🌸
Helen Gurley Brown
🌸
September 16, 2023
🌸
🌸
September 16, 2023
🌸
🌸
(l. Cosmo Editor Helen Gurley Brown in her office in 1965)
🌸
(l. Cosmo Editor Helen Gurley Brown in her office in 1965)
🌸
Helen Gurley Brown Taught ...
Women to Use Sex for Career, not Family ...
Women want love, marriage, and family. Men want Sex.
Before second-wave feminism, the watchword for women was "No sex before marriage."
Feminists like Brown duped women into giving sex in exchange for NOTHING. Thanks partly to her, almost 50% of American women are childless today. She deprived women of their honored natural and social roles as wives and mothers. Feminism pretended to empower women while doing exactly the opposite.
"For every genuine case of men sexually harassing women, there are probably ten cases of women using sex for advancement. Helen Gurley Brown made that strategy explicit." -Reader
Author of Sex & the Single Girl, Cosmo Editor Helen Gurley Brown, (1922-2012) taught women to sell their bodies rather than demand love, courtship, and marriage first. She was an Illuminati social engineer, a Satanist whore who made prostitution seem chic.
In her autobiography, "I'm Wild Again" (2000) she tells us right away that in 1941, at age 19 she joined an "escort service" and had sex with a 50-year-old man for $5 (worth $80 today.) Page 4 She also boasted she slept with 178 men before her marriage.
Feminism Tricked Women Into Giving Up Their Power
From Aug. 14, 2012 & May 21, 2019
By Henry Makow PhD
In 1965, Helen Gurley Brown, the editor of Cosmopolitan, said that a housewife was "a parasite, a dependent, a scrounger, a sponge or a bum." She didn't call them whores because she respects whores.
Her sister-in-arms, Betty Friedan, compared homemakers to "concentration camp inmates" because of the lack of stimulation and opportunity for advancement in concentration camps. (The Feminine Mystique, p. 306)
These mind-boggling attacks typify the vicious psychological war against society by Illuminati Satanists. Their program to degrade women, destroy families, arrest heterosexual development, create dysfunction, and reduce population has been devastatingly successful.
"The scale of marital breakdown in the West since 1960 has no historical precedent," says historian Lawrence Stone. In 40 short years, the marriage rate is down by one-third, the divorce rate has doubled, the birth rate is one-half, and single-parent families per capita have tripled. Forty percent of all children born in the US in 2007 were out of wedlock compared to 4% in 1957. (Bennett, The Broken Hearth, p.10)
In 1952, the Rockefellers controlled $250 million dollars of media advertising annually. They hyped Helen Gurley Brown's 1962 book, "Sex and the Single Girl" and the movie. Single women were told they should have careers and sex instead of family. At the same time, the Rockefellers were also funding and lobbying for population control and eugenics.
As editor of Cosmopolitan (1965-97), Brown was a role model for career women the world over (36 foreign editions.) She married her manager at age 37 and remained childless. Along with Communist activist Betty Frieden, and CIA agent Gloria Steinem, Brown belongs to the triumvirate of modern feminist social engineers. When she died, Mayor Michael Bloomberg said, "New York City lost a pioneer who reshaped not only the entire media industry, but the nation's culture. She was a role model for the millions of women whose private thoughts, wonders and dreams she addressed so brilliantly in print."
Women to Use Sex for Career, not Family ...
Women want love, marriage, and family. Men want Sex.
Before second-wave feminism, the watchword for women was "No sex before marriage."
Feminists like Brown duped women into giving sex in exchange for NOTHING. Thanks partly to her, almost 50% of American women are childless today. She deprived women of their honored natural and social roles as wives and mothers. Feminism pretended to empower women while doing exactly the opposite.
"For every genuine case of men sexually harassing women, there are probably ten cases of women using sex for advancement. Helen Gurley Brown made that strategy explicit." -Reader
Author of Sex & the Single Girl, Cosmo Editor Helen Gurley Brown, (1922-2012) taught women to sell their bodies rather than demand love, courtship, and marriage first. She was an Illuminati social engineer, a Satanist whore who made prostitution seem chic.
In her autobiography, "I'm Wild Again" (2000) she tells us right away that in 1941, at age 19 she joined an "escort service" and had sex with a 50-year-old man for $5 (worth $80 today.) Page 4 She also boasted she slept with 178 men before her marriage.
Feminism Tricked Women Into Giving Up Their Power
From Aug. 14, 2012 & May 21, 2019
By Henry Makow PhD
In 1965, Helen Gurley Brown, the editor of Cosmopolitan, said that a housewife was "a parasite, a dependent, a scrounger, a sponge or a bum." She didn't call them whores because she respects whores.
Her sister-in-arms, Betty Friedan, compared homemakers to "concentration camp inmates" because of the lack of stimulation and opportunity for advancement in concentration camps. (The Feminine Mystique, p. 306)
These mind-boggling attacks typify the vicious psychological war against society by Illuminati Satanists. Their program to degrade women, destroy families, arrest heterosexual development, create dysfunction, and reduce population has been devastatingly successful.
"The scale of marital breakdown in the West since 1960 has no historical precedent," says historian Lawrence Stone. In 40 short years, the marriage rate is down by one-third, the divorce rate has doubled, the birth rate is one-half, and single-parent families per capita have tripled. Forty percent of all children born in the US in 2007 were out of wedlock compared to 4% in 1957. (Bennett, The Broken Hearth, p.10)
In 1952, the Rockefellers controlled $250 million dollars of media advertising annually. They hyped Helen Gurley Brown's 1962 book, "Sex and the Single Girl" and the movie. Single women were told they should have careers and sex instead of family. At the same time, the Rockefellers were also funding and lobbying for population control and eugenics.
As editor of Cosmopolitan (1965-97), Brown was a role model for career women the world over (36 foreign editions.) She married her manager at age 37 and remained childless. Along with Communist activist Betty Frieden, and CIA agent Gloria Steinem, Brown belongs to the triumvirate of modern feminist social engineers. When she died, Mayor Michael Bloomberg said, "New York City lost a pioneer who reshaped not only the entire media industry, but the nation's culture. She was a role model for the millions of women whose private thoughts, wonders and dreams she addressed so brilliantly in print."
🌸
🌸
(every issue is a HO issue)
WHAT HOUSEWIVES ARE NOT...
Brown respects whores because prostitution is her program for women. In her autobiography, "I'm Wild Again" (2000) she tells us right away that in 1941, at age 19 she joined an "escort service" and made out with a 50-year-old man for $5 ($80 today.)
"Why wasn't I revolted? I was a little but not utterly. I think even then I was a practicing realist... I tried to do whatever you needed to do to survive." (4)
She got a secretarial job on the understanding that she would sleep with her married boss and he would "take care" of her in return. This arrangement lasted for a few years. She describes the routine:
"After cocktail hour we did go to my flat to make love. The lovemaking? ...This was two people copulating -- he seemed to have a good time...Moi learned to fake often and well." (15)
Brown's excuse is that she was helping a mother and invalid sister back in Arkansas. (Prostitutes generally don't come from wealth.)
Her only regret: she never really got the promised financial payoff: "I needed somebody to tell me how to treat a man in this situation, how to flatter and cuddle and coo. I should have done it better." (19)
Helen Gurley Brown became that tutor. She taught women how to parlay sex appeal into profit and control. She helped to transform feminine nature from love and devotion to calculated predation.
WHAT HOUSEWIVES ARE NOT...
Brown respects whores because prostitution is her program for women. In her autobiography, "I'm Wild Again" (2000) she tells us right away that in 1941, at age 19 she joined an "escort service" and made out with a 50-year-old man for $5 ($80 today.)
"Why wasn't I revolted? I was a little but not utterly. I think even then I was a practicing realist... I tried to do whatever you needed to do to survive." (4)
She got a secretarial job on the understanding that she would sleep with her married boss and he would "take care" of her in return. This arrangement lasted for a few years. She describes the routine:
"After cocktail hour we did go to my flat to make love. The lovemaking? ...This was two people copulating -- he seemed to have a good time...Moi learned to fake often and well." (15)
Brown's excuse is that she was helping a mother and invalid sister back in Arkansas. (Prostitutes generally don't come from wealth.)
Her only regret: she never really got the promised financial payoff: "I needed somebody to tell me how to treat a man in this situation, how to flatter and cuddle and coo. I should have done it better." (19)
Helen Gurley Brown became that tutor. She taught women how to parlay sex appeal into profit and control. She helped to transform feminine nature from love and devotion to calculated predation.
🌸
🌸
(At home with husband, producer David Brown)
🌸
(At home with husband, producer David Brown)
🌸
Here is how she got her husband to marry her.
"You get the hook in. The darling, charming, delicious, sexy you has to have sunk into him so seriously; the hook [is] buried so deep he can't get it out without severe pain, i.e. can't live without you. You then close in and deliver your ultimatum. I had to deliver mine twice."(27)
While Brown claims she was loyal, she thinks adultery is just fine. The man's wife is to blame if he strays. Sex, Brown says, "is a physical feeling" and "it feels good... one of the best things we have...." not to be subjected to "a moral imperative."
Suffocating a sexual urge can lead to "twitches, tension or depression" and driving "off a cliff some night." (52) But, like a practiced madam, she cautions "never sleep with someone who has less money or more troubles than you." (225)
Office romances and even sleeping with the boss are just fine as long as you're discreet. (107) She tells her readers to make the boss "look good," let him take credit for their work, and not complain about putting in extra hours.
Feminism, it seems, has removed wives and mothers from their families, and put them to work for corporations. Instead of serving husbands and children who love them, women now obey bosses who pay for their services and fire them in a downturn.
In Brown's view, if a loving husband provides for a devoted wife, she is a "parasite." But if she is a corporate slave or whore, then she is "independent" and "liberated."
This quote from the review of a new biography reiterates her contempt for marriage and family: "When "Sex and the Single Girl" came out in the early 1960s, the most shocking thing ... was Brown's matter-of-fact attitude toward affairs with married men."
Feminism is an excuse to sell yourself:
"...she recommended that her readers take advantage of the situation, milking a guilty and grateful married lover for gifts, money and workplace advancement, which Brown regarded as fair recompense for the fact that men got paid more than women and kept the best jobs for themselves."
"You get the hook in. The darling, charming, delicious, sexy you has to have sunk into him so seriously; the hook [is] buried so deep he can't get it out without severe pain, i.e. can't live without you. You then close in and deliver your ultimatum. I had to deliver mine twice."(27)
While Brown claims she was loyal, she thinks adultery is just fine. The man's wife is to blame if he strays. Sex, Brown says, "is a physical feeling" and "it feels good... one of the best things we have...." not to be subjected to "a moral imperative."
Suffocating a sexual urge can lead to "twitches, tension or depression" and driving "off a cliff some night." (52) But, like a practiced madam, she cautions "never sleep with someone who has less money or more troubles than you." (225)
Office romances and even sleeping with the boss are just fine as long as you're discreet. (107) She tells her readers to make the boss "look good," let him take credit for their work, and not complain about putting in extra hours.
Feminism, it seems, has removed wives and mothers from their families, and put them to work for corporations. Instead of serving husbands and children who love them, women now obey bosses who pay for their services and fire them in a downturn.
In Brown's view, if a loving husband provides for a devoted wife, she is a "parasite." But if she is a corporate slave or whore, then she is "independent" and "liberated."
This quote from the review of a new biography reiterates her contempt for marriage and family: "When "Sex and the Single Girl" came out in the early 1960s, the most shocking thing ... was Brown's matter-of-fact attitude toward affairs with married men."
Feminism is an excuse to sell yourself:
"...she recommended that her readers take advantage of the situation, milking a guilty and grateful married lover for gifts, money and workplace advancement, which Brown regarded as fair recompense for the fact that men got paid more than women and kept the best jobs for themselves."
🌸
🌸
FAMILY vs. FEMINISM:
THE BATTLE LINE OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER
The message that sexual urges were not to be denied, that promiscuity was "cool" and "modern," was instilled in women to degrade them and undermine marriage. The state is intended to replace the family.
In reality, women achieve fulfillment through self-sacrifice. It is a vicious slander to portray devoted hardworking wives and mothers as "bums" and "parasites."
The assumption that only work performed for cash (state/economy) is of value is sick. They want to denigrate the personal and spiritual realm, the private life of the family, and the effort that this entails.
Brown says, "Whenever you live through someone else, they want someone else." This is simply not true. We love Mom because she put us ahead of becoming the top producer at Century 21. Love is self-sacrifice.
Beyond a certain point, worldly ambition in a woman is masculine and impersonal. America is full of bitter neutered women and befuddled emasculated men.
The only question remaining was, Was she Jewish? This is unclear, but she married a Jew and perfectly advanced the Masonic Jewish agenda.
Jews definitely mourned her passing. If she wasn't an Illuminati Jew by birth, she was in every other respect. She did more than most to fulfill a primary goal of Communism- destroy the nuclear family.
Related - Helen Gurley Brown - Returning to the Feminine
Sheryl Sandberg thinks #MeToo hasn't gone far enough
Read About Women's Magazines in "How the Rockefellers Re-Engineered Women"
Germany Coerces Woman to be a Prostitute
Heroine or Whore? Daily Telegraph -The Cosmo Girl who Changed the World (for the worse)
Vision of Women "Screwed Up"
First Comment from G
"The source of women's power was making marriage a condition for sex." Henry, that's one of the most profound things you ever wrote. Someone reading it on the surface may at first think it's simply about accruing a commitment and stabilizing one's security, which is fine in itself. But other levels that move into deeper wisdom speak of the assurance of fulfilling one's purpose in life: to partner in being fruitful, and to be fulfilled in carrying on the human race. What could be more empowering than being aligned with one's life purpose? Of course, all of this is made more real and beautifully enhanced when love is at the core. May the debauchery die soon, and I certainly hope it's not too late to rescue the women back to sanity.
https://henrymakow.com/130103.html
THE BATTLE LINE OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER
The message that sexual urges were not to be denied, that promiscuity was "cool" and "modern," was instilled in women to degrade them and undermine marriage. The state is intended to replace the family.
In reality, women achieve fulfillment through self-sacrifice. It is a vicious slander to portray devoted hardworking wives and mothers as "bums" and "parasites."
The assumption that only work performed for cash (state/economy) is of value is sick. They want to denigrate the personal and spiritual realm, the private life of the family, and the effort that this entails.
Brown says, "Whenever you live through someone else, they want someone else." This is simply not true. We love Mom because she put us ahead of becoming the top producer at Century 21. Love is self-sacrifice.
Beyond a certain point, worldly ambition in a woman is masculine and impersonal. America is full of bitter neutered women and befuddled emasculated men.
The only question remaining was, Was she Jewish? This is unclear, but she married a Jew and perfectly advanced the Masonic Jewish agenda.
Jews definitely mourned her passing. If she wasn't an Illuminati Jew by birth, she was in every other respect. She did more than most to fulfill a primary goal of Communism- destroy the nuclear family.
Related - Helen Gurley Brown - Returning to the Feminine
Sheryl Sandberg thinks #MeToo hasn't gone far enough
Read About Women's Magazines in "How the Rockefellers Re-Engineered Women"
Germany Coerces Woman to be a Prostitute
Heroine or Whore? Daily Telegraph -The Cosmo Girl who Changed the World (for the worse)
Vision of Women "Screwed Up"
First Comment from G
"The source of women's power was making marriage a condition for sex." Henry, that's one of the most profound things you ever wrote. Someone reading it on the surface may at first think it's simply about accruing a commitment and stabilizing one's security, which is fine in itself. But other levels that move into deeper wisdom speak of the assurance of fulfilling one's purpose in life: to partner in being fruitful, and to be fulfilled in carrying on the human race. What could be more empowering than being aligned with one's life purpose? Of course, all of this is made more real and beautifully enhanced when love is at the core. May the debauchery die soon, and I certainly hope it's not too late to rescue the women back to sanity.
https://henrymakow.com/130103.html
🌸
The Ancient
Rig Veda Writings
About Women ...
🌸
https://ancientmistery.weebly.com/rig-veda.html
🌸
https://rumble.com/v370sm1-sexual-degeneracy-is-the-final-
phase-in-the-collapse-of-a-civilisation.html
🌸
In the final days of its decline Roman civilisation
was marked by widespread promiscuity and perversion.
According various psychics the same thing had happened in Atlantis
during an earlier epoch, before its final inundation.
Are we seeing the same process unfold today?
Only now is this being consciously promoted to accelerate the collapse?
🌸
The Ancient
Rig Veda Writings
About Women ...
🌸
https://ancientmistery.weebly.com/rig-veda.html
🌸
https://rumble.com/v370sm1-sexual-degeneracy-is-the-final-
phase-in-the-collapse-of-a-civilisation.html
🌸
In the final days of its decline Roman civilisation
was marked by widespread promiscuity and perversion.
According various psychics the same thing had happened in Atlantis
during an earlier epoch, before its final inundation.
Are we seeing the same process unfold today?
Only now is this being consciously promoted to accelerate the collapse?
🌸
🌸
From Rig Veda
... There is no creature more sinful than women.
Woman is a blazing fire. She is the illusion. She is the sharp edge of the razor.
She is poison. She is a snake. She is fire. She is, verily, all these united together.
The Grandsire having ascertained what was in the hearts of the deities,
created women, with the aid of an Atharvan rite.
In a former creation women were all virtuous.
Those, however, that sprang from this creation with the aid of an illusion became sinful.
The Grandsire bestowed upon them the desire of enjoyment, all kinds of carnal pleasure.
Tempted by the desire of enjoyment, they began to pursue persons of the other sex.
Women are endued with senses the most powerful, that they have no scriptures to follow,
and that they are living lies.
Beds and seats and ornaments and food and drink and the absence of all that is respectable
and righteous, indulgence in disagreeable words, and love of sexual companionship.
🌸
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m13/m13b005.htm
The Mahabharata, Book 13: Anusasana Parva: Section XL
Mahabharata Anushasna Parva Chapter 40
Why Manusmriti and Mahabharata say women are living ...
🌸
From Rig Veda
... There is no creature more sinful than women.
Woman is a blazing fire. She is the illusion. She is the sharp edge of the razor.
She is poison. She is a snake. She is fire. She is, verily, all these united together.
The Grandsire having ascertained what was in the hearts of the deities,
created women, with the aid of an Atharvan rite.
In a former creation women were all virtuous.
Those, however, that sprang from this creation with the aid of an illusion became sinful.
The Grandsire bestowed upon them the desire of enjoyment, all kinds of carnal pleasure.
Tempted by the desire of enjoyment, they began to pursue persons of the other sex.
Women are endued with senses the most powerful, that they have no scriptures to follow,
and that they are living lies.
Beds and seats and ornaments and food and drink and the absence of all that is respectable
and righteous, indulgence in disagreeable words, and love of sexual companionship.
🌸
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m13/m13b005.htm
The Mahabharata, Book 13: Anusasana Parva: Section XL
Mahabharata Anushasna Parva Chapter 40
Why Manusmriti and Mahabharata say women are living ...
🌸
🌸
Liberal Women
Destroyed the World!
🌸
Where did all of these selfish
liberal women come from?
Why have they turned traitor on their own people?
Why are they in open rebellion against God?
🌸
https://henrymakow.com/2021/08/Stupid-White-Liberal-Women-Destroyed-the-US.html
🌸
Liberal Women
Destroyed the World!
🌸
Where did all of these selfish
liberal women come from?
Why have they turned traitor on their own people?
Why are they in open rebellion against God?
🌸
https://henrymakow.com/2021/08/Stupid-White-Liberal-Women-Destroyed-the-US.html
🌸
🌸
"Unlike the movies,
you cannot spot their degree of evilness easily.
You cannot spot it when you are courting them, nor when you pop the question or say I do.
What may surprise you is that you cannot even spot it after you are married.
The only time you will see the true nature of your be troth’s evil is during your divorce.
Their evil breath will tear the flesh from your bones like a modern day dragon."
🌸
https://unpublishedarticles.com/all-women-are-evil-divorce-is-fundamentally-a-war/
🌸
The True Nature of a Wife
🌸
See Her Attitude at a Divorce
🌸
Divorce Is Fundamentally a War
🌸
"Falsehood, vain boldness, craftiness, stupidity, impatience,
over - greediness, impurity and harshness
are the natural qualities of women."
🌸
Goddess Uma in Padma purana srshti khadna / Chapter 52 verse 25
🌸
🌸
Woman's natural role is to nurture husband
and children and to be cherished in return.
🌸
Adam Weishaupt a Jesuit and Satanist
who was the originator of the
ORIGINAL Communist Philosophy reasoned correctly that ...
if the Illuminati (Freemasons) could alienate the women
from their role,
they could become a powerful subversive tool
for world revolution.
🌸
http://newworldorderuniversity.com/jews-around-weishaupt/
Adam Weishaupt - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Weishaupt
Woman's natural role is to nurture husband
and children and to be cherished in return.
🌸
Adam Weishaupt a Jesuit and Satanist
who was the originator of the
ORIGINAL Communist Philosophy reasoned correctly that ...
if the Illuminati (Freemasons) could alienate the women
from their role,
they could become a powerful subversive tool
for world revolution.
🌸
http://newworldorderuniversity.com/jews-around-weishaupt/
Adam Weishaupt - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Weishaupt
🌸
"Falsehood, vain boldness, craftiness, stupidity, impatience,
over - greediness, impurity and harshness are the natural qualities of women."
🌸
Goddess Uma in Padma purana srshti khadna / Chapter 52 verse 25
🌸
"Falsehood, vain boldness, craftiness, stupidity, impatience,
over - greediness, impurity and harshness are the natural qualities of women."
🌸
Goddess Uma in Padma purana srshti khadna / Chapter 52 verse 25
🌸
🌸
A wise man should marry
a woman born in a good family.
🌸
https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/the-padma-purana/d/doc364175.html
A wise man should marry
a woman born in a good family.
🌸
https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/the-padma-purana/d/doc364175.html
🌸
Full text of "Woman In The Sacred Scriptures Of Hinduism" https://archive.org
🌸
Even though a goddess is called “mother,”
it does not follow that this female divinity shall possess ...
(c) goddesses as wives of the great gods, as Indrani, Varunani and Agnayi. ... terms:
🌸
Carl Jung: the whole art lies in extracting wisdom from stupidity.
https://carljungdepthpsychologysite.blog
🌸
Many roots into the black earth,
repeating for all eternity the weaving ...
Stupidity is the mother of the wise,
but cleverness never.
🌸
https://hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/15938/negative-characterisitcs-of-women-ravana
Full text of "Woman In The Sacred Scriptures Of Hinduism" https://archive.org
🌸
Even though a goddess is called “mother,”
it does not follow that this female divinity shall possess ...
(c) goddesses as wives of the great gods, as Indrani, Varunani and Agnayi. ... terms:
🌸
Carl Jung: the whole art lies in extracting wisdom from stupidity.
https://carljungdepthpsychologysite.blog
🌸
Many roots into the black earth,
repeating for all eternity the weaving ...
Stupidity is the mother of the wise,
but cleverness never.
🌸
https://hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/15938/negative-characterisitcs-of-women-ravana
🌸
🌸
🌸
Adam Weishaupt
Born: February 6, 1748 - Died: November 18, 1830. - Occupation: Philosopher.
🌸
The original order of the Bavarian Illuminati was founded
on the First of May in the year 1776
by Adam Weishaupt
🌸
Adam Weishaupt - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Weishaupt
The Original 1776 Bavarian Illuminatenordes: The Order of
...https://www.royalartsociety.com/2018/04/02/the-original-1776-bavarian-illuminatenordes-the-order-of-the-illuminati-part-i/
More Images for adam weishaupt 1776The Illuminati JESUITS 1776 Adam Weishaupt 'Pawns in the ...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qo3AgpTDfhU
A history of the New World Order — Part I - Michael Journalhttps://www.michaeljournal.org/articles/world-government/item/a-history-of-the-new-world-order-part-i
Adam Weishaupt Biography - Facts, Childhood, Family Life ...https://www.thefamouspeople.com/profiles/adam-weishaupt-3498.php
🌸
Illuminati founder Adam Weishaupt identified
women as society's Achille's heel:
"There is no way of influencing men so powerfully as by means of the women. These should therefore be our chief study; we should insinuate ourselves into their good opinion, give them hints of emancipation from the tyranny of public opinion, and of standing up for themselves; it will be an immense relief to their enslaved minds to be freed from any one bond of restraint, and it will fire them the more, and cause them to work for us with zeal, without knowing that they do so; for they will only be indulging their own desire of personal admiration."
Woman's natural role is to nurture husband and children and to be cherished in return. Weishaupt reasoned correctly that if the Illuminati (Freemasons) could alienate them from this role,
they could become a powerful subversive tool
for world revolution.
Thank God, there are many exceptions. Brilliant courageous women like Carrie Madej, Judy Mikovitz and Celeste Solum are leading the exposure of the covid hoax.
Elizabeth Dilling, Edith Star Miller, Paquita de Shismareff and Nesta Webster were pioneers in exposing the Judeo Masonic conspiracy.
(Another indication of women's stupidity is their embrace of feminism and "sexual liberation" which amounts to giving away what men most desire and getting virtually nothing in return. Sexual intercourse is an act of male possession and female surrender.
This is LOVE. For a woman to be possessed and then tossed aside like a piece of garbage is self-defeating. By not insisting on courtship, love and marriage, they are complicit in their own destruction and social isolation i.e. no family.
It's all in a day's work for the Satanists who control our minds.)
Adam Weishaupt
Born: February 6, 1748 - Died: November 18, 1830. - Occupation: Philosopher.
🌸
The original order of the Bavarian Illuminati was founded
on the First of May in the year 1776
by Adam Weishaupt
🌸
Adam Weishaupt - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Weishaupt
The Original 1776 Bavarian Illuminatenordes: The Order of
...https://www.royalartsociety.com/2018/04/02/the-original-1776-bavarian-illuminatenordes-the-order-of-the-illuminati-part-i/
More Images for adam weishaupt 1776The Illuminati JESUITS 1776 Adam Weishaupt 'Pawns in the ...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qo3AgpTDfhU
A history of the New World Order — Part I - Michael Journalhttps://www.michaeljournal.org/articles/world-government/item/a-history-of-the-new-world-order-part-i
Adam Weishaupt Biography - Facts, Childhood, Family Life ...https://www.thefamouspeople.com/profiles/adam-weishaupt-3498.php
🌸
Illuminati founder Adam Weishaupt identified
women as society's Achille's heel:
"There is no way of influencing men so powerfully as by means of the women. These should therefore be our chief study; we should insinuate ourselves into their good opinion, give them hints of emancipation from the tyranny of public opinion, and of standing up for themselves; it will be an immense relief to their enslaved minds to be freed from any one bond of restraint, and it will fire them the more, and cause them to work for us with zeal, without knowing that they do so; for they will only be indulging their own desire of personal admiration."
Woman's natural role is to nurture husband and children and to be cherished in return. Weishaupt reasoned correctly that if the Illuminati (Freemasons) could alienate them from this role,
they could become a powerful subversive tool
for world revolution.
Thank God, there are many exceptions. Brilliant courageous women like Carrie Madej, Judy Mikovitz and Celeste Solum are leading the exposure of the covid hoax.
Elizabeth Dilling, Edith Star Miller, Paquita de Shismareff and Nesta Webster were pioneers in exposing the Judeo Masonic conspiracy.
(Another indication of women's stupidity is their embrace of feminism and "sexual liberation" which amounts to giving away what men most desire and getting virtually nothing in return. Sexual intercourse is an act of male possession and female surrender.
This is LOVE. For a woman to be possessed and then tossed aside like a piece of garbage is self-defeating. By not insisting on courtship, love and marriage, they are complicit in their own destruction and social isolation i.e. no family.
It's all in a day's work for the Satanists who control our minds.)
🌸
Dr. Henry Makow Comment ...
🌸
Women are not like men. A lot suffer from Personality Deficit Disorder.
The lights are on, but no one is home.
One woman I lived with was a head-turner.
But as time passed, I realized I had bought a shiny red sports car with no engine under the hood.
This is a polite way of saying many women are stupid and men have to manage them.
They are still loving, useful and lovable. Are they stupider than men?
Judging from their wider acceptance of the covid hoax, I suspect that politically they are.
🌸
Stupid Liberal Women
Destroyed the World
By Mike Stone
🌸
Dr. Henry Makow Comment ...
🌸
Women are not like men. A lot suffer from Personality Deficit Disorder.
The lights are on, but no one is home.
One woman I lived with was a head-turner.
But as time passed, I realized I had bought a shiny red sports car with no engine under the hood.
This is a polite way of saying many women are stupid and men have to manage them.
They are still loving, useful and lovable. Are they stupider than men?
Judging from their wider acceptance of the covid hoax, I suspect that politically they are.
🌸
Stupid Liberal Women
Destroyed the World
By Mike Stone
🌸
How many votes did Sleepy Joe Biden get in the 2020 election? 30 million? 40 million? 50 million? Let's say 50 million.
Most likely, he received less votes than that, but for the sake of argument, let's assume 50 million. That's an awful lot of votes. An awful lot of people who hate America. An awful lot of people who hate Christianity. An awful lot of people who hate themselves. And here's the kicker: upwards of 70% of those alleged 50 million votes were cast by white liberals.
What's more, white liberals didn't just vote for Biden, they played major roles in every facet of the stolen election. Without their assistance, it's most likely the overthrow of our government would not have succeeded.
It was Kathryn Murdoch, the white liberal wife of James Murdoch, the white liberal owner of Fox News, who tweeted out, "We did it," before the theft was even complete. She donated 1.2 million to the Biden campaign.
White liberals are major supporters of the riots, the looting and the violence our country has experienced over the last twelve months and more. It's selfish white liberals, safe and smug in their gated communities, who oppose a wall on our southern border.
It's selfish white liberals, cowering behind their double masks and face shields,
who want the rest of us to sacrifice our health and lives by getting jabbed so they can feel safe.
It's selfish white liberals who are now a menace to society.
Think about it. Who's more likely to complain about you to Human Resources and try to get you fired: a white conservative, a person of color - either liberal or conservative, or a selfish white liberal? Who's more likely to report you to the PC Internet Police and try to get you cancelled?
Who's more likely to roll their eyes and mouth off when they see you without a mask? I think you know the answer to all of these questions.
What's especially appalling are the actions of selfish white liberal women. They've betrayed their children (both aborted and living), betrayed their country, and betrayed God. It was a white liberal woman judge who ignored the pleas of Amanda Broderick not to remove the ankle bracelet of her husband after he was arrested for sexually assaulting their 16-year-old daughter.
Judge Karen Sage, ordered the bracelet removed anyway and Stephen Broderick promptly murdered his wife, his daughter and the daughter's boyfriend.
It was a group of selfish white liberal women who, only days ago, organized a rally for a motorist shot by police after he opened fire at them. That is, until they discovered the motorist was white. When they found that out, they immediately cancelled their rally.
Where did all of these selfish white liberal women come from? Why have they turned traitor on their own people? Why are they in open rebellion against God?
Your guess is as good as mine.
But it's safe to say that without them -
without the multitude of selfish white liberal women in this country -
we would not be experiencing any of the problems of mass immigration,
widespread crime,
children born out of wedlock or being raised by single parents,
the rise of pornography,
poverty in our inner cities,
riots and looting across the country,
and the complete breakdown of society.
As a character in my novel "Based" so eloquently put it: "Left-leaning white women? They don't care. Despite having every advantage and privilege in the world, despite having Mary, and St. Anne, and St. Theresa and all the other saints throughout history as guides and role models for how they should live their lives, despite all that and more, they've become the most vile, the most disgusting, the most despicable life form on the planet."
If you're a single white male reading this; if you're a decent guy looking for love and female companionship, I feel sorry for you.
The odds of your finding a like-minded white girl -
a girl who honors God, the family, and the rule of law -
are slim to none and falling lower by the day.
If you do find one, get down on your knees and thank God in Heaven,
because you've just won the lottery.
If you're a single white female reading this; a nice girl looking for love and male companionship,
I feel doubly sorry for you.
Your mating pool has been reduced to a pit of soy-ingesting,
selfish white girly-men who care more about the latest Marvel or Star Wars movie
than they do about starting a family.
Should any of us be surprised by the Men Go Their Own Way movement?
It's fuelled entirely by selfish white liberal women.
Should any us be surprised by the intense hatred other races have for white people? It's fuelled almost entirely by selfish white liberals.
Now that selfish white liberals have destroyed the United States of America and handed it over to the communists, what can we expect?
One thing we all know is coming is the quick and inevitable eradication of selfish white liberals. Easily swayed and manipulated by their masters, their usefulness will be complete when the takeover is complete. They will be dealt with in the old communist way: they will be lined up against a wall and shot. I for one will not shed a tear.
Mike Stone is the author of "Reversing the Side Effects of the COVID-19 Vaccine: How to Heal Yourself from Adverse Reactions to the Trump Vaccine and Protect Yourself from Shedding," available here.
And the author of Based, a young adult novel about race, dating and growing up in America, and A New America, the first novel of the Alt-Right, a dark comedy set on Election Day 2016 in Los Angeles - - Available on Amazon.
https://www.henrymakow.com/2021/08/Stupid-White-Liberal-Women-Destroyed-the-US.html
Most likely, he received less votes than that, but for the sake of argument, let's assume 50 million. That's an awful lot of votes. An awful lot of people who hate America. An awful lot of people who hate Christianity. An awful lot of people who hate themselves. And here's the kicker: upwards of 70% of those alleged 50 million votes were cast by white liberals.
What's more, white liberals didn't just vote for Biden, they played major roles in every facet of the stolen election. Without their assistance, it's most likely the overthrow of our government would not have succeeded.
It was Kathryn Murdoch, the white liberal wife of James Murdoch, the white liberal owner of Fox News, who tweeted out, "We did it," before the theft was even complete. She donated 1.2 million to the Biden campaign.
White liberals are major supporters of the riots, the looting and the violence our country has experienced over the last twelve months and more. It's selfish white liberals, safe and smug in their gated communities, who oppose a wall on our southern border.
It's selfish white liberals, cowering behind their double masks and face shields,
who want the rest of us to sacrifice our health and lives by getting jabbed so they can feel safe.
It's selfish white liberals who are now a menace to society.
Think about it. Who's more likely to complain about you to Human Resources and try to get you fired: a white conservative, a person of color - either liberal or conservative, or a selfish white liberal? Who's more likely to report you to the PC Internet Police and try to get you cancelled?
Who's more likely to roll their eyes and mouth off when they see you without a mask? I think you know the answer to all of these questions.
What's especially appalling are the actions of selfish white liberal women. They've betrayed their children (both aborted and living), betrayed their country, and betrayed God. It was a white liberal woman judge who ignored the pleas of Amanda Broderick not to remove the ankle bracelet of her husband after he was arrested for sexually assaulting their 16-year-old daughter.
Judge Karen Sage, ordered the bracelet removed anyway and Stephen Broderick promptly murdered his wife, his daughter and the daughter's boyfriend.
It was a group of selfish white liberal women who, only days ago, organized a rally for a motorist shot by police after he opened fire at them. That is, until they discovered the motorist was white. When they found that out, they immediately cancelled their rally.
Where did all of these selfish white liberal women come from? Why have they turned traitor on their own people? Why are they in open rebellion against God?
Your guess is as good as mine.
But it's safe to say that without them -
without the multitude of selfish white liberal women in this country -
we would not be experiencing any of the problems of mass immigration,
widespread crime,
children born out of wedlock or being raised by single parents,
the rise of pornography,
poverty in our inner cities,
riots and looting across the country,
and the complete breakdown of society.
As a character in my novel "Based" so eloquently put it: "Left-leaning white women? They don't care. Despite having every advantage and privilege in the world, despite having Mary, and St. Anne, and St. Theresa and all the other saints throughout history as guides and role models for how they should live their lives, despite all that and more, they've become the most vile, the most disgusting, the most despicable life form on the planet."
If you're a single white male reading this; if you're a decent guy looking for love and female companionship, I feel sorry for you.
The odds of your finding a like-minded white girl -
a girl who honors God, the family, and the rule of law -
are slim to none and falling lower by the day.
If you do find one, get down on your knees and thank God in Heaven,
because you've just won the lottery.
If you're a single white female reading this; a nice girl looking for love and male companionship,
I feel doubly sorry for you.
Your mating pool has been reduced to a pit of soy-ingesting,
selfish white girly-men who care more about the latest Marvel or Star Wars movie
than they do about starting a family.
Should any of us be surprised by the Men Go Their Own Way movement?
It's fuelled entirely by selfish white liberal women.
Should any us be surprised by the intense hatred other races have for white people? It's fuelled almost entirely by selfish white liberals.
Now that selfish white liberals have destroyed the United States of America and handed it over to the communists, what can we expect?
One thing we all know is coming is the quick and inevitable eradication of selfish white liberals. Easily swayed and manipulated by their masters, their usefulness will be complete when the takeover is complete. They will be dealt with in the old communist way: they will be lined up against a wall and shot. I for one will not shed a tear.
Mike Stone is the author of "Reversing the Side Effects of the COVID-19 Vaccine: How to Heal Yourself from Adverse Reactions to the Trump Vaccine and Protect Yourself from Shedding," available here.
And the author of Based, a young adult novel about race, dating and growing up in America, and A New America, the first novel of the Alt-Right, a dark comedy set on Election Day 2016 in Los Angeles - - Available on Amazon.
https://www.henrymakow.com/2021/08/Stupid-White-Liberal-Women-Destroyed-the-US.html
🌸
Manu ... Vedic TEXT.
Manu ... Vedic TEXT.
🌸
🌸
🌸
🌸
🌸
🌸
🌸
🌸
🌸
🌸
🌸
The Tragedy of Humanity
🌸
No Other Creatures on this Earth
Only Women is Killing
Their Own Children
🌸
10 Reasons Why Abortion Is Evil
https://www.tfp.org/10-reasons-why-abortion-is-evil/
🌸
For a Free PDF version of “10 Reasons Why Abortion Is Evil”, Click Here.
🌸
https://tfpstudentaction.org/blog/10-reasons-why-abortion-is-evil-not-a-pro-choice
🌸
https://www.proclaimanddefend.org/2019/05/29/crucial-reasons-why-abortion-is-evil/
🌸
The Tragedy of Humanity
🌸
No Other Creatures on this Earth
Only Women is Killing
Their Own Children
🌸
10 Reasons Why Abortion Is Evil
https://www.tfp.org/10-reasons-why-abortion-is-evil/
🌸
For a Free PDF version of “10 Reasons Why Abortion Is Evil”, Click Here.
🌸
https://tfpstudentaction.org/blog/10-reasons-why-abortion-is-evil-not-a-pro-choice
🌸
https://www.proclaimanddefend.org/2019/05/29/crucial-reasons-why-abortion-is-evil/
🌸
Why Abortion is Evil.pdf | |
File Size: | 135 kb |
File Type: |
🌸
INFANTICIDE AND ABORTION.
by
Dr. John Harvey Kellogg
1881
🌸
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/19924/19924-h/19924-h.htm#chapg
🌸
Not a modern crime--Causes of the crime--The nature of the crime--Instruments of crime--Results of this unnatural crime--An unwelcome child--The remedy--Murder by proxy
🌸
INFANTICIDE AND ABORTION.
by
Dr. John Harvey Kellogg
1881
🌸
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/19924/19924-h/19924-h.htm#chapg
🌸
Not a modern crime--Causes of the crime--The nature of the crime--Instruments of crime--Results of this unnatural crime--An unwelcome child--The remedy--Murder by proxy
🌸
INFANTICIDE AND ABORTION.
Few but medical men are aware of the enormous proportions which have been assumed by these terrible crimes during the present century. That they are increasing with fearful rapidity and have really reached such a magnitude as to seriously affect the growth of civilized nations, and to threaten their very existence, has become a patent fact to observing physicians. The crime itself differs little, in reality, from that considered in the last section, the prevention of conception. It is, in fact, the same crime postponed till a later period.
We quote the following eloquent words on this subject:--
"Of all the sins, physical and moral against man and God, I know of none so utterly to be condemned as the very common one of the destruction of the child while yet in the womb of the mother. So utterly repugnant is it that I can scarcely express the loathing with which I approach the subject. Murder!—murder in cold blood, without cause, of an unknown child; one's nearest relative; in fact, part of one's very being; actually having, not only one's own blood in its being, but that blood momentarily interchanging! Good God! Does it seem possible that such depravity can exist in a parent's breast—in a mother's heart!
"'Tis for no wrong that it has committed that its sweet life is so cruelly taken away. Its coming is no disgrace; its creation was not in sin, but—its mother 'don't want to be bothered with any more brats; can hardly take care of what she has got; is going to Europe in the spring.'
"We can forgive the poor deluded girl—seduced, betrayed, abandoned—who, in her wild frenzy, destroys the mute evidence of her guilt. We have only sympathy and sorrow for her. But for the married shirk who disregards her divinely-ordained duty, we have nothing but contempt, even if she be the lordly woman of fashion, clothed in purple and fine linen. If glittering gems adorn her person, within there is foulness and squalor."[30]
Not a Modern Crime.
Although this crime has attained remarkable proportions in modern times, it is not a new one by any means, as the following paragraph will suffice to show:--
"Infanticide and exposure were also the custom among the Romans, Medes, Canaanites,
Babylonians, and other Eastern nations, with the exception of the Israelites and Egyptians. The Scandinavians killed their offspring from pure fantasy. The Norwegians, after having carefully swaddled their children, put some food into their mouths, placed them under the roots of trees or under the rocks to preserve them from ferocious beasts. Infanticide was also permitted among the Chinese, and we saw, during the last century, vehicles going round the streets of Pekin daily to collect the bodies of the dead infants.
To-day there exist foundling hospitals to receive children abandoned by their parents. The same custom is also observed in Japan, in the isles of the Southern Ocean, at Otaheite, and among several savage nations of North America. It is related of the Jaggers of Guinea, that they devour their own children."[31]
The Greeks practiced infanticide systematically, their laws at one time requiring the destruction of crippled or weakly children. Among all the various nations, the general object of the crime seems to have been to avoid the trouble of rearing the children, or to avoid a surplus, objects not far different from those had in view by those who practice the same crimes at the present time.
The destruction of the child after the mother has felt its movements is termed infanticide; before that time it is commonly known as abortion. It is a modern notion that the child possesses no soul or individual life until the period of quickening, an error which we have already sufficiently exposed.
The ancients, with just as much reason, contended that no distinct life was present until after birth. Hence it was that they could practice without scruple the crime of infanticide to prevent too great increase of population. "Plato and Aristotle were advocates of this practice, and these Stoics justified this monstrous practice by alleging that the child only acquired a soul at the moment when it ceased to have uterine life and commenced to respire. From hence it resulted that, the child not being animated, its destruction was no murder."
The prevalence of this crime will be indicated by the following observations from the most reliable sources:--
"We know that in certain countries abortion is practiced in a manner almost public, without speaking of the East, where it has, so to speak, entered into the manners of the country. We see it in America, in a great city like New York, constituting a regular business and not prevented, where it has enriched more than one midwife."
"England does not yield to Germany or France in the frequency of the crime of infanticide."[32]
."Any statistics attainable are very incomplete. False certificates are daily given by attending physicians. Men, if they are only rich enough, die of 'congestion of the brain,' not 'delirium tremens;' and women, similarly situated, do not die from the effects of abortion, but of 'inflammation of the bowels,' etc."
"Infanticide, as it is generally considered (destroying a child after quickening), is of very rare occurrence in New York, whereas abortions (destroying the embryo before quickening) are of daily habit in the families of the best informed and most religious; among those abounding in wealth, as well as among the poor and needy."[33]
"Perhaps only medical men will credit the assertion that the frequency of this form of destroying human life exceeds all others by at least fifty per cent, and that not more than one in a thousand of the guilty parties receive any punishment by the hand of civil law. But there is a surer mode of punishment for the guilty mother in the self-executing laws of nature."[34]
"From a very large verbal and written correspondence in this and other States, I am satisfied that we have become a nation of murderers."[35]
Said a distinguished clergyman of Brooklyn in a sermon, "Why send missionaries to India when child-murder is here of daily, almost hourly, occurrence; aye, when the hand that puts money into the contribution-box to-day, yesterday or a month ago, or to-morrow, will murder her own unborn offspring?
"The Hindoo mother, when she abandons her babe upon the sacred Ganges, is, contrary to her heart, obeying a supposed religious law, and you desire to convert her to your own worship of the Moloch of Fashion and Laziness and love of Greed. Out upon such hypocrisy!"
Writers tell us that it has even become the boast of many women that they "know too much to have babies."
Says the learned Dr. Storer, "Will the time come, think ye, when husbands can no longer, as they now frequently do, commit the crime of rape upon their unwilling wives, and persuade them or compel them to allow a still more dreadful violence to be wreaked upon the children nestling within them—children fully alive from the very moment of conception, that have already been fully detached from all organic connection with their parent, and only re-attached to her for the purposes of nutriment and growth, and to destroy whom 'is a crime of the same nature, both against our Maker and society, as to destroy an infant, a child, or a man?'"[36]
"Is It I?" Says another well-known author, "Ladies boast to each other of the impunity with which they have aborted, as they do of their expenditures, of their dress, of their success in society. There is a fashion in this, as in all other female customs, good and bad. The wretch whose account with the Almighty is heaviest with guilt too often becomes a heroine."[37]
A Woman's Thoughts about Women.
Causes of the Crime.--
Many influences may combine to cause the mother ruthlessly to destroy her helpless child: as, to conceal the results of sin; to avoid the burdens of maternity; to secure ease and freedom to travel, etc., or even from a false idea that maternity is vulgar; but it is true, beyond all question, that the primary cause of the sin is far back of all these influences. The most unstinted and scathing invectives are used in characterizing the criminality of a mother who takes the life of her unborn babe; but a word is seldom said of the one who forced upon her the circumstances which gave the unfortunate one existence.
Though doctors, ministers, and moralists have said much on this subject, and written more, it is reasonable to suppose that they will never accomplish much of anything in the direction of reform until they recognize the part the man acts in all of these sad cases, and begin to demand reform where it is most needed, and where its achievement will effect the most good. As was observed in the remarks upon the subject of "Prevention of Conception," this evil has its origin in "marital excesses," and in a disregard of the natural law which makes the female the sole proprietor of her own body, and gives to her the right to refuse the approaches of the male when unprepared to receive them without doing violence to the laws of her being.
The Nature of the Crime.
"The married and well-to-do, who by means of medicines and operations produce abortions at early periods of pregnancy, have no excuse except the pretense that they do not consider it murder until the child quickens.
"No, not murder, you say, for 'there has not been any life in the child.' Do not attempt to evade, even to man, a crime which cannot be hidden from the All-seeing. The poor mother has not herself felt the life of the child perhaps, but that is a quibble only of the laws of man, founded indeed upon the view, now universally recognized as incorrect, that the child's life began when its movements were first strong enough to be perceptible. There is, in fact, no moment after conception when it can be said that the child has not life, and the crime of destroying human life is as heinous and as sure before the period of 'quickening' has been attained as afterward.
But you still defend your horrible deed by saying, 'Well, if there be, as you say, this mere animal life, equivalent at the most to simple vitality, there is no mind, no soul destroyed, and therefore, there is no crime committed.' Just so surely as one would destroy and root out of existence all the fowl in the world by destroying all the eggs in existence, so certain is it that you do by your act destroy the animal man in the egg, and the soul which animates it. When is the period that intelligence comes to the infant? Are its feeble first strugglings any evidence of its presence? Has it any appreciable quantity at birth?
Has it any valuable, useful quantity even when a year old? When, then, is it, that destruction is harmless or comparatively sinless? While awaiting your metaphysical answer, I will tell you when it is sinful. Murder is always sinful, and murder is the willful destruction of a human being at any period of its existence, from its earliest germinal embryo to its final, simple, animal existence in aged decrepitude and complete mental imbecility."[38]
"There are those who would fain make light of this crime by attempting to convince themselves and others that a child, while in embryo, has only a sort of vegetative life, not yet endowed with thought, and the ability to maintain an independent existence. If such a monstrous philosophy as this presents any justification for such an act, then the killing of a newly-born infant, or of an idiot, may be likewise justified.
The destruction of the life of an unborn human being, for the reason that it is small, feeble, and innocently helpless, rather aggravates than palliates the crime. Every act of this kind, with its justification, is obviously akin to that savage philosophy which accounts it a matter of no moment, or rather a duty, to destroy feeble infants, or old, helpless fathers and mothers."[39]
Instruments of Crime.
"The means through which abortions are effected are various. Sometimes it is through potent drugs, extensively advertised in newspapers claiming to be moral!—the advertisements so adroitly worded as to convey under a caution the precise information required of the liability of the drug to produce miscarriages. Sometimes the information is conveyed through secret circulars; but more commonly the deed is consummated by professed abortionists, who advertise themselves as such through innuendo, or through gaining this kind of repute by the frequent commission of the act. Not a few women, deterred by lingering modesty or some sense of shame, attempt and execute it upon themselves, and then volunteer to instruct and encourage others to go and do likewise."[40]
Results of this Unnatural Crime.
It is the universal testimony of physicians that the effects of abortion are almost as deadly upon the mother as upon the child. The amount of suffering is vastly greater; for that of the child, if it suffer at all, is only momentary, in general, while the mother is doomed to a life of suffering, of misery, if she survives the shock of the terrible outrage against her nature. It has been proved by statistics that the danger of immediate death is fifteen times as great as in natural childbirth.
A medical author of note asserts that a woman suffers more injury from one abortion than she would from twenty normal births. Says Dr. Gardner on this point:--
"We know that the popular idea is that women are worn out by the toil and wear connected with the raising of large families, and we can willingly concede something to this statement; but it is certainly far more observable that the efforts at the present day, made to avoid propagation, are ten thousand-fold more disastrous to the health and constitution, to say nothing of the demoralization of mind and heart, which cannot be estimated by red cheeks or physical vigor."
An Unwelcome Child.
But suppose the mother does not succeed in her attempts against the life of her child, as she may not; what fearful results may follow! Who can doubt that the murderous intent of the mother will be stamped indelibly upon the character of the unwelcome child, giving it a natural propensity for the commission of murderous deeds?
Then again—sickening thought—suppose the attempts to destroy the child are unsuccessful, resulting only in horrid mutilation of its tender form; when such a child is born, what terrible evidences may it bear in its crippled and misshapen body of the cruel outrage perpetrated upon it! That such cases do occur is certain from the following narrative, which we might confirm by others similar in character:--
"A lady, determined not to have any more children, went to a professed abortionist, and he attempted to effect the desired end by violence. With a pointed instrument the attempt was again and again made, but without the looked-for result. So vigorously was the effort made, that, astonished at no result being obtained, the individual stated that there must be some mistake, that the lady could not be pregnant, and refused to perform any further operations.
Partially from doubt and partially from fear, nothing further was attempted; and in due process of time the woman was delivered of an infant, shockingly mutilated, with one eye entirely put out, and the brain so injured that this otherwise robust child was entirely wanting in ordinary sense. This poor mother, it would seem, needs no future punishment for her sin. Ten years face to face with this poor idiot, whose imbecility was her direct work—has it not punished her sufficiently?"
The Remedy.
Whether this gigantic evil can ever be eradicated, is exceedingly doubtful. To effect its cure would be to make refined Christians out of brutal sensualists; to emancipate woman from the enticing, alluring slavery of fashion; to uproot false ideas of life and its duties,—in short, to revolutionize society. The crime is perpetrated in secret. Many times no one but the criminal herself is cognizant of the evil deed. Only occasionally do cases come near enough to the surface to be dimly discernible; hence the evident inefficiency of any civil legislation.
But the evil is a desperate one, and is increasing; shall no attempt be made to check the tide of crime and save the sufferers from both physical and spiritual perdition? An effort should be made, at least. Let every Christian raise the note of warning. From every Christian pulpit let the truth be spoken in terms too plain for misapprehension. Let those who are known to be guilty of this most revolting crime be looked upon as murderers, as they are; and let their real moral status be distinctly shown.
All of these means will do something to effect a reform; but the radical cure of the evil will only be found in the principles suggested in the section devoted to the consideration of "Marital Excesses." The adoption of those principles and strict adherence to them would effectually prevent the occurrence of circumstances which are the occasion of abortions and infanticides.
Murder by Proxy.
"There is, at the present time, a kind of infanticide, which, although it is not so well known, is even more dangerous, because done with impunity. There are parents who recoil with horror at the idea of destroying their offspring, although they would greatly desire to be disembarrassed of them, who yet place them without remorse with nurses who enjoy the sinister reputation of never returning the children to those who have intrusted them to their care. These unfortunate little beings are condemned to perish from inanition and bad treatment.
"The number of these innocent victims is greater than would be imagined, and very certainly exceeds that of the marked infanticides sent by the public prosecutor to the Court of the Assizes."
Few but medical men are aware of the enormous proportions which have been assumed by these terrible crimes during the present century. That they are increasing with fearful rapidity and have really reached such a magnitude as to seriously affect the growth of civilized nations, and to threaten their very existence, has become a patent fact to observing physicians. The crime itself differs little, in reality, from that considered in the last section, the prevention of conception. It is, in fact, the same crime postponed till a later period.
We quote the following eloquent words on this subject:--
"Of all the sins, physical and moral against man and God, I know of none so utterly to be condemned as the very common one of the destruction of the child while yet in the womb of the mother. So utterly repugnant is it that I can scarcely express the loathing with which I approach the subject. Murder!—murder in cold blood, without cause, of an unknown child; one's nearest relative; in fact, part of one's very being; actually having, not only one's own blood in its being, but that blood momentarily interchanging! Good God! Does it seem possible that such depravity can exist in a parent's breast—in a mother's heart!
"'Tis for no wrong that it has committed that its sweet life is so cruelly taken away. Its coming is no disgrace; its creation was not in sin, but—its mother 'don't want to be bothered with any more brats; can hardly take care of what she has got; is going to Europe in the spring.'
"We can forgive the poor deluded girl—seduced, betrayed, abandoned—who, in her wild frenzy, destroys the mute evidence of her guilt. We have only sympathy and sorrow for her. But for the married shirk who disregards her divinely-ordained duty, we have nothing but contempt, even if she be the lordly woman of fashion, clothed in purple and fine linen. If glittering gems adorn her person, within there is foulness and squalor."[30]
Not a Modern Crime.
Although this crime has attained remarkable proportions in modern times, it is not a new one by any means, as the following paragraph will suffice to show:--
"Infanticide and exposure were also the custom among the Romans, Medes, Canaanites,
Babylonians, and other Eastern nations, with the exception of the Israelites and Egyptians. The Scandinavians killed their offspring from pure fantasy. The Norwegians, after having carefully swaddled their children, put some food into their mouths, placed them under the roots of trees or under the rocks to preserve them from ferocious beasts. Infanticide was also permitted among the Chinese, and we saw, during the last century, vehicles going round the streets of Pekin daily to collect the bodies of the dead infants.
To-day there exist foundling hospitals to receive children abandoned by their parents. The same custom is also observed in Japan, in the isles of the Southern Ocean, at Otaheite, and among several savage nations of North America. It is related of the Jaggers of Guinea, that they devour their own children."[31]
The Greeks practiced infanticide systematically, their laws at one time requiring the destruction of crippled or weakly children. Among all the various nations, the general object of the crime seems to have been to avoid the trouble of rearing the children, or to avoid a surplus, objects not far different from those had in view by those who practice the same crimes at the present time.
The destruction of the child after the mother has felt its movements is termed infanticide; before that time it is commonly known as abortion. It is a modern notion that the child possesses no soul or individual life until the period of quickening, an error which we have already sufficiently exposed.
The ancients, with just as much reason, contended that no distinct life was present until after birth. Hence it was that they could practice without scruple the crime of infanticide to prevent too great increase of population. "Plato and Aristotle were advocates of this practice, and these Stoics justified this monstrous practice by alleging that the child only acquired a soul at the moment when it ceased to have uterine life and commenced to respire. From hence it resulted that, the child not being animated, its destruction was no murder."
The prevalence of this crime will be indicated by the following observations from the most reliable sources:--
"We know that in certain countries abortion is practiced in a manner almost public, without speaking of the East, where it has, so to speak, entered into the manners of the country. We see it in America, in a great city like New York, constituting a regular business and not prevented, where it has enriched more than one midwife."
"England does not yield to Germany or France in the frequency of the crime of infanticide."[32]
."Any statistics attainable are very incomplete. False certificates are daily given by attending physicians. Men, if they are only rich enough, die of 'congestion of the brain,' not 'delirium tremens;' and women, similarly situated, do not die from the effects of abortion, but of 'inflammation of the bowels,' etc."
"Infanticide, as it is generally considered (destroying a child after quickening), is of very rare occurrence in New York, whereas abortions (destroying the embryo before quickening) are of daily habit in the families of the best informed and most religious; among those abounding in wealth, as well as among the poor and needy."[33]
"Perhaps only medical men will credit the assertion that the frequency of this form of destroying human life exceeds all others by at least fifty per cent, and that not more than one in a thousand of the guilty parties receive any punishment by the hand of civil law. But there is a surer mode of punishment for the guilty mother in the self-executing laws of nature."[34]
"From a very large verbal and written correspondence in this and other States, I am satisfied that we have become a nation of murderers."[35]
Said a distinguished clergyman of Brooklyn in a sermon, "Why send missionaries to India when child-murder is here of daily, almost hourly, occurrence; aye, when the hand that puts money into the contribution-box to-day, yesterday or a month ago, or to-morrow, will murder her own unborn offspring?
"The Hindoo mother, when she abandons her babe upon the sacred Ganges, is, contrary to her heart, obeying a supposed religious law, and you desire to convert her to your own worship of the Moloch of Fashion and Laziness and love of Greed. Out upon such hypocrisy!"
Writers tell us that it has even become the boast of many women that they "know too much to have babies."
Says the learned Dr. Storer, "Will the time come, think ye, when husbands can no longer, as they now frequently do, commit the crime of rape upon their unwilling wives, and persuade them or compel them to allow a still more dreadful violence to be wreaked upon the children nestling within them—children fully alive from the very moment of conception, that have already been fully detached from all organic connection with their parent, and only re-attached to her for the purposes of nutriment and growth, and to destroy whom 'is a crime of the same nature, both against our Maker and society, as to destroy an infant, a child, or a man?'"[36]
"Is It I?" Says another well-known author, "Ladies boast to each other of the impunity with which they have aborted, as they do of their expenditures, of their dress, of their success in society. There is a fashion in this, as in all other female customs, good and bad. The wretch whose account with the Almighty is heaviest with guilt too often becomes a heroine."[37]
A Woman's Thoughts about Women.
Causes of the Crime.--
Many influences may combine to cause the mother ruthlessly to destroy her helpless child: as, to conceal the results of sin; to avoid the burdens of maternity; to secure ease and freedom to travel, etc., or even from a false idea that maternity is vulgar; but it is true, beyond all question, that the primary cause of the sin is far back of all these influences. The most unstinted and scathing invectives are used in characterizing the criminality of a mother who takes the life of her unborn babe; but a word is seldom said of the one who forced upon her the circumstances which gave the unfortunate one existence.
Though doctors, ministers, and moralists have said much on this subject, and written more, it is reasonable to suppose that they will never accomplish much of anything in the direction of reform until they recognize the part the man acts in all of these sad cases, and begin to demand reform where it is most needed, and where its achievement will effect the most good. As was observed in the remarks upon the subject of "Prevention of Conception," this evil has its origin in "marital excesses," and in a disregard of the natural law which makes the female the sole proprietor of her own body, and gives to her the right to refuse the approaches of the male when unprepared to receive them without doing violence to the laws of her being.
The Nature of the Crime.
"The married and well-to-do, who by means of medicines and operations produce abortions at early periods of pregnancy, have no excuse except the pretense that they do not consider it murder until the child quickens.
"No, not murder, you say, for 'there has not been any life in the child.' Do not attempt to evade, even to man, a crime which cannot be hidden from the All-seeing. The poor mother has not herself felt the life of the child perhaps, but that is a quibble only of the laws of man, founded indeed upon the view, now universally recognized as incorrect, that the child's life began when its movements were first strong enough to be perceptible. There is, in fact, no moment after conception when it can be said that the child has not life, and the crime of destroying human life is as heinous and as sure before the period of 'quickening' has been attained as afterward.
But you still defend your horrible deed by saying, 'Well, if there be, as you say, this mere animal life, equivalent at the most to simple vitality, there is no mind, no soul destroyed, and therefore, there is no crime committed.' Just so surely as one would destroy and root out of existence all the fowl in the world by destroying all the eggs in existence, so certain is it that you do by your act destroy the animal man in the egg, and the soul which animates it. When is the period that intelligence comes to the infant? Are its feeble first strugglings any evidence of its presence? Has it any appreciable quantity at birth?
Has it any valuable, useful quantity even when a year old? When, then, is it, that destruction is harmless or comparatively sinless? While awaiting your metaphysical answer, I will tell you when it is sinful. Murder is always sinful, and murder is the willful destruction of a human being at any period of its existence, from its earliest germinal embryo to its final, simple, animal existence in aged decrepitude and complete mental imbecility."[38]
"There are those who would fain make light of this crime by attempting to convince themselves and others that a child, while in embryo, has only a sort of vegetative life, not yet endowed with thought, and the ability to maintain an independent existence. If such a monstrous philosophy as this presents any justification for such an act, then the killing of a newly-born infant, or of an idiot, may be likewise justified.
The destruction of the life of an unborn human being, for the reason that it is small, feeble, and innocently helpless, rather aggravates than palliates the crime. Every act of this kind, with its justification, is obviously akin to that savage philosophy which accounts it a matter of no moment, or rather a duty, to destroy feeble infants, or old, helpless fathers and mothers."[39]
Instruments of Crime.
"The means through which abortions are effected are various. Sometimes it is through potent drugs, extensively advertised in newspapers claiming to be moral!—the advertisements so adroitly worded as to convey under a caution the precise information required of the liability of the drug to produce miscarriages. Sometimes the information is conveyed through secret circulars; but more commonly the deed is consummated by professed abortionists, who advertise themselves as such through innuendo, or through gaining this kind of repute by the frequent commission of the act. Not a few women, deterred by lingering modesty or some sense of shame, attempt and execute it upon themselves, and then volunteer to instruct and encourage others to go and do likewise."[40]
Results of this Unnatural Crime.
It is the universal testimony of physicians that the effects of abortion are almost as deadly upon the mother as upon the child. The amount of suffering is vastly greater; for that of the child, if it suffer at all, is only momentary, in general, while the mother is doomed to a life of suffering, of misery, if she survives the shock of the terrible outrage against her nature. It has been proved by statistics that the danger of immediate death is fifteen times as great as in natural childbirth.
A medical author of note asserts that a woman suffers more injury from one abortion than she would from twenty normal births. Says Dr. Gardner on this point:--
"We know that the popular idea is that women are worn out by the toil and wear connected with the raising of large families, and we can willingly concede something to this statement; but it is certainly far more observable that the efforts at the present day, made to avoid propagation, are ten thousand-fold more disastrous to the health and constitution, to say nothing of the demoralization of mind and heart, which cannot be estimated by red cheeks or physical vigor."
An Unwelcome Child.
But suppose the mother does not succeed in her attempts against the life of her child, as she may not; what fearful results may follow! Who can doubt that the murderous intent of the mother will be stamped indelibly upon the character of the unwelcome child, giving it a natural propensity for the commission of murderous deeds?
Then again—sickening thought—suppose the attempts to destroy the child are unsuccessful, resulting only in horrid mutilation of its tender form; when such a child is born, what terrible evidences may it bear in its crippled and misshapen body of the cruel outrage perpetrated upon it! That such cases do occur is certain from the following narrative, which we might confirm by others similar in character:--
"A lady, determined not to have any more children, went to a professed abortionist, and he attempted to effect the desired end by violence. With a pointed instrument the attempt was again and again made, but without the looked-for result. So vigorously was the effort made, that, astonished at no result being obtained, the individual stated that there must be some mistake, that the lady could not be pregnant, and refused to perform any further operations.
Partially from doubt and partially from fear, nothing further was attempted; and in due process of time the woman was delivered of an infant, shockingly mutilated, with one eye entirely put out, and the brain so injured that this otherwise robust child was entirely wanting in ordinary sense. This poor mother, it would seem, needs no future punishment for her sin. Ten years face to face with this poor idiot, whose imbecility was her direct work—has it not punished her sufficiently?"
The Remedy.
Whether this gigantic evil can ever be eradicated, is exceedingly doubtful. To effect its cure would be to make refined Christians out of brutal sensualists; to emancipate woman from the enticing, alluring slavery of fashion; to uproot false ideas of life and its duties,—in short, to revolutionize society. The crime is perpetrated in secret. Many times no one but the criminal herself is cognizant of the evil deed. Only occasionally do cases come near enough to the surface to be dimly discernible; hence the evident inefficiency of any civil legislation.
But the evil is a desperate one, and is increasing; shall no attempt be made to check the tide of crime and save the sufferers from both physical and spiritual perdition? An effort should be made, at least. Let every Christian raise the note of warning. From every Christian pulpit let the truth be spoken in terms too plain for misapprehension. Let those who are known to be guilty of this most revolting crime be looked upon as murderers, as they are; and let their real moral status be distinctly shown.
All of these means will do something to effect a reform; but the radical cure of the evil will only be found in the principles suggested in the section devoted to the consideration of "Marital Excesses." The adoption of those principles and strict adherence to them would effectually prevent the occurrence of circumstances which are the occasion of abortions and infanticides.
Murder by Proxy.
"There is, at the present time, a kind of infanticide, which, although it is not so well known, is even more dangerous, because done with impunity. There are parents who recoil with horror at the idea of destroying their offspring, although they would greatly desire to be disembarrassed of them, who yet place them without remorse with nurses who enjoy the sinister reputation of never returning the children to those who have intrusted them to their care. These unfortunate little beings are condemned to perish from inanition and bad treatment.
"The number of these innocent victims is greater than would be imagined, and very certainly exceeds that of the marked infanticides sent by the public prosecutor to the Court of the Assizes."
🌸
🌸
All Women Are Evil
&
Divorce Is Fundamentally A War
🌸
Written by Susan Abrahamson
🌸
All Women Are Evil
&
Divorce Is Fundamentally A War
🌸
Written by Susan Abrahamson
🌸
All Women Are Evil & Divorce Is Fundamentally A War ...
This article is for entertainment only. I am not a lawyer. I am an idiot who knows nothing about the law. If you were to follow any of the ideas raised in this article then you are an idiot. I wrote this story from my bitter and twisted divorce experiences and added to it with a liberal lather of fiction.
So you must accept that these are ramblings, opinions, ideas, dreams and fiction of an insane man and must be treated the same. You must not consider any piece of this article as legal advice in any way shape or form. That’s what lawyers are for. If you need a lawyer, look in the yellow pages.
All Women are evil and you should avoid
getting married for any reason.
Did you know, women really are evil? I know It sounds absurd – But take it from me and the thousands of divorced men who found out the hard way – Women really are evil.
Unlike the movies, you cannot spot their degree of evilness easily. You cannot spot it when you are courting them, nor when you pop the question or say I do. What may surprise you is that you cannot even spot it after you are married. The only time you will see the true nature of your be troth’s evil is during your divorce. Their evil breath will tear the flesh from your bones like a modern day dragon.
All married people must understand this – you WILL get divorced. Unless you are some kind of superman it is going to happen to you.
Current US statistics show that 67% of marriages will fail.
The mathematical odds are that you will be getting divorced. So if you are not yet divorced, you better start planning it. I hope that day never comes for you, but if I was able to tell you that the odds of you getting cancer and dying are 67% what would you do about it ? I have to believe that you are going to try to stop smoking, exercise more, drink large amounts of OJ, healthy diet and generally enjoy life more and maybe , maybe – you have a chance of beating it.
So what does the average man do in reaction to learning that the odds are that he will be divorced – usually nothing – sometimes something, always too late. Schmuck.
US divorce law is woefully outdated.
It dates from a time when man went to work and little women stayed at home. The law is from a time when women were not allowed to vote and were kept as chattels by their owners, their husbands. Times and people have changed drastically, but the law remains in its antiquated form.
To be more precise, the law has degenerated into becoming clearly anti-man. It almost always favors the woman at divorce. She is favored to care for the child. She is seen as needing money to keep herself regardless of whether you have children or she has a job. The state sees her as needing protection. She needs to be protected from the cock. Now, this really is absurd.
The divorce process is a war
As in any war let us first understand who the enemy combatants are and what are the terms of this war.
What are the goals of the combatants ?
The enemy is clearly indicated – Its obviously women and they are more often than not the complainant in a divorce hearing. The defendants are Men and usually have the most to lose so the word “defense” is quite apt.
The armies are the lawyers and the battleground is mostly outside the court room.
Understanding Your Enemy Is
The First Step To Conquering Them
Let us understand the enemy a little better. The enemy is not your regular Iraqi conscripts – no sir – these are intelligent and wily combatants, spies as it were – who have been operating behind enemy lines for some time – usually many years, without blowing their cover. The IRA did the same thing in the UK for many years – they would send in “Sitters” to the United Kingdom, who would build in a life in the new country, sometimes ten or twenty years would pass and they would have no contact with their violent cohorts of old. Then, one night, they would be called upon for terrorist activities, if they refused their family would be shot.
There are many some strong parallels to be drawn between a terrorist organization and an estranged wife, neither will stop until their mission is successful.
So the estranged wife knows your every move, your every weapon and your every weakness.
They also know the location of your military and civilians.
They know just how you will react to given situations and they are going to use all of this knowledge to their advantage in their campaign against you.
The enemy has a their mercenary, the gun for hire as it were, the attorney.
Now understand the attorney has nothing personal against the husband, they are merely professionals at work – They only make money at an hourly rate, so it is in their interests to prolong this war as long as they can.
Every attorney has the Hundred Years War in mind when they pick up a new case. They will examine the case it for all its worth (Intelligence being supplied by the enemy) and assess how much financial damage their enemy can take, before it surrenders. But they cannot force a surrender too soon, otherwise the billable hours will be too low and this opportunity must not be squandered. So begins their long drawn-out game of war. There is no Geneva convention here, nothing to save you.
Men in The Divorce Trenches Are Ten Times More Likely TO
Kill Themselves – Often in Murder/Suicide
One statistic I came across is what the suicide rate is during divorce for men and what is for women. I haven’t been able to find out the exact statistic foe women, but it has been documented for men. I just know that men would be the loser, and not by a little either.
It amazes me why men still get married at all ... Men really don’t get anything out of marriage – other than regular sex and some companionship. When that disappears (As it often does) they are left with nothing. Men are just not cut out for the war of divorce that follows marriage. The enemy, it seems, are perfect naturals for it.
Susan Abrahamson
Recent written research pieces have been printed in Wired Magazine, Tech Review, Business Insider and Cat Fancier. Although the latter story did not require any hands-on tech knowledge, Mr Tiddles gave it his full approval and his fuzzy logic is really rather cute.
This article is for entertainment only. I am not a lawyer. I am an idiot who knows nothing about the law. If you were to follow any of the ideas raised in this article then you are an idiot. I wrote this story from my bitter and twisted divorce experiences and added to it with a liberal lather of fiction.
So you must accept that these are ramblings, opinions, ideas, dreams and fiction of an insane man and must be treated the same. You must not consider any piece of this article as legal advice in any way shape or form. That’s what lawyers are for. If you need a lawyer, look in the yellow pages.
All Women are evil and you should avoid
getting married for any reason.
Did you know, women really are evil? I know It sounds absurd – But take it from me and the thousands of divorced men who found out the hard way – Women really are evil.
Unlike the movies, you cannot spot their degree of evilness easily. You cannot spot it when you are courting them, nor when you pop the question or say I do. What may surprise you is that you cannot even spot it after you are married. The only time you will see the true nature of your be troth’s evil is during your divorce. Their evil breath will tear the flesh from your bones like a modern day dragon.
All married people must understand this – you WILL get divorced. Unless you are some kind of superman it is going to happen to you.
Current US statistics show that 67% of marriages will fail.
The mathematical odds are that you will be getting divorced. So if you are not yet divorced, you better start planning it. I hope that day never comes for you, but if I was able to tell you that the odds of you getting cancer and dying are 67% what would you do about it ? I have to believe that you are going to try to stop smoking, exercise more, drink large amounts of OJ, healthy diet and generally enjoy life more and maybe , maybe – you have a chance of beating it.
So what does the average man do in reaction to learning that the odds are that he will be divorced – usually nothing – sometimes something, always too late. Schmuck.
US divorce law is woefully outdated.
It dates from a time when man went to work and little women stayed at home. The law is from a time when women were not allowed to vote and were kept as chattels by their owners, their husbands. Times and people have changed drastically, but the law remains in its antiquated form.
To be more precise, the law has degenerated into becoming clearly anti-man. It almost always favors the woman at divorce. She is favored to care for the child. She is seen as needing money to keep herself regardless of whether you have children or she has a job. The state sees her as needing protection. She needs to be protected from the cock. Now, this really is absurd.
The divorce process is a war
As in any war let us first understand who the enemy combatants are and what are the terms of this war.
What are the goals of the combatants ?
The enemy is clearly indicated – Its obviously women and they are more often than not the complainant in a divorce hearing. The defendants are Men and usually have the most to lose so the word “defense” is quite apt.
The armies are the lawyers and the battleground is mostly outside the court room.
Understanding Your Enemy Is
The First Step To Conquering Them
Let us understand the enemy a little better. The enemy is not your regular Iraqi conscripts – no sir – these are intelligent and wily combatants, spies as it were – who have been operating behind enemy lines for some time – usually many years, without blowing their cover. The IRA did the same thing in the UK for many years – they would send in “Sitters” to the United Kingdom, who would build in a life in the new country, sometimes ten or twenty years would pass and they would have no contact with their violent cohorts of old. Then, one night, they would be called upon for terrorist activities, if they refused their family would be shot.
There are many some strong parallels to be drawn between a terrorist organization and an estranged wife, neither will stop until their mission is successful.
So the estranged wife knows your every move, your every weapon and your every weakness.
They also know the location of your military and civilians.
They know just how you will react to given situations and they are going to use all of this knowledge to their advantage in their campaign against you.
The enemy has a their mercenary, the gun for hire as it were, the attorney.
Now understand the attorney has nothing personal against the husband, they are merely professionals at work – They only make money at an hourly rate, so it is in their interests to prolong this war as long as they can.
Every attorney has the Hundred Years War in mind when they pick up a new case. They will examine the case it for all its worth (Intelligence being supplied by the enemy) and assess how much financial damage their enemy can take, before it surrenders. But they cannot force a surrender too soon, otherwise the billable hours will be too low and this opportunity must not be squandered. So begins their long drawn-out game of war. There is no Geneva convention here, nothing to save you.
Men in The Divorce Trenches Are Ten Times More Likely TO
Kill Themselves – Often in Murder/Suicide
One statistic I came across is what the suicide rate is during divorce for men and what is for women. I haven’t been able to find out the exact statistic foe women, but it has been documented for men. I just know that men would be the loser, and not by a little either.
It amazes me why men still get married at all ... Men really don’t get anything out of marriage – other than regular sex and some companionship. When that disappears (As it often does) they are left with nothing. Men are just not cut out for the war of divorce that follows marriage. The enemy, it seems, are perfect naturals for it.
- ← Crime and eBay – Does eBay Have Less Overall Crime Than Craigslist?
- The Fundamentals of Divorce AKA World War 3 →
Susan Abrahamson
Recent written research pieces have been printed in Wired Magazine, Tech Review, Business Insider and Cat Fancier. Although the latter story did not require any hands-on tech knowledge, Mr Tiddles gave it his full approval and his fuzzy logic is really rather cute.
🌸
🌸
🌸
🌸
🌸
16 000 Wives
🌸
16 000 Wives
🌸
See I have not read Bhagavatham. I don’t know much about it. But what I have heard is Lord Krishna freed present days Iraq. Iraq was ruled by a person called Narakasur. He had 16000 wives and he made everybody miserable.
The whole population was miserable. It’s in Iraq. His son was Bhagadatta. And because of Bhagadatta that city came to be known as Baghdad. So what Iraq has to face now, it has faced 5000-years ago also. 5000-years ago, Iraq had same type of regime.
When I was in Iraq, they told me in Kurdistan there are a hundred villages, where there is not a single male because Saddam Hussein killed every male. In those hundred villages, the amount of suffering people had! We went through some of the villages and (there were) all women only women.
They came up and they were talking. They were sharing their story. It is chilling that in this age such a demonic mindset can exist. You have heard about similar incidence in Uganda as well. Someone stored many skulls in the fridge. Haven’t you heard this? Yah. And in Cambodia, millions of people, even today there is an exhibition in Cambodia.
One communist general in Cambodia, he told everyone to go and do farming. And people didn’t know farming. People, who were businessmen, who didn’t know anything about farming, he forced them. Those who said no, he killed them off. Millions were killed. One-third of the population of Cambodia was killed by one man.
So such a demonic mindset existed 5000-years-ago also. And he had married 16000 women, captured them, and made them his slaves. So when he was slain by Sri Krishna, he freed them. The 16000 women then said now we will all commit suicide. They all wanted to commit mass suicide. Because in those days there was a taboo about woman without her husband.
They were not having such a respect in the society, and especially a wife of a demonic person has no respect. So they all told Krishna, “Because our families will not take us because we have been married to this guy. And the world will not accept us because they will see us as the wife of this demonic person who has destroyed the lives of millions. So it is better we die.”
Then Sri Krishna said to them, “No. I will give my surname to you. You need not call yourself as so-and-so, wife of Narakasura. In that place you can call you are my wife. Because Krishna was a very well respected and highly acknowledged person. Then, they can live with dignity so he said he gave dignity to their life by giving his name or his sanction to be their husband or to treat him as husband. This is one story, one aspect.
So all those 16000 concubines were given a respectable life by Sri Krishna by marrying them. Isn’t that such a noble thing he did? So he gave them new life. But his real wives were Rukamini, Satyabhama, and Jambavathi.
The whole population was miserable. It’s in Iraq. His son was Bhagadatta. And because of Bhagadatta that city came to be known as Baghdad. So what Iraq has to face now, it has faced 5000-years ago also. 5000-years ago, Iraq had same type of regime.
When I was in Iraq, they told me in Kurdistan there are a hundred villages, where there is not a single male because Saddam Hussein killed every male. In those hundred villages, the amount of suffering people had! We went through some of the villages and (there were) all women only women.
They came up and they were talking. They were sharing their story. It is chilling that in this age such a demonic mindset can exist. You have heard about similar incidence in Uganda as well. Someone stored many skulls in the fridge. Haven’t you heard this? Yah. And in Cambodia, millions of people, even today there is an exhibition in Cambodia.
One communist general in Cambodia, he told everyone to go and do farming. And people didn’t know farming. People, who were businessmen, who didn’t know anything about farming, he forced them. Those who said no, he killed them off. Millions were killed. One-third of the population of Cambodia was killed by one man.
So such a demonic mindset existed 5000-years-ago also. And he had married 16000 women, captured them, and made them his slaves. So when he was slain by Sri Krishna, he freed them. The 16000 women then said now we will all commit suicide. They all wanted to commit mass suicide. Because in those days there was a taboo about woman without her husband.
They were not having such a respect in the society, and especially a wife of a demonic person has no respect. So they all told Krishna, “Because our families will not take us because we have been married to this guy. And the world will not accept us because they will see us as the wife of this demonic person who has destroyed the lives of millions. So it is better we die.”
Then Sri Krishna said to them, “No. I will give my surname to you. You need not call yourself as so-and-so, wife of Narakasura. In that place you can call you are my wife. Because Krishna was a very well respected and highly acknowledged person. Then, they can live with dignity so he said he gave dignity to their life by giving his name or his sanction to be their husband or to treat him as husband. This is one story, one aspect.
So all those 16000 concubines were given a respectable life by Sri Krishna by marrying them. Isn’t that such a noble thing he did? So he gave them new life. But his real wives were Rukamini, Satyabhama, and Jambavathi.
🌸
Aristotle Onassis
🌸
Aristotle Onassis
🌸
🌸
🌸
🌸
Letter from a Lady
I think something triggered an "emotional flashback" in me,
and that's why I started to look at you differently than before...
The Myers Briggs personality test gives real results, it is used in every school, every university, every major company and corporation in America.
I've completed about 30 different versions of it and I've always got a consistent score,
it's not a hocus-pocus. There is no right or wrong personality type, I told you.
They all have their strengths. There are tests in English on the net ...
Would you like to fill in some of them?... :)
I'm wondering what to do ...
Travel or not, I'm not the type of woman who can survive even half a day in a caravan, sorry,
but I have to disappoint you.
I'm really sorry you don't know anything about me yet.
For example, I can't cook, I can't iron, I've never lived with anyone, I've never lived alone ...
I have long red nails, I like high heels, I always wear make-up, I love dogs,
I'm a committed animal rights activist and I don't generally care what anyone thinks.
When I get pissed off I tend to be very rude and abrasive, but only to men.
I feel sorry for women, I don't mess with them. I'm a radical feminist, I've never wanted to get married, only on paper... Trouble? :)
Why don't you ever ask me anything about myself?
🌸
Letter from a Lady
I think something triggered an "emotional flashback" in me,
and that's why I started to look at you differently than before...
The Myers Briggs personality test gives real results, it is used in every school, every university, every major company and corporation in America.
I've completed about 30 different versions of it and I've always got a consistent score,
it's not a hocus-pocus. There is no right or wrong personality type, I told you.
They all have their strengths. There are tests in English on the net ...
Would you like to fill in some of them?... :)
I'm wondering what to do ...
Travel or not, I'm not the type of woman who can survive even half a day in a caravan, sorry,
but I have to disappoint you.
I'm really sorry you don't know anything about me yet.
For example, I can't cook, I can't iron, I've never lived with anyone, I've never lived alone ...
I have long red nails, I like high heels, I always wear make-up, I love dogs,
I'm a committed animal rights activist and I don't generally care what anyone thinks.
When I get pissed off I tend to be very rude and abrasive, but only to men.
I feel sorry for women, I don't mess with them. I'm a radical feminist, I've never wanted to get married, only on paper... Trouble? :)
Why don't you ever ask me anything about myself?
🌸