yanagi-machi. They were trapped by the house when it fell down and inhaled poisonous gas."
Junya Kojima: "When I was five years old, there was the atom bomb explosion. My father was at his office then. I guess he breathed in poison gas ... he soon died."
Yohko Kuwabara: "Just then, I was blinded for a moment by piercing flash of bright light, and the air filled with yellow smoke like poison gas.
Yoshiaki Wada: My mother ... breathed the poison gas from the atom bomb. That's why she was so bad."
While not all of these reports point to mustard gas specifically, the respiratory symptoms and the hair loss mentioned in some of them are both quite suggestive. So is the sulfuric smell reported by Burchett in early September; both the smell itself and its long persistence point to mustard gas.
It is also rather striking how most of these witnesses draw a straight line from the atom bomb to the poisonous gas; it appears that they have been led to believe that atomic bombs somehow give rise to poisonous gas, which is untrue. The same error even found its way into the medical literature [13, p. 464]:
"Tsuzuki (1951) divided atom-bomb injuries into burns, traumas, and radiation injuries. Kajitano and Hatano (1953) ... proposed a fourth type in addition: atom-bomb gas injuries, which they attributed to the effect of residual radioactivity."
3. How can we decide between radiation and mustard gas effects in Hiroshima?
Here, we can distinguish effects of nuclear radiation that should have been observed but were not, and effects of mustard gas that were observed but should not have been. There are compelling examples of both kinds of evidence. However, Henry has admonished me to keep this short; therefore, I must defer a discussion of this evidence to another time.
In response to my questions. Michael wrote.
Physical damage: they used some strong airbursts, apparently, but most of the damage was apparently caused by conventional incendiaries. This is also how engineer de Seversky describes it, who visited both cities early in September 1945.
https://mpalmer.heresy.is/webnotes/HR/Introduction.html#sec-intro-seversky
Was there no mushroom cloud?
There was -- must have been fireworks of sorts. See
https://mpalmer.heresy.is/webnotes/HR/How-done.html#sec-makebelieve
The cloud is discussed under Section 13.1.4
Related - A Huge Article explaining the Hiroshima Fraud
References
1. Palmer, M. (2020) Japan Nuclear Attacks Were Faked (https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/10/palmer-nuclear-attacks-on-japan.html)
2. Palmer, M. (2023) Smoking Gun! No Nuclear Bombs Were Dropped on Japan (https://henrymakow.com/2023/02/nuclear-bombs-not-dropped.html)
3. Palmer, M. (2020) Hiroshima revisited: the evidence that napalm and mustard gas helped fake the atomic bombings (https://archive.org/details/Hiroshima_revisited)
4. Palmer, M. (2023) The truth about the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (https://mpalmer.heresy.is/the-truth-about-the-bombings-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki/)
5. Freitag, L. et al. (1991) The role of bronchoscopy in pulmonary complications due to mustard gas inhalation. Chest 100:1436-41 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=1935306)
6. Krumbhaar, E.B. and Krumbhaar, H.D. (1919) The Blood and Bone Marrow in Yellow Cross Gas (Mustard Gas) Poisoning: Changes produced in the Bone Marrow of Fatal Cases. J. Med.
Res. 40:497-508.3 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=19972497)
7. Pappenheimer, A.M. and Vance, M. (1920) The Effects Of Intravenous Injections Of Dichloroethylsulfide In Rabbits, With Special Reference To Its Leucotoxic Action. J. Exp. Med. 31:71-94 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=19868389)
8. Warthin, A.S. and Weller, C.V. (1919) The medical aspects of mustard gas poisoning (Mosby) (http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/756441378)
9. Anonymous, (1947) U.S. Explosive Ordnance (U.S. Navy Bureau of Ordnance) (https://archive.org/details/OP1664USExplosiveOrdnanceVolume2/)
10. Nishimura, S. (1995) Censorship of the atomic bomb casualty reports in occupied Japan. A complete ban vs temporary delay. JAMA 274:520-2 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=7629965)
11. Burchett, W.G. (2007) The atomic plague in: Rebel journalism: the writings of Wilfred Burchett (http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/172979873). This report first appeared under the name 'Peter Burchett' in the Daily Express on September fifth, 1945.
12. (ed.: Osada, A.) (1980) Children of Hiroshima (Publishing Committee for "Children of Hiroshima") (http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/8095388)
13. Watanabe, S. (ed.: Grundmann, E.) (1974) Cancer and leukemia developing among atomic bomb survivors in: Handbuch der allgemeinen Pathology [Handbook of general pathology] (Springer).
March 2, 2023
https://henrymakow.com/2023/03/michael-palmer---hiroshima-dea.html
"Both my mother and I had been through a great deal of strain during this time ... and then we also started to feel listless and began to lose our hair because we had breathed the gases when the atom bomb fell."
"We breathed the gases when the atom bomb fell"
Eyewitness testimony of mustard gas use in Hiroshima
by Michael Palmer, MD
(henrymakow.com)
In previous posts on this website [footnotes 1,2] and elsewhere [3,4], I have argued that no nuclear bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. However, many cases of acute radiation sickness were reported from both cities. How can we explain these?
I believe that these cases were caused not by radiation but rather by mustard gas, a chemical warfare agent that mimics the effects of radiation. Here, I present eyewitness testimony which supports this thesis. Objective medical evidence which confirms it will be discussed in a subsequent post.
Figure 1: Spontaneous subcutaneous bleeding (left) and hair loss (right) in two bombing victims from Hiroshima. Bleeding is due to the lack of blood platelets, which in turn is caused by bone marrow failure. Like the cells in the bone marrow, those in the hair follicles divide rapidly and thus are particularly susceptible to DNA-damaging agents such as radiation and mustard gas.
1. On mustard gas
Mustard gas, or sulfur mustard was first used during World War 1. Even though introduced only in 1917, it caused more casualties than any of the previously used battle gases. A key reason for this high lethality is that it bypasses the protection afforded by gas masks by attacking the skin, which it causes to blister, and is also taken up quite effectively across the skin. In those not protected by gas masks, it causes severe lung damage; this was reported in Iranian soldiers exposed to mustard gas used by Iraq in the war between the two countries [5].
Aside from causing acute damage to the skin and the lungs, mustard gas mimics the destructive effects of radiation on rapidly proliferating tissues such as the bone marrow, the hair follicles, and the intestinal mucous membranes. This similarity was recognized clinically as early as 1919 [6-8]. With both radiation and mustard gas, the underlying mechanism is now understood to be DNA damage.
The U.S. military had stockpiled mustard gas during World War 2 and also filled it into aerial bombs [9]. Thus, it would have been prepared for its use in the bombings of both cities.
2. Testimony which supports the use of mustard gas in the "atomic" bombings
Eyewitness reports which suggest the use of mustard gas are not in short supply. The possibility that poison gas had been released at Hiroshima was brought up early on by Dr. Masao Tsuzuki, the leading Japanese member on the U.S.-Japanese "Joint Commission" of medical scientists convened to investigate the aftermath of the bombing. The historian Sey Nishimura [10] quotes from a 1945 article by Tsuzuki:
"Immediately after the explosion of the atomic bomb, some gas permeated, which appeared like white smoke with stimulating odor. Many reported that when inhaled, it caused acute sore throat or suffocating pain."
The first Western journalist to report from Hiroshima, the Australian Wilfred Burchett [11], also brings up poison gas:
"My nose detected a peculiar odour unlike anything I have ever smelled before. It is something like sulphur, but not quite. I could smell it when I passed a fire that was still smouldering, or at a spot where they were still recovering bodies from the wreckage. But I could also smell it where everything was still deserted."
According to Burchett, the Japanese he spoke to believe that the smell is given off by the poisonous gas still issuing from the earth soaked with radioactivity released by the split uranium atom, and he reports that the Japanese then engaged in clearing the debris from the city centre were wearing gauze masks over their faces to protect themselves from the gas.
Among 105 witnesses who experienced the Hiroshima bombing as school age children, and whose memories were collected and published by the Japanese teacher Arata [12], 13 explicitly mention poisonous gas or fumes. One of them, Hisato Itoh, died of leukaemia shortly after writing his account, which contains this statement:
"Both my mother and I had been through a great deal of strain during this time ... and then we also started to feel listless and began to lose our hair because we had breathed the gases when the atom bomb fell."
Here are some more quotes by several other schoolchildren:
Tokiko Wada: "But Grandpa had breathed poisonous gas when the atom bomb fell and he got sick and went to the hospital. He died one night a little later and we had a funeral for him."
Satomi Kanekuni: "On August 6 when the bomb fell, Father and Mother were living in Yanagi-machi. They were trapped by the house when it fell down and inhaled poisonous gas."
Junya Kojima: "When I was five years old, there was the atom bomb explosion. My father was at his office then. I guess he breathed in poison gas ... he soon died."
Yohko Kuwabara: "Just then, I was blinded for a moment by piercing flash of bright light, and the air filled with yellow smoke like poison gas.
Yoshiaki Wada: My mother ... breathed the poison gas from the atom bomb. That's why she was so bad."
While not all of these reports point to mustard gas specifically, the respiratory symptoms and the hair loss mentioned in some of them are both quite suggestive. So is the sulfuric smell reported by Burchett in early September; both the smell itself and its long persistence point to mustard gas.
It is also rather striking how most of these witnesses draw a straight line from the atom bomb to the poisonous gas; it appears that they have been led to believe that atomic bombs somehow give rise to poisonous gas, which is untrue. The same error even found its way into the medical literature [13, p. 464]:
"Tsuzuki (1951) divided atom-bomb injuries into burns, traumas, and radiation injuries. Kajitano and Hatano (1953) ... proposed a fourth type in addition: atom-bomb gas injuries, which they attributed to the effect of residual radioactivity."
3. How can we decide between radiation and mustard gas effects in Hiroshima?
Here, we can distinguish effects of nuclear radiation that should have been observed but were not, and effects of mustard gas that were observed but should not have been. There are compelling examples of both kinds of evidence. However, Henry has admonished me to keep this short; therefore, I must defer a discussion of this evidence to another time.
In response to my questions. Michael wrote.
Physical damage: they used some strong airbursts, apparently, but most of the damage was apparently caused by conventional incendiaries. This is also how engineer de Seversky describes it, who visited both cities early in September 1945.
https://mpalmer.heresy.is/webnotes/HR/Introduction.html#sec-intro-seversky
Was there no mushroom cloud?
There was -- must have been fireworks of sorts. See
https://mpalmer.heresy.is/webnotes/HR/How-done.html#sec-makebelieve
The cloud is discussed under Section 13.1.4
Related - A Huge Article explaining the Hiroshima Fraud
References
1. Palmer, M. (2020) Japan Nuclear Attacks Were Faked (https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/10/palmer-nuclear-attacks-on-japan.html)
2. Palmer, M. (2023) Smoking Gun! No Nuclear Bombs Were Dropped on Japan (https://henrymakow.com/2023/02/nuclear-bombs-not-dropped.html)
3. Palmer, M. (2020) Hiroshima revisited: the evidence that napalm and mustard gas helped fake the atomic bombings (https://archive.org/details/Hiroshima_revisited)
4. Palmer, M. (2023) The truth about the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (https://mpalmer.heresy.is/the-truth-about-the-bombings-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki/)
5. Freitag, L. et al. (1991) The role of bronchoscopy in pulmonary complications due to mustard gas inhalation. Chest 100:1436-41 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=1935306)
6. Krumbhaar, E.B. and Krumbhaar, H.D. (1919) The Blood and Bone Marrow in Yellow Cross Gas (Mustard Gas) Poisoning: Changes produced in the Bone Marrow of Fatal Cases. J. Med.
Res. 40:497-508.3 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=19972497)
7. Pappenheimer, A.M. and Vance, M. (1920) The Effects Of Intravenous Injections Of Dichloroethylsulfide In Rabbits, With Special Reference To Its Leucotoxic Action. J. Exp. Med. 31:71-94 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=19868389)
8. Warthin, A.S. and Weller, C.V. (1919) The medical aspects of mustard gas poisoning (Mosby) (http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/756441378)
9. Anonymous, (1947) U.S. Explosive Ordnance (U.S. Navy Bureau of Ordnance) (https://archive.org/details/OP1664USExplosiveOrdnanceVolume2/)
10. Nishimura, S. (1995) Censorship of the atomic bomb casualty reports in occupied Japan. A complete ban vs temporary delay. JAMA 274:520-2 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=7629965)
11. Burchett, W.G. (2007) The atomic plague in: Rebel journalism: the writings of Wilfred Burchett (http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/172979873). This report first appeared under the name 'Peter Burchett' in the Daily Express on September fifth, 1945.
12. (ed.: Osada, A.) (1980) Children of Hiroshima (Publishing Committee for "Children of Hiroshima") (http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/8095388)
13. Watanabe, S. (ed.: Grundmann, E.) (1974) Cancer and leukemia developing among atomic bomb survivors in: Handbuch der allgemeinen Pathology [Handbook of general pathology] (Springer).
🌸
Videos
🌸
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jOXslJFIft3d/
https://rumble.com/v182yf5-nuclear-hoax-nukes-do-not-exist.html
https://rumble.com/v1g9hjx-nuclear-hoax-truth-.html
https://rumble.com/vx95er-the-atomic-bomb-was-a-hoax-by-noel-joshua-hadley.html
https://rumble.com/v12eu3d-nukes-are-fake-some-links.html
https://rumble.com/v1mw853-have-you-heard-of-the-nuclear-hoax.html
https://rumble.com/v1fj1xy-the-hiroshima-bomb-jesuit-priests-
fatima-and-the-rosary-mirrored-jesuit-nuc.html
https://www.bitchute.com/video/SVGBQ5zIxfSj/
🌸
The Tsar Bomba almost 60 years ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtCTzbh4mNQ
🌸
Russia has released previously classified footage of the world’s largest nuclear explosion,
caused when the Soviet Union detonated the so-called Tsar Bomba almost 60 years ago.
🌸
Videos
🌸
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jOXslJFIft3d/
https://rumble.com/v182yf5-nuclear-hoax-nukes-do-not-exist.html
https://rumble.com/v1g9hjx-nuclear-hoax-truth-.html
https://rumble.com/vx95er-the-atomic-bomb-was-a-hoax-by-noel-joshua-hadley.html
https://rumble.com/v12eu3d-nukes-are-fake-some-links.html
https://rumble.com/v1mw853-have-you-heard-of-the-nuclear-hoax.html
https://rumble.com/v1fj1xy-the-hiroshima-bomb-jesuit-priests-
fatima-and-the-rosary-mirrored-jesuit-nuc.html
https://www.bitchute.com/video/SVGBQ5zIxfSj/
🌸
The Tsar Bomba almost 60 years ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtCTzbh4mNQ
🌸
Russia has released previously classified footage of the world’s largest nuclear explosion,
caused when the Soviet Union detonated the so-called Tsar Bomba almost 60 years ago.
🌸
