🌸
What Is a Virus? - Dr. Lanka - VIRUS. - What is Coronavirus?
Virus Refuted. - Viruses - 1. - Viruses - 2. - Viruses - 3
Understanding Covid19. - The Virus Theory - Simple - Educational
🌸
What Is a Virus? - Dr. Lanka - VIRUS. - What is Coronavirus?
Virus Refuted. - Viruses - 1. - Viruses - 2. - Viruses - 3
Understanding Covid19. - The Virus Theory - Simple - Educational
🌸
By. Dr. Stefan Lanka - German Virologist
🌸
🌸
🌸
The Virus Misconception
🌸
The Causes of Disease - Toxicity and Deficiency
🌸
Dr. Stefan Lanka - Reveals the Truth
🌸
By Health & Money News / July 22, 2020 / News /
https://healthandmoneynews.wordpress.com/2020/07/22/
🌸
The Virus Misconception
🌸
The Causes of Disease - Toxicity and Deficiency
🌸
Dr. Stefan Lanka - Reveals the Truth
🌸
By Health & Money News / July 22, 2020 / News /
https://healthandmoneynews.wordpress.com/2020/07/22/
🌸
🌸
Dr. Stefan Lanka wrote
a reward of 100,000 euros
for those who could prove
the existence and size of the measles virus
by means of a "scientific publication".
🌸
a reward of 100,000 euros
for those who could prove
the existence and size of the measles virus
by means of a "scientific publication".
🌸
In 2011, a biologist and opponent of vaccination named Stefan Lanka wrote a reward of 100,000 euros for those who could prove the existence and size of the measles virus by means of a "scientific publication".
Lanka is, among other things, the author of a book entitled "The measles fraud". A young doctor, David Bardens, then sent Lanka six studies - but he did not pay. Bardens then sued Lanka.
In March 2015, the Ravensburg Regional Court ruled that Lanka had to pay the 100,000 euros, including interest.
The court found the existence of the measles virus to be proven. An expert opinion was drawn up for the judgment, which “came to the conclusion that, although not an article in itself is sufficient to provide evidence, the statements of the six publications submitted - adequately documented by adequate and scientifically correct experiments - did Combination demonstrated the existence of the measles virus as well as its specific infectivity and its approximate diameter.
” Stefan Lanka appealed against this judgment and won in February 2016 at the Stuttgart Higher Regional Court . Barden's lawsuit was dismissed as the plaintiff and he was ordered to pay the costs. The case also caused a stir in the media . Bardens did not meet the formal criteria for the tender However, the reason for this judgment is not that the Higher Regional Court considers that the measles virus does not exist. It does not contradict the Ravensburg Regional Court on this point
: "The Regional Court's assessment of the evidence that the expert opinion obtained proves that the publications submitted by the plaintiff as a whole prove the existence and pathogenicity of the measles virus [...] not objectionable in the result. "
The criterion that Bardens had not met according to the court: he should not have submitted six, but only one "scientific publication in the sense of an original work". In addition, according to Lanka, this publication should have been from the Robert Koch Institute. According to an article in the Deutsche Apotheker-Zeitung , the judge said the decision was a purely legal one, based on the wording of the tender. With that, Stefan Lanka won in court, the lawsuit against him was rejected. None of the courts involved, however, agreed with him that there was no measles virus.
According to the Stuttgart Higher Regional Court, Stefan Lanka never intended to be convinced of the existence of the virus. In the judgment of 2016 it is verbatim: "The competition therefore forms part of the campaign carried out by the defendant as an opponent of the measles virus vaccination. He is clearly not interested in the fact that his claim - which is anyway presented as irrefutable - about the non-existence of the measles virus is refuted." source.
https://correctiv.org/faktencheck/medizin-und-gesundheit/2019/11/25/nein-dieses-gerichtsurteil-beweist-nicht-dass-das-masern-virus-nicht-existiert
Lanka is, among other things, the author of a book entitled "The measles fraud". A young doctor, David Bardens, then sent Lanka six studies - but he did not pay. Bardens then sued Lanka.
In March 2015, the Ravensburg Regional Court ruled that Lanka had to pay the 100,000 euros, including interest.
The court found the existence of the measles virus to be proven. An expert opinion was drawn up for the judgment, which “came to the conclusion that, although not an article in itself is sufficient to provide evidence, the statements of the six publications submitted - adequately documented by adequate and scientifically correct experiments - did Combination demonstrated the existence of the measles virus as well as its specific infectivity and its approximate diameter.
” Stefan Lanka appealed against this judgment and won in February 2016 at the Stuttgart Higher Regional Court . Barden's lawsuit was dismissed as the plaintiff and he was ordered to pay the costs. The case also caused a stir in the media . Bardens did not meet the formal criteria for the tender However, the reason for this judgment is not that the Higher Regional Court considers that the measles virus does not exist. It does not contradict the Ravensburg Regional Court on this point
: "The Regional Court's assessment of the evidence that the expert opinion obtained proves that the publications submitted by the plaintiff as a whole prove the existence and pathogenicity of the measles virus [...] not objectionable in the result. "
The criterion that Bardens had not met according to the court: he should not have submitted six, but only one "scientific publication in the sense of an original work". In addition, according to Lanka, this publication should have been from the Robert Koch Institute. According to an article in the Deutsche Apotheker-Zeitung , the judge said the decision was a purely legal one, based on the wording of the tender. With that, Stefan Lanka won in court, the lawsuit against him was rejected. None of the courts involved, however, agreed with him that there was no measles virus.
According to the Stuttgart Higher Regional Court, Stefan Lanka never intended to be convinced of the existence of the virus. In the judgment of 2016 it is verbatim: "The competition therefore forms part of the campaign carried out by the defendant as an opponent of the measles virus vaccination. He is clearly not interested in the fact that his claim - which is anyway presented as irrefutable - about the non-existence of the measles virus is refuted." source.
https://correctiv.org/faktencheck/medizin-und-gesundheit/2019/11/25/nein-dieses-gerichtsurteil-beweist-nicht-dass-das-masern-virus-nicht-existiert
🌸
Paper - Virus Dr. Stephan Lanka .pdf | |
File Size: | 1654 kb |
File Type: |
🌸
The Virus Misconception
is at the Heart of
Operation Coronavirus ...
🌸
The Virus Misconception
is at the Heart of
Operation Coronavirus ...
🌸
... because without the concept of germ theory and without the horror story of the killer virus, most people would not buy the NWO-directed official narrative of COVID19.
In a previous article on the nature of the virus, I have discussed the heroic efforts of German virologist Dr. Stefan Lanka, who won a landmark case in 2017 which went all the way to the German Supreme Court. Lanka proved in the highest court of the land that measles was not caused by a virus, and that there was in fact no such thing as a measles virus.
Lanka is still busy working, and he wrote this article earlier this year (translated into English here) entitled ““The Misconception called Virus”” in which he explains the history of how mainstream science went horribly wrong with its conclusions (really assumptions) to demonize the humble virus and to falsely ascribe pathogenicity to it when there is none.
In a previous article on the nature of the virus, I have discussed the heroic efforts of German virologist Dr. Stefan Lanka, who won a landmark case in 2017 which went all the way to the German Supreme Court. Lanka proved in the highest court of the land that measles was not caused by a virus, and that there was in fact no such thing as a measles virus.
Lanka is still busy working, and he wrote this article earlier this year (translated into English here) entitled ““The Misconception called Virus”” in which he explains the history of how mainstream science went horribly wrong with its conclusions (really assumptions) to demonize the humble virus and to falsely ascribe pathogenicity to it when there is none.
The Virus Misconception:
The Killer Virus Story vs. Deficiency and Toxicity
The Killer Virus Story vs. Deficiency and Toxicity
Lanka’s main point throughout the article is this: when modern scientists are working with diseased tissue, they think the presence of a virus is causing the disease, instead of realizing that the tissue in question has been cut off and isolated from its host, then doused with antibiotics, and that this separation and poison make it diseased and kill it, rather than any virus. Lanka writes:
“All claims about viruses as pathogens are wrong and are based on easily recognizable, understandable and verifiable misinterpretations … All scientists who think they are working with viruses in laboratories are actually working with typical particles of specific dying tissues or cells which were prepared in a special way.
They believe that those tissues and cells are dying because they were infected by a virus. In reality, the infected cells and tissues were dying because they were starved and poisoned as a consequence of the experiments in the lab.”
” … the death of the tissue and cells takes place in the exact same manner when no “infected” genetic material is added at all. The virologists have apparently not noticed this fact. According to … scientific logic and the rules of scientific conduct, control experiments should have been carried out. In order to confirm the newly discovered method of so-called “virus propagation” … scientists would have had to perform additional experiments, called negative control experiments, in which they would add sterile substances … to the cell culture.”
“These control experiment have never been carried out by the official “science” to this day. During the measles virus trial, I commissioned an independent laboratory to perform this control experiment and the result was that the tissues and cells die due to the laboratory conditions in the exact same way as when they come into contact with alleged “infected” material.”
In other words, the studied cells and tissues die with or without the presence of a virus in exactly the same way; therefore, the virus cannot be the cause of the morbidity and mortality. Interestingly, this exactly what many health experts have stated, namely that there are only 2 causes of disease: deficiency and toxicity. For instance, Charlotte Gerson (who took over running the Gerson Clinic from her brilliant father Max) said this about disease and cancer.
Removing cells or tissue from the body and thus cutting them off from their energy/nutrient supply will quickly lead to deficiency; injecting antibiotics into the mixture is toxicity; thus there is no solid proof a virus is causing disease when there is already deficiency and toxicity present. This is the key point of the virus misconception.
How the Virus Misconception Has Roots in 1858
and Became Entrenched in 1954
Lanka traces back the development of the virus misconception to 1858 and to the ‘cell theory’ of Rudolf Virchow, who proposed a theory that all disease and all life originates from a single cell, which is somehow hijacked by a virus that weakens it and propagates itself.
Lanka points out 2 problems with this:
“The cell theory was only originated because Rudolf Virchow suppressed crucial discoveries about tissues. The findings and insights with respect to the structure, function and central importance of tissues in the creation of life, which were already known in 1858, comprehensively refute the cell theory and the subsequently derived genetic, immune and cancer therapies.
“The infection theories were only established as a global dogma through the concrete policies and eugenics of the Third Reich. Before 1933, scientists dared to contradict this theory; after 1933, these critical scientists were silenced.”
By “infection theories” Lanka means germ theory, the prevailing theory of modern Western Medicine. Lanka then describes how a paradigm shift in the perception of the virus occurred during 1952-1954:
“Until 1952, a virus was defined as a pathogenic poison in the form of a protein, which as an enzyme caused damage in an unknown manner, which could cause disease and be transmissible. After 1953, the year in which the alleged DNA in the form [of] an alleged alpha helix was publicly announced, the idea of a virus became a malignant genotype wrapped in proteins. Thus, a paradigm shift took place between 1952 and 1954 regarding the image of a virus.”
He talks about how theory become dogma in the
Church of Mainstream Science (aka Scientism):
“This completely unscientific approach originated in June 1954, when an unscientific and refutable speculative article was published, according to which the death of tissue in a test tube was considered … possible evidence for the presence of a virus. Six months later, on 10 December 1954, the main author of this opinion was awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine for another equally speculative theory.
The speculation from June 1954 was then raised to a scientific fact and became a dogma which has never been challenged to this date. Since June 1954, the death of tissue and cells in a test tube has been regarded as proof for the existence of a virus.”
Returning to Koch’s Postulates:
No Isolation, No Purification
As I covered in COVID-19 Umbrella Term to Operate a Fake Pandemic: Not 1 Disease, Not 1 Cause, today’s mainstream scientists are skipping the all important 2nd step of Koch’s postulates: the isolation and purification of the virus. This isn’t something you can just gloss over or forget to do, like accidentally forgetting your umbrella on a rainy day and getting a bit wet.
This is the absolutely quintessential part of determining if there is a new virus and if it causing causing disease.
It’s the sine qua non. If you can’t isolate it, you have FAILED to prove anything, because the budding offshoot you think is an invading virus could easily be a exosome or particle being produced by the body itself.
This is why all the COVID propaganda has conveniently glossed over the fact that there are no electron microscope images of SARS-CoV-2, since the electron microscope is an extremely important tool in the 1st step of Koch’s postulates, the identification.
Lanka continues:
“… a virus has never been isolated according to the meaning of the word isolation, and it has never been photographed and biochemically characterised as a whole unique structure.
The electron micrographs of the alleged viruses show in reality quite normal cellular particles from dying tissues and cells, and most photos show only a computer model (CGI – computer generated images).”
So What Does All This Have to Do with COVID?
So to bring this back to the current plandemic, all of the same assumptions and lack of evidence are in play when it comes to COVID:
“Individual molecules are extracted from the particles of dead tissue and cells, they are misinterpreted to be parts of a virus and are theoretically put together into a virus model … The consensus-finding process for the measles “virus”, in which the participants debated in order to determine what belonged to the virus and what didn’t, lasted for decades.
With the apparently new China Coronavirus 2019 (2019-nCoV, meanwhile renamed), this consensus-finding process lasts only a few mouse clicks.
With only a few mouse clicks as well, a program can create any virus by putting together molecules of short parts of nucleic acids from dead tissue and cells with a determined biochemical composition, thus arranging them as desired into a longer genotype which is then declared to be the complete genome of the new virus … in this process of theoretical construction of the “viral DNA”, those sequences that don’t fit are “smoothed out” and missing ones are added.
Thus, a DNA sequence is invented which doesn’t exist in reality and which was never discovered and scientifically demonstrated as a whole.”
So basically, mainstream Chinese scientists who work under the same theory as mainstream Western scientists invented a new theoretical model for SARS-CoV-2, and proclaimed a novel coronavirus, but all without the electron micrographs to actually back it up.
This entire process has extremely interesting parallels with the theme of space fakery, whether it’s propagated by NASA or the space agencies of other nations.
We don’t have verifiable images of viruses; we don’t have verifiable whole (non-composite) images of the Earth, or many other space bodies such as moons, planets, etc. Instead we are fed CGIs and told not to question authority. Is this science or is this faith-based Scientism? To what extent are we being manipulated when we are denied real and true photographs of the world around us, both on a micro and macro level? I would argue to a massive extent.
Lanka on the Danger of Vaccines
Our lack of understanding about viruses, disease, the immune system, terrain theory and much more is exploited by Big Pharma to push dangerous medical interventions such as vaccines. Here’s what Lanka has to say about the danger and ineffectiveness of vaccines:
“[A] concoction consisting of dying tissue and cells from monkeys, bovine foetuses and toxic antibiotics … is being used as a “live” vaccine, because it is supposed to consist of so-called “attenuated” viruses … [this] toxic mixture full of foreign proteins, foreign nucleic acids (DNA/RNA), cytotoxic antibiotics, microbes and spores of all types is being labelled a “live vaccine.”
It is implanted in children through vaccination mainly into the muscles, in a quantity which if it were injected into the veins would immediately lead to certain death …
The verifiable facts demonstrate the danger and negligence of these scientists and politicians, who claim that vaccines are safe, have little or no side-effects, and would protect from a disease.
None of these claims is true and scientific, on the contrary: upon precise scientific analysis, one finds that vaccines are useless and the respective literature admits to the lack of any evidence in their favour.”
Final Thoughts
The virus misconception has been with us a long time. As insane as the current fear-based, mask-wearing, social-distancing submission is, there are those people who are using Operation Coronavirus as a chance to wake up.
While some go deeper into unconsciousness and look to new protective products (“upgrade your mask for our patent-pending powered air-filtration protective shield (N95)”), others have seen the coronavirus coup for what it truly is: a chance to roll out all kinds of control architecture while people sleepwalk in fear.
It is always a good idea to question the base assumptions of any governmental pronouncement, because almost always, it can open up a portal that leads to the truth.
“All claims about viruses as pathogens are wrong and are based on easily recognizable, understandable and verifiable misinterpretations … All scientists who think they are working with viruses in laboratories are actually working with typical particles of specific dying tissues or cells which were prepared in a special way.
They believe that those tissues and cells are dying because they were infected by a virus. In reality, the infected cells and tissues were dying because they were starved and poisoned as a consequence of the experiments in the lab.”
” … the death of the tissue and cells takes place in the exact same manner when no “infected” genetic material is added at all. The virologists have apparently not noticed this fact. According to … scientific logic and the rules of scientific conduct, control experiments should have been carried out. In order to confirm the newly discovered method of so-called “virus propagation” … scientists would have had to perform additional experiments, called negative control experiments, in which they would add sterile substances … to the cell culture.”
“These control experiment have never been carried out by the official “science” to this day. During the measles virus trial, I commissioned an independent laboratory to perform this control experiment and the result was that the tissues and cells die due to the laboratory conditions in the exact same way as when they come into contact with alleged “infected” material.”
In other words, the studied cells and tissues die with or without the presence of a virus in exactly the same way; therefore, the virus cannot be the cause of the morbidity and mortality. Interestingly, this exactly what many health experts have stated, namely that there are only 2 causes of disease: deficiency and toxicity. For instance, Charlotte Gerson (who took over running the Gerson Clinic from her brilliant father Max) said this about disease and cancer.
Removing cells or tissue from the body and thus cutting them off from their energy/nutrient supply will quickly lead to deficiency; injecting antibiotics into the mixture is toxicity; thus there is no solid proof a virus is causing disease when there is already deficiency and toxicity present. This is the key point of the virus misconception.
How the Virus Misconception Has Roots in 1858
and Became Entrenched in 1954
Lanka traces back the development of the virus misconception to 1858 and to the ‘cell theory’ of Rudolf Virchow, who proposed a theory that all disease and all life originates from a single cell, which is somehow hijacked by a virus that weakens it and propagates itself.
Lanka points out 2 problems with this:
“The cell theory was only originated because Rudolf Virchow suppressed crucial discoveries about tissues. The findings and insights with respect to the structure, function and central importance of tissues in the creation of life, which were already known in 1858, comprehensively refute the cell theory and the subsequently derived genetic, immune and cancer therapies.
“The infection theories were only established as a global dogma through the concrete policies and eugenics of the Third Reich. Before 1933, scientists dared to contradict this theory; after 1933, these critical scientists were silenced.”
By “infection theories” Lanka means germ theory, the prevailing theory of modern Western Medicine. Lanka then describes how a paradigm shift in the perception of the virus occurred during 1952-1954:
“Until 1952, a virus was defined as a pathogenic poison in the form of a protein, which as an enzyme caused damage in an unknown manner, which could cause disease and be transmissible. After 1953, the year in which the alleged DNA in the form [of] an alleged alpha helix was publicly announced, the idea of a virus became a malignant genotype wrapped in proteins. Thus, a paradigm shift took place between 1952 and 1954 regarding the image of a virus.”
He talks about how theory become dogma in the
Church of Mainstream Science (aka Scientism):
“This completely unscientific approach originated in June 1954, when an unscientific and refutable speculative article was published, according to which the death of tissue in a test tube was considered … possible evidence for the presence of a virus. Six months later, on 10 December 1954, the main author of this opinion was awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine for another equally speculative theory.
The speculation from June 1954 was then raised to a scientific fact and became a dogma which has never been challenged to this date. Since June 1954, the death of tissue and cells in a test tube has been regarded as proof for the existence of a virus.”
Returning to Koch’s Postulates:
No Isolation, No Purification
As I covered in COVID-19 Umbrella Term to Operate a Fake Pandemic: Not 1 Disease, Not 1 Cause, today’s mainstream scientists are skipping the all important 2nd step of Koch’s postulates: the isolation and purification of the virus. This isn’t something you can just gloss over or forget to do, like accidentally forgetting your umbrella on a rainy day and getting a bit wet.
This is the absolutely quintessential part of determining if there is a new virus and if it causing causing disease.
It’s the sine qua non. If you can’t isolate it, you have FAILED to prove anything, because the budding offshoot you think is an invading virus could easily be a exosome or particle being produced by the body itself.
This is why all the COVID propaganda has conveniently glossed over the fact that there are no electron microscope images of SARS-CoV-2, since the electron microscope is an extremely important tool in the 1st step of Koch’s postulates, the identification.
Lanka continues:
“… a virus has never been isolated according to the meaning of the word isolation, and it has never been photographed and biochemically characterised as a whole unique structure.
The electron micrographs of the alleged viruses show in reality quite normal cellular particles from dying tissues and cells, and most photos show only a computer model (CGI – computer generated images).”
So What Does All This Have to Do with COVID?
So to bring this back to the current plandemic, all of the same assumptions and lack of evidence are in play when it comes to COVID:
“Individual molecules are extracted from the particles of dead tissue and cells, they are misinterpreted to be parts of a virus and are theoretically put together into a virus model … The consensus-finding process for the measles “virus”, in which the participants debated in order to determine what belonged to the virus and what didn’t, lasted for decades.
With the apparently new China Coronavirus 2019 (2019-nCoV, meanwhile renamed), this consensus-finding process lasts only a few mouse clicks.
With only a few mouse clicks as well, a program can create any virus by putting together molecules of short parts of nucleic acids from dead tissue and cells with a determined biochemical composition, thus arranging them as desired into a longer genotype which is then declared to be the complete genome of the new virus … in this process of theoretical construction of the “viral DNA”, those sequences that don’t fit are “smoothed out” and missing ones are added.
Thus, a DNA sequence is invented which doesn’t exist in reality and which was never discovered and scientifically demonstrated as a whole.”
So basically, mainstream Chinese scientists who work under the same theory as mainstream Western scientists invented a new theoretical model for SARS-CoV-2, and proclaimed a novel coronavirus, but all without the electron micrographs to actually back it up.
This entire process has extremely interesting parallels with the theme of space fakery, whether it’s propagated by NASA or the space agencies of other nations.
We don’t have verifiable images of viruses; we don’t have verifiable whole (non-composite) images of the Earth, or many other space bodies such as moons, planets, etc. Instead we are fed CGIs and told not to question authority. Is this science or is this faith-based Scientism? To what extent are we being manipulated when we are denied real and true photographs of the world around us, both on a micro and macro level? I would argue to a massive extent.
Lanka on the Danger of Vaccines
Our lack of understanding about viruses, disease, the immune system, terrain theory and much more is exploited by Big Pharma to push dangerous medical interventions such as vaccines. Here’s what Lanka has to say about the danger and ineffectiveness of vaccines:
“[A] concoction consisting of dying tissue and cells from monkeys, bovine foetuses and toxic antibiotics … is being used as a “live” vaccine, because it is supposed to consist of so-called “attenuated” viruses … [this] toxic mixture full of foreign proteins, foreign nucleic acids (DNA/RNA), cytotoxic antibiotics, microbes and spores of all types is being labelled a “live vaccine.”
It is implanted in children through vaccination mainly into the muscles, in a quantity which if it were injected into the veins would immediately lead to certain death …
The verifiable facts demonstrate the danger and negligence of these scientists and politicians, who claim that vaccines are safe, have little or no side-effects, and would protect from a disease.
None of these claims is true and scientific, on the contrary: upon precise scientific analysis, one finds that vaccines are useless and the respective literature admits to the lack of any evidence in their favour.”
Final Thoughts
The virus misconception has been with us a long time. As insane as the current fear-based, mask-wearing, social-distancing submission is, there are those people who are using Operation Coronavirus as a chance to wake up.
While some go deeper into unconsciousness and look to new protective products (“upgrade your mask for our patent-pending powered air-filtration protective shield (N95)”), others have seen the coronavirus coup for what it truly is: a chance to roll out all kinds of control architecture while people sleepwalk in fear.
It is always a good idea to question the base assumptions of any governmental pronouncement, because almost always, it can open up a portal that leads to the truth.
🌸
Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles
and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com. Makia is on Steemit.
Sources:
https://davidicke.com/2020/07/23/dr-stefan-lanka-2020-article-busts-the-virus-misconception/
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/deep-down-virus-rabbit-hole-question-everything/
*https://davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Paper-Virus-Lanka-002.pdf
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/covid-19-umbrella-term-fake-pandemic-not-1-disease-cause/
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/toxic-vaccine-adjuvants-the-top-10/
and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com. Makia is on Steemit.
Sources:
https://davidicke.com/2020/07/23/dr-stefan-lanka-2020-article-busts-the-virus-misconception/
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/deep-down-virus-rabbit-hole-question-everything/
*https://davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Paper-Virus-Lanka-002.pdf
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/covid-19-umbrella-term-fake-pandemic-not-1-disease-cause/
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/toxic-vaccine-adjuvants-the-top-10/
🌸
🌸
🌸
Dr Stefan Lanka: Pandemic Theater
🌸
Dr Stefan Lanka: Pandemic Theater
🌸
Dr. Stefan Lanka:
The History of the Infection Theory
(English transcript)
🌸
The History of the Infection Theory
(English transcript)
🌸
BY SACHA DOBLER
Original video “Grippepandemie und Tamiflu” copy here. Dokuments: klein-klein-media.de Translation from German and original subtitled video: Sacha Dobler, AbruptEarthChanges.com
1.08 [time markers of the video]
My name is Stefan Lanka, I am a biologist and virologist. I discovered the first virus, which was in the ocean. That’s how I became involved in this matter. First, I recognized that this virus doesn’t cause any harm. Secondly, the Austrian professor Fritz Pol alerted me to the fact, that something was wrong with the entire AIDS affair and the virus might not even exist at all.
I checked this and realized, that was indeed the case. I thought this couldn’t be and I remained silent for half a year, for I assumed, I misunderstand something. I couldn’t imagine that the entire world would go along with this.
2:00
Then I started researching and became involved in the infection theory. I realized that everything was wrong, it initially started with an error, that then turned into fraud, political fraud already under Otto von Bismarck, this can easily be proven and reconstructed. This fraudulent concept was abandoned after World War II, then reestablished by the Americans in order to provoke fear and to conduct population control.
Copy of the translated video
(original was deleted by Youtube):
2:45
Further, I recognized, as I will demonstrate here, how the infection theory gave rise to the gene theory and the so-called molecular technology and gene manipulation and -technology. Today’s model of the infection theory is used in the form of vaccines, of fear from material contagion, in the form of pandemics, just as in the current one, which is predicted to erupt any moment, or it will erupt in the second phase or even later and that it will then be encountered with the drug called Tamiflu. Incidentally,
Tamiflu stands for toxic amiflue, there was an apparent glitch in the naming process of this chemo-therapeutic drug.
03:32
I’m going to tell the story, how everything developed, in order for you to comprehend, how an error turned into a fraud, a fraud turned into a crime, and how through the industrialization of this crime, the madness developed, a kind of madness that endangers all of us, the entire human race.
04:03
We begin at a point in history of ancient Greece there this concept infection developed. It is the basis of today’s system of medicine that is ruled by systematic fighting and poisoning. It is also why we are supposed to swallow Tamiflu even preemptively and, after the pandemic is declared, it should be take in large quantities.
04:55
Before we delve into ancient Greece: Goethe tried to warn of the 2006 influence pandemic, and also of AIDS and of the swallowing of Tamiflu. He did this in Faust I, not in the first edition, that went through censorship, not in the second, but in the third or fourth edition he included this essential passage, in which he describes how even back then a single doctor killed thousands of people:
First he describes in alchemist’s language, how the Tamiflu and chemotherapy of his time was produced: organic mercury compounds, mixed with sirup, Latwergen stands for sirup mixtures, and these will be the hellish Latwergen in alchemistic language and how they were produced. Here are the important lines:
Here was the medicine: the patients died.
No one asked: who recovered?
(Here was the Tamiflu, the patients died (will die?)
And no one asked: who recovered?
No one asked: is the theory correct? Does the virus exist at all? )
So we roamed, with our hellish pills,
Among the valleys and the hills,
Worse than the pestilence (plague) itself we were.
And we’ll treat the black plague also, a political disease just as AIDS, influenza, SARS, BSE, just as small pox, the collective term of leprosy, from which black plague was derived, and also the collective term of polio.
I myself have poisoned thousands: that’s quite clear:
And now from the withered old must hear
How men praise shameless murderers.
Goethe. He has not been taken seriously ’till today.
Whenever there is a tsunami or an earthquake, I think to myself:
Goethe is speaking again. For he warned and this warning was dismissed.
06:49
How did it get to this, what is the mistake, the overall false assumption? The general false assumption, on which the entire western academic medicine is based on, is this: In the frameworks of the doctrine of juices, it was believed that disease was brought about by an unbalance of juices or fluids in the body.
We have many different fluids in the body, about 270 different types, in the joints, in the eye, sweat glands, digestive glands, fluids of the inner ear, brain fluids,spinal fluids and so on. It was assumed that a non-equilibrium of juices would lead to the development of disease-causing toxins.
And it was believed from experience, that the administration of small amounts of poisons would cause in the body the reaction of production of an antidote, anti-poison. This idea derived from the experience with the cell toxin alcohol.
Consumed in small quantities it can be fun, it can also diminish anxieties and the like, but if a young person who never had been in contact with alcohol, drinks half a bottle of liquor, when he is paralyzed enough to not be able to spit, then his stomach must be pumped empty, otherwise he dies of alcohol poisoning. Jelzin and others, they make world politics after two liters.
08:12
This observation was the basis premise : to ingest a poison little by little. You can try it yourself, quit drinking alcohol for half a year, and then drink two glasses of wine, you’ll almost fall over.
But not because the body made the anti-poison, but because the body is trained, it has prepared the enzymes to quickly process and neutralize and excrete the alcohol. This doctrine of juices in this form is the explicit basis of the entire western academic medicine, including the false believe in an immune system. Why?
They believed, that a disease-causing poison could develop, and if one preemptively took a poison, then the body would make an anti-poison, so one would obtain immunity. And whenever the disease-causing poison arrives, then I’m already invulnerable.
That’s why Rasputin and Napoleon (this can be measured in the hair) frequently took different kinds of toxins in small quantities in order to be immune against a poison attack. But then in the 19th century, when it was possible to detect small amounts of toxins, it was found that in no illness, toxins can be detected. In non of them, until today.
9:56
So the theory proved to be wrong. But the entire thinking was based on it, that means to give mercury compounds preemptively, as in Goethe’s times, so whenever the disease-causing toxin comes about in form of an epidemic, the person is already invulnerable. This perception of epidemics already developed in the history of ancient Greece. It was claimed that the illness demon would possess and defile a person.
From this, the Greek word miasma is derived. Defilement, one is tarnished by the illness demon and one can transmit the disease to others. The disease demon infects me, reproduces within me, and can be passed on to others and disease-causing toxins would be produced. That’s why anti-poisons are administered preemptively, just as Goethe describes it, and the survivors applauded.
“And now from the withered old must hear
How men praise shameless murderers.“
As It were, Goethe revived Paracelsus in the figure of Faust, but he is ashamed of having been celebrated by peasants before, as they call after him: “You saved our lives!“ but thousands perished. He was ashamed of this and sat down with his Atlantus Wagner on this certain rock near the village and meditates and recounts what he did, and what his father had done.
11.56
It had been observed that bacteria produce toxins. This was investigated, and they were all very certain, that bacteria could only produce toxins in the dead body.
That is because bacteria run their metabolism in an aerobic environment and produce substances in the intestines during digestion such as necessary vitamins.
But when these bacteria are deprived of oxygen, which is the case in a dead body after a couple of days, then a few of them can survive, they change their metabolism. Just as the yeast changes its metabolism under exclusion of oxygen to produce the toxic alcohol, in this way these bacteria produce their toxins, but only under complete exclusion of oxygen.
13:03
This was well known, bacteria cannot be the cause of disease. Professor Henle further solidified this knowledge, he phrased his postulates and said: If you claim that bacteria can be transmitted and then produce their poisons, then you need to identify that bacterium in every case of a disease, which you claim was caused by this bacterium.
And that was not the case. Bacteria are only insufficiently identifiable in a test-tube, it can be done only with a few of them. Of all bacteria, which we know based on their performance, only about 2 % are cultivatable and multipliable. And what is defined as a bacterium in the laboratory is not the same as the original bacterium outside. Why?
14:11
Because the idea of bacteria in the lab representing one single type, is a laboratory artifact. For, bacteria exchange information among one another continuously and they change their form and function. This was recently confirmed in a large study: bacteria, as individual as they are in terms of their biochemistry, they are very similar in terms of their nucleic acid.
They adapt. If we extract a bacterium and cultivate it in isolation, it looses its properties after some time and it can’t survive. Thus, I must produce a large quantity of them, freeze them and then I always work with those.
But this already constitutes a massive intervention into nature, and doesn’t represent the reality of bacteria exchanging their information amongst one another, and thus the definition of types that was imposed on them, was not scientifically justifiable.
That was the first problem. For instance, they didn’t manage to find the famous tuberculosis bacterium, the cultivation of which was successfully done by Robert Koch: It could only be found in about half the cases. That remains the same to the present day.
15:46
The second Henle Postulate states: this isolated pathogen must be observed, in case of a bacterium it must be multiplied, and it must be observed whether or not it can do what is assigned to it. In all these experiments they found, the bacteria couldn’t produce toxins in the living organism, only after a few days in the dead body, after an animal or human died. That was also determined, throughout the entire scientific community without exception.
16:23
Henle formulated the third Postulate, which states: Then, the pathogen that was isolated and multiplied, must be injected into an organism and the same disease must develop. And this has never happened, never ever.
17:00
But how did it happen, that suddenly Robert Koch was celebrated as the discoverer of the transmissibility of diseases? That is the question.
17:03
The question is easily answered. Robert Koch deserved reputation for having managed to make photography adaptable to visual microscopy and to make photographs of bacteria. Photography itself had been rediscovered in Europa in 1885.
This brought him much reputation deservedly. Photography was considered to be sacred, no one could imagine that a negative could be retouched, that double exposures could be used, that it could be manipulated. It was deemed as inherently scientific and objective. They simply made claims along with photography, and this acted in a very hypnotic way, much like television today, so people just accepted these claims.
18:00
He simply photographed bacteria that can be found everywhere. From this, two different concepts derived.
Of course, these bacteria don’t cause disease, but the Third Postulate (which states bacteria much cause the same disease) was violated by Koch, he introduced the scientific fraud, that plays the central role until today, in cases like AIDS, vaccination, influenza pandemic, and so on including Tamiflu.
18:41
He said, the inoculation of the test animal with this bacteria culture leads to the development of a SIMILAR illness. Not the same, but a SIMILAR illness. And this is one of the general acts of fraud of the entire infection theory: development of a SIMILAR illness.
Read for yourself, that’s homework number one, don’t just believe me, go the library, read what Robert Koch did.
Anthrax, just one example: he kills mice with corps toxins. This corps poison you can make at home: leave a potato salad standing outside in the summer for a weak, spoiled egg meal, bacteria spores are floating in the air everywhere, they settle, grow, reproduce, they consume the oxygen. They transfer into the anaerobic state, mostly in the centre of the potato salad or the egg meal or in a dead body. And then, toxins are produced.
The toxins themselves they can kill, if this is fed to a person little by little, and the foulness is covered up with strong spices or taste enhancers. In his way, a person can be chronically poisoned, or be caused to suffer severe diarrhea and cramps.
20:10
Koch produces these toxins in a meat broth, as you can replicate at home, he injects them into the vein of a mouse, the mouse dies, the milt is swollen, he extracts the milt of the mouse, and transplants it under the skin of a frog. The frog convulses and dies and this is called skin anthrax. Robert Koch, scientific fraud.
20:42
Now you can imagine which animal experiments were made to claim lung anthrax. The milt of the killed mouse was implanted into the lungs of the frog. That is what is done until the present day, that is what is done in the influenza pandemic:
Animals are being killed with incisions of the trachea, liquids are inserted continuously, the animals die, and then it is claimed, it was the virus. You can study this on our influenza virus information flyer, which is attached to this file. On this you will find the literature on how they operate concerning influenza. No control group animals, if they were to inject ordinary liquids into the animals, the exact same were to happen.
21:32
The second thing that was derived from Germany and Robert Koch, was this: Robert Koch relied on new colorants to be ably to dye bacteria.
And naturally, he received these dyes from the colorant industry. Then, all other medical researcher took the same colorants, took healthy tissue, they acidified the tissue and discovered they had the same coloring reaction and the exact same bacteria can be seen and photographed, just as Robert Koch did.
22:12
But then they also discovered, these dyes killed bacteria by making holes in them, they inhibit the DNA of the bacteria, these can no longer reproduce, the bacteria die. From this, antibiotics were derived, from colorants. BASF, BAYER, IG Farben, Hoechst, Merk and so on.
The pharma- industry was derived from colorant manufacturers based on the infection hypothesis. The American capital built up their parallel structures in Switzerland, in order to keep up with the revolutionary knowledge of the Germans, who were assumed to be capable of having something important just as the H. Bosch process, were nitrogen is extracted from air.
By this, the Germans no longer relied on importing sodium nitrate from Chile for bombs and grenades, as the oceans were blocked. That’s the historic background.
23:24
But why did the German government employ Robert Koch? He already had to flee from Berlin before because he had killed thousand with his magic drug tuberculin against tuberculosis. This drug’s ingredients were kept secret against the law. He fled,
Otto von Bismarck called him back, he desperately needed a pretext against the British who had seized the Suez canal illegally and thus had significant military and political advantages, for they didn’t have to sail around Africa, but they came through the Suez canal from India with their troops and goods, such as spices, serving as anti-oxidants, and the like and they sailed through the calm Mediterran sea.
The German tried to deprive the English form this advantage with the allegation they were bringing home anthrax, smallpox, the black pledge from India. Thus, quarantine was demanded, they weren’t allowed to dock at any Mediterranean port and at Gibraltar they were shot at.
Therefore, Robert Koch, who was on the run, was called back and was offered 100,000 Reichsmark in order to create the argument that the English would bring in black plague, small pox and anthrax, the latter we already discussed. We noted, that this colorant business lead to the emergence of antibiotics, later to the chemotherapy and the weaponized gasses, including the pharma- industry with its entire capital, with more revenue then all military budgets globally combined.
25:18
Robert Koch committed scientific fraud by not upholding the first postulate. He could cultivate some bacteria, which he didn’t find in every case of a disease. This is still done in the same way today. He could never reproduce the disease as in the third postulate, and neither could he again isolate the same pathogen from these organisms. That is the date when the brutal animal experiments were introduced.
26:02
How did the idea of a virus come to life? Koch’s French counterpart was Luis Pasteur, scientific fraudster employed by the French, as the French were at war with Germany in 1872.
The dead were later declared as victims of a small pox epidemic. The Germans claimed it came from France, the French said it came from Germany.
Pasteur, knew from Bechamp and other scientist, what bacteria could do and what they couldn’t do, he first denied the new knowledge in order to play along with the church, he claimed he had proven the primordial creation, only to later take a reverse stand, once he was employed by the state, he said it was all wrong, bacteria are in a continuum, there are spores, they cannot be created in the primordial soup.
Pasteur sold these insights as his own, but he knew what bacteria can and what they cannot do, and has earned some merits for this.
27:16
But the same Pasteur, who knew, that bacteria cannot cause diseases, applied a trick. In order to maintain the model of the doctrine of juices and disease, which the entire western medicine is based on, a disease-causing toxin had to be postulated.
Especially since this concept of pandemics had been used many times to suppress upheavals, to control starvation situations and so on.
It all started, with the early Vatican creating fear of diseases, by claiming the disease is coming from the disease demon, just as in ancient Greece. Thus, in order to establish total control, the early Vatican claimed that illness was a punishment by God.
28:26
This concept was interrupted for a few years by the Stauffers, when emperor Otto, at the re-foundation of the Holy Roman Empire on Jan 1st, 1000 AD employed the French Humanist Gerbert de Aureac for the purpose of establishing a medical system, which was obviously not present before.
For, the military faction, the western Roman wing, had separated from Rome, that is well known. They had only military knowledge, but no technical knowledge, they were separated from the universities and culture. The early gothic was able to build small windows only, no tall buildings, the building plans were useless, whenever the knowledge of craftsmen and engineers, which always must go together, didn’t converge. This is visible in early gothic architecture.
29:33
So, they recruited Gerbert de Aureac, alias Pope Silvester. He brought in the Arabs in each garrison from which the monasteries were derived from, with the aim to obtain the ancient knowledge of the Chinese via the Arabs, who themselves had further developed medicine.
For, in China the concept of contagion didn’t exist, there is the concept of too much and too little energy, there is the influence, latin influenza, by the decrease and increase of light and warmth in spring and autumn, but the idea of contagion plays no role.
Contagion is not part of arjuvedic medicine. The concept of contagion is typically war- oriented, European.
30:12
The idea of disease being something vile was already retracted from by Galenus, the great physician of Marcus Aurelius. He refrained from this concept and stated that they had recognized: it wasn’t sin that makes people sick, but rather that diseas may cause sins.
And today, if we think about the insights of German New Medicine by Dr. Hamer, this is becoming very up to date. We find psychoses, that can be visualized in CT scans, as a result of diverse constellations, that is, activities in the brain in different locations and sudden alterations from mania to depression and other properties.
Gerbert de Aureac again pursued this (oriental) approach and the foundation of the empire was humane. However, this was quickly changed to the contrary, when Pope Silvester died a few years later. After this, health tribunals were installed throughout the entire Holy Roman Empire of German Nations.
31:26
The Vatican didn’t manage to confiscate all the documents in all archives from this time, especially in the later protestant regions.
From these city chronicles and book we learn that there were health tribunals in the entire Holy Roman Empire, headed by a priest, accompanied by community or city councilors, and they decided who was a sacred sick person, or who was an evil sick person, who was punished by god and therefore needed to be expelled. The German word for leprosy is Aussatz, which means to cast away.
This leprosy/ expulsion- concept is identical in all regions in which the data was preserved throughout the Holy Roman Empire in the beginning of the 11th century. The definition included natural illnesses such as hair loss, acne zits, swellings and so on, but it also included trickier diagnoses such as the claim someone had a nightmare.
He might have called out in his sleep or the like, and even more wicked (this could be called the first AIDS test in medieval times): goose bumps as a reaction to a draft. That was a criterium to be expelled, the person was tattooed (marked), received the last oiling, and was forced to leave all inhabited territories, and was forbidden to come near a settlement the by threat of death penalty.
30:58
That was the leprosy concept (i.e. Aussatz, expulsion) beginning with the 11th century. Then, after the onset of the Small Ice Age in 1308, when great pressure of migration from the north arrived, as the northern apple and wheat plantations became less productive due to severe cold, large tensions, hunger catastrophes and so on, arose in the new Holy Roman Empire of German Nations.
Especially after the strong earthquake with epicenter in Friuli of 1348, which devastated many Mediterranean cIties. This was interpreted by the orthodox as a proof of the antichrist, as law and order collapsed because the central hub of global trade, Venice, as well as all trade lines and currencies, also collapsed.
At this point, this exact concept with the exact same disease definition was adapted by the priests and city officials, to declare entire groups of the population as punished by god and they were claimed to have the black plague. Entire city quarters were quarantined, put under lock down, starved to death, slaughtered and poisoned, just as Goethe describes it.
34:34
They simply renamed Leprosy into black plague. Later, as the Vatican’s power of definition was reduced by national revolutions, French Revolution, American Revolution, the same concept was renamed into small pox, but the same principle remained. Today, it is carried on in unacceptable disease definitions such as AIDS.
At any rate, the public was terrified to no ends, whenever epidemics were declared, for this meant they could be put into quarantine, they could be killed, they could be forced to take medications, just as Goethe described. Meanwhile, thousands died because there was no food, there were social upheavals.
And the survivors applauded. This medical system was always immediately repressive in times of crisis and in its history it always regarded disease as something vile, evil: the illness demon, that takes hold of someone and grows and rages like a cancer, and above all, can even be spread and transmitted to others like an evil spell, the disease demon.
This fear was extremely ingrained in society, and the medical system, from which the pharma industry as the most powerful entity on this planet, arose, will not give up this power on their own account. For this, we need to become active citizens.
For this, I will provide you with more information. The idea of a virus was realized, and from this idea the field of gene technology was derived.
36:32
To pick up with Pasteur again: Pasteur knew that bacteria could not cause diseases, period. Enough studies and experiments were conducted and published in Germany and elsewhere, among other by Max von Pettenkofer, who demonstrated what cholera was and how cholera was easily prevented.
Pasteur worked on contract to find an argument to not let the English through the Mediterranean Sea, he came up with the idea to claim there was a new pathogen, and this one would make its disease-toxins also in the living human body and this he called: poison! Latin: virus.
37:22
That was the idea. He said it is a thousand times smaller then bacteria, we use such dense filters where bacteria can’t pass through. He presses the liquid, the poison from a dead animal, through the filter, he injects the liquid into the brain of a dog that was tied onto a pole vertically. He used a third of the volume of the dogs brain, the liquid comes out the over side, the dog convulses, barks, foams from the mouth and dies. That was called rabies, that’s what Pasteur did.
38:20
Pasteur also claimed to have the antidote to his virus, to push the vaccine concept. This vaccination agenda was propagated primarily in France, for the Germans had their antibiotics and chemotherapy. Pasteur committed fraud in all his undertakings. But he was humane enough to document his deceits in diaries parallel to his primary lab books. He decreed that these records must never be publicized. His family naturally obtained great wealth.
But the last male ancestor of Pasteur didn’t obey to that decree and leaked the records to the Princeton university and in 1993 Professor Gerard Geisson published an analysis in the English language that revealed that Pasteur had committed massive fraud in all his studies. For instance, vaccinated animals, if they survived, had not been poisoned, the control group animals that died without vaccines were poisoned massively and so on. That was Pasteur.
39:30
Pasteur is the inventor of the idea of a smaller pathogen that cannot be seen in the optical microscope, but that always makes its poison, the disease- causing poison. This supported the standard model of illness which was use for centuries, a model that is based on the premise of war, not on the premise of symbiosis, as is the real workings of Nature.
In order to solidify this model and to have political leverage against England, Pasteur postulates the idea of a virus. But Pasteur didn’t anticipate that there would be a microscope in the future, an electron microscope, which has a much higher magnification as the optical microscope, that would allow to see small structures not visible before.
And with this electron microscope, available to science after WW II, it was possible to visualize structures one thousands of the size of a bacterium. They observed spores, that were still capable of staying alive. It was recognized that bacteria generate spores, when they die slowly.
If they die rapidly, when they are for example heated or dried out, then they produce even smaller particles that can’t live by themselves, but they consist of proteins and bear a nucleic acid in the center, and they will provide other bacteria, the ones that survived, with nutrients, so the latter can overcome the crisis situation.
41:22
This was observed in the cases of bacteria, in other very simple organisms, in fungi, in amoeba. In my own research, I first found it in a very simple algae from the ocean. But it was never observed in a human or animal or plant. You can verify this with little effort.
beginning of part2
42:40
As a first step, you can check the virus question by asking: How are viruses detected nowadays?
If a virologist claims he isolated an influenza virus, then he refers to the chicken egg and the chicken embryo, as we can see in the media for the planning for the current H1N1 influenza pandemic. They work with chicken eggs, they kill chicken embryos, that’s the modern form of animal tests. This method goes back to Robert Koch.
If the embryo dies, they say it was a virus and that they had isolated the virus. They took something from a diseased animal or a human, they inject it into the egg and then, depending on how the embryo dies, on what location it is becoming spotted first, they will claim it was this type of virus or that one. That is proclaimed to be isolation, when chicken embryos are killed.
42:44
Needless to say, there is no control group: if you inject a sterile solution of the same amount, the chicken embryo dies as well.
You can also verify it by taking a look at the photos that claim to depict viruses and you will find they are identical with images from completely normal cells, that is with electron micrographs from normal cells. Here, we see a section from the centre of a cell, which is very productive, the so-called Golgi apparatus, that produces various substances, and these are separated in small vesicles, they are all of different sizes, but they have no nucleic acid within them.
43:32
A larger fat particle is called a small pox virus, here we see the bacteria within the cells, the mitochondria, which process the oxygen, here we see two small ones. These particles are mitochondria, a muscle cell has 1000, a liver cell has 2000 mitochondria, and these were extracted from the cell in a thin cross section, embedded in artificial resin and cut in a very thin slice with a diamond blade.
When they are protruded with an electron beam, we see the cap of such a mitochondrion. And such particles are then sold as virus without ever having isolated them, without having shown them in an isolated condition, in order to demonstrate that these look identical to what is shown in the photo of the cell.
44:32
Here, for instance, the photo that circulated as the photo of HIV, published by Montagnier. Here, we see how particles are excreted or absorbed from the cell into or out of the cell cavity. In biology, we call this endocytosis or exocytosis. Whenever something goes into or out of the cell liquid. This has nothing to do with particles that have a stable structure, that carry nucleic acid within them, that can leave the organism, such as the viruses or bacteria, that are called phages, or with the things I discovered in the ocean, they are harmless.
These particles here are normal components of cells.
In the case of the funny photos that are presented as influenza virus: these are simply mixtures of fats and proteins. If these are shaken in an ultrasound bath and then visualized (they decompose quickly) they don’t have an nucleic acid and they are of various sizes.
That’s how you can tell fraud.
45:45
Further, they don’t even claim that they observed this within the cells or that the particles were isolated.
What is striking in the current swine flue pandemic: they are trying to present more pictures of particles that are more or less equally shaped.
You can reseach this by demanding a scientific publication, in which it is proven and documented that the virus exists, it was seen in the organism, it was isolated from the organism, purified from all foreign components.
Just as on world savings day [or when you fill out your Tax form], your Euros must be isolated, buttons and chewing-gums are not excepted.
Then the isolated particles must be analyzed biochemically. In the first step, a scientific publication can be recognized in the title of the scientific journal and of course the two dates, first the date of submission of the paper to the editor and second the date when it was checked and accepted by three work group, that were not previously know to the authors…
I have not been able to determine if or when I will have the time to translate the second part of the presentation. If it will be completed, I will link to it on this article.
Sacha Dobler
Read more:
DEUTSCH
Dr. Stefan Lanka: The history of the infection theory. (English transcript)
Original video “Grippepandemie und Tamiflu” copy here. Dokuments: klein-klein-media.de Translation from German and original subtitled video: Sacha Dobler, AbruptEarthChanges.com
1.08 [time markers of the video]
My name is Stefan Lanka, I am a biologist and virologist. I discovered the first virus, which was in the ocean. That’s how I became involved in this matter. First, I recognized that this virus doesn’t cause any harm. Secondly, the Austrian professor Fritz Pol alerted me to the fact, that something was wrong with the entire AIDS affair and the virus might not even exist at all.
I checked this and realized, that was indeed the case. I thought this couldn’t be and I remained silent for half a year, for I assumed, I misunderstand something. I couldn’t imagine that the entire world would go along with this.
2:00
Then I started researching and became involved in the infection theory. I realized that everything was wrong, it initially started with an error, that then turned into fraud, political fraud already under Otto von Bismarck, this can easily be proven and reconstructed. This fraudulent concept was abandoned after World War II, then reestablished by the Americans in order to provoke fear and to conduct population control.
Copy of the translated video
(original was deleted by Youtube):
2:45
Further, I recognized, as I will demonstrate here, how the infection theory gave rise to the gene theory and the so-called molecular technology and gene manipulation and -technology. Today’s model of the infection theory is used in the form of vaccines, of fear from material contagion, in the form of pandemics, just as in the current one, which is predicted to erupt any moment, or it will erupt in the second phase or even later and that it will then be encountered with the drug called Tamiflu. Incidentally,
Tamiflu stands for toxic amiflue, there was an apparent glitch in the naming process of this chemo-therapeutic drug.
03:32
I’m going to tell the story, how everything developed, in order for you to comprehend, how an error turned into a fraud, a fraud turned into a crime, and how through the industrialization of this crime, the madness developed, a kind of madness that endangers all of us, the entire human race.
04:03
We begin at a point in history of ancient Greece there this concept infection developed. It is the basis of today’s system of medicine that is ruled by systematic fighting and poisoning. It is also why we are supposed to swallow Tamiflu even preemptively and, after the pandemic is declared, it should be take in large quantities.
04:55
Before we delve into ancient Greece: Goethe tried to warn of the 2006 influence pandemic, and also of AIDS and of the swallowing of Tamiflu. He did this in Faust I, not in the first edition, that went through censorship, not in the second, but in the third or fourth edition he included this essential passage, in which he describes how even back then a single doctor killed thousands of people:
First he describes in alchemist’s language, how the Tamiflu and chemotherapy of his time was produced: organic mercury compounds, mixed with sirup, Latwergen stands for sirup mixtures, and these will be the hellish Latwergen in alchemistic language and how they were produced. Here are the important lines:
Here was the medicine: the patients died.
No one asked: who recovered?
(Here was the Tamiflu, the patients died (will die?)
And no one asked: who recovered?
No one asked: is the theory correct? Does the virus exist at all? )
So we roamed, with our hellish pills,
Among the valleys and the hills,
Worse than the pestilence (plague) itself we were.
And we’ll treat the black plague also, a political disease just as AIDS, influenza, SARS, BSE, just as small pox, the collective term of leprosy, from which black plague was derived, and also the collective term of polio.
I myself have poisoned thousands: that’s quite clear:
And now from the withered old must hear
How men praise shameless murderers.
Goethe. He has not been taken seriously ’till today.
Whenever there is a tsunami or an earthquake, I think to myself:
Goethe is speaking again. For he warned and this warning was dismissed.
06:49
How did it get to this, what is the mistake, the overall false assumption? The general false assumption, on which the entire western academic medicine is based on, is this: In the frameworks of the doctrine of juices, it was believed that disease was brought about by an unbalance of juices or fluids in the body.
We have many different fluids in the body, about 270 different types, in the joints, in the eye, sweat glands, digestive glands, fluids of the inner ear, brain fluids,spinal fluids and so on. It was assumed that a non-equilibrium of juices would lead to the development of disease-causing toxins.
And it was believed from experience, that the administration of small amounts of poisons would cause in the body the reaction of production of an antidote, anti-poison. This idea derived from the experience with the cell toxin alcohol.
Consumed in small quantities it can be fun, it can also diminish anxieties and the like, but if a young person who never had been in contact with alcohol, drinks half a bottle of liquor, when he is paralyzed enough to not be able to spit, then his stomach must be pumped empty, otherwise he dies of alcohol poisoning. Jelzin and others, they make world politics after two liters.
08:12
This observation was the basis premise : to ingest a poison little by little. You can try it yourself, quit drinking alcohol for half a year, and then drink two glasses of wine, you’ll almost fall over.
But not because the body made the anti-poison, but because the body is trained, it has prepared the enzymes to quickly process and neutralize and excrete the alcohol. This doctrine of juices in this form is the explicit basis of the entire western academic medicine, including the false believe in an immune system. Why?
They believed, that a disease-causing poison could develop, and if one preemptively took a poison, then the body would make an anti-poison, so one would obtain immunity. And whenever the disease-causing poison arrives, then I’m already invulnerable.
That’s why Rasputin and Napoleon (this can be measured in the hair) frequently took different kinds of toxins in small quantities in order to be immune against a poison attack. But then in the 19th century, when it was possible to detect small amounts of toxins, it was found that in no illness, toxins can be detected. In non of them, until today.
9:56
So the theory proved to be wrong. But the entire thinking was based on it, that means to give mercury compounds preemptively, as in Goethe’s times, so whenever the disease-causing toxin comes about in form of an epidemic, the person is already invulnerable. This perception of epidemics already developed in the history of ancient Greece. It was claimed that the illness demon would possess and defile a person.
From this, the Greek word miasma is derived. Defilement, one is tarnished by the illness demon and one can transmit the disease to others. The disease demon infects me, reproduces within me, and can be passed on to others and disease-causing toxins would be produced. That’s why anti-poisons are administered preemptively, just as Goethe describes it, and the survivors applauded.
“And now from the withered old must hear
How men praise shameless murderers.“
As It were, Goethe revived Paracelsus in the figure of Faust, but he is ashamed of having been celebrated by peasants before, as they call after him: “You saved our lives!“ but thousands perished. He was ashamed of this and sat down with his Atlantus Wagner on this certain rock near the village and meditates and recounts what he did, and what his father had done.
11.56
It had been observed that bacteria produce toxins. This was investigated, and they were all very certain, that bacteria could only produce toxins in the dead body.
That is because bacteria run their metabolism in an aerobic environment and produce substances in the intestines during digestion such as necessary vitamins.
But when these bacteria are deprived of oxygen, which is the case in a dead body after a couple of days, then a few of them can survive, they change their metabolism. Just as the yeast changes its metabolism under exclusion of oxygen to produce the toxic alcohol, in this way these bacteria produce their toxins, but only under complete exclusion of oxygen.
13:03
This was well known, bacteria cannot be the cause of disease. Professor Henle further solidified this knowledge, he phrased his postulates and said: If you claim that bacteria can be transmitted and then produce their poisons, then you need to identify that bacterium in every case of a disease, which you claim was caused by this bacterium.
And that was not the case. Bacteria are only insufficiently identifiable in a test-tube, it can be done only with a few of them. Of all bacteria, which we know based on their performance, only about 2 % are cultivatable and multipliable. And what is defined as a bacterium in the laboratory is not the same as the original bacterium outside. Why?
14:11
Because the idea of bacteria in the lab representing one single type, is a laboratory artifact. For, bacteria exchange information among one another continuously and they change their form and function. This was recently confirmed in a large study: bacteria, as individual as they are in terms of their biochemistry, they are very similar in terms of their nucleic acid.
They adapt. If we extract a bacterium and cultivate it in isolation, it looses its properties after some time and it can’t survive. Thus, I must produce a large quantity of them, freeze them and then I always work with those.
But this already constitutes a massive intervention into nature, and doesn’t represent the reality of bacteria exchanging their information amongst one another, and thus the definition of types that was imposed on them, was not scientifically justifiable.
That was the first problem. For instance, they didn’t manage to find the famous tuberculosis bacterium, the cultivation of which was successfully done by Robert Koch: It could only be found in about half the cases. That remains the same to the present day.
15:46
The second Henle Postulate states: this isolated pathogen must be observed, in case of a bacterium it must be multiplied, and it must be observed whether or not it can do what is assigned to it. In all these experiments they found, the bacteria couldn’t produce toxins in the living organism, only after a few days in the dead body, after an animal or human died. That was also determined, throughout the entire scientific community without exception.
16:23
Henle formulated the third Postulate, which states: Then, the pathogen that was isolated and multiplied, must be injected into an organism and the same disease must develop. And this has never happened, never ever.
17:00
But how did it happen, that suddenly Robert Koch was celebrated as the discoverer of the transmissibility of diseases? That is the question.
17:03
The question is easily answered. Robert Koch deserved reputation for having managed to make photography adaptable to visual microscopy and to make photographs of bacteria. Photography itself had been rediscovered in Europa in 1885.
This brought him much reputation deservedly. Photography was considered to be sacred, no one could imagine that a negative could be retouched, that double exposures could be used, that it could be manipulated. It was deemed as inherently scientific and objective. They simply made claims along with photography, and this acted in a very hypnotic way, much like television today, so people just accepted these claims.
18:00
He simply photographed bacteria that can be found everywhere. From this, two different concepts derived.
Of course, these bacteria don’t cause disease, but the Third Postulate (which states bacteria much cause the same disease) was violated by Koch, he introduced the scientific fraud, that plays the central role until today, in cases like AIDS, vaccination, influenza pandemic, and so on including Tamiflu.
18:41
He said, the inoculation of the test animal with this bacteria culture leads to the development of a SIMILAR illness. Not the same, but a SIMILAR illness. And this is one of the general acts of fraud of the entire infection theory: development of a SIMILAR illness.
Read for yourself, that’s homework number one, don’t just believe me, go the library, read what Robert Koch did.
Anthrax, just one example: he kills mice with corps toxins. This corps poison you can make at home: leave a potato salad standing outside in the summer for a weak, spoiled egg meal, bacteria spores are floating in the air everywhere, they settle, grow, reproduce, they consume the oxygen. They transfer into the anaerobic state, mostly in the centre of the potato salad or the egg meal or in a dead body. And then, toxins are produced.
The toxins themselves they can kill, if this is fed to a person little by little, and the foulness is covered up with strong spices or taste enhancers. In his way, a person can be chronically poisoned, or be caused to suffer severe diarrhea and cramps.
20:10
Koch produces these toxins in a meat broth, as you can replicate at home, he injects them into the vein of a mouse, the mouse dies, the milt is swollen, he extracts the milt of the mouse, and transplants it under the skin of a frog. The frog convulses and dies and this is called skin anthrax. Robert Koch, scientific fraud.
20:42
Now you can imagine which animal experiments were made to claim lung anthrax. The milt of the killed mouse was implanted into the lungs of the frog. That is what is done until the present day, that is what is done in the influenza pandemic:
Animals are being killed with incisions of the trachea, liquids are inserted continuously, the animals die, and then it is claimed, it was the virus. You can study this on our influenza virus information flyer, which is attached to this file. On this you will find the literature on how they operate concerning influenza. No control group animals, if they were to inject ordinary liquids into the animals, the exact same were to happen.
21:32
The second thing that was derived from Germany and Robert Koch, was this: Robert Koch relied on new colorants to be ably to dye bacteria.
And naturally, he received these dyes from the colorant industry. Then, all other medical researcher took the same colorants, took healthy tissue, they acidified the tissue and discovered they had the same coloring reaction and the exact same bacteria can be seen and photographed, just as Robert Koch did.
22:12
But then they also discovered, these dyes killed bacteria by making holes in them, they inhibit the DNA of the bacteria, these can no longer reproduce, the bacteria die. From this, antibiotics were derived, from colorants. BASF, BAYER, IG Farben, Hoechst, Merk and so on.
The pharma- industry was derived from colorant manufacturers based on the infection hypothesis. The American capital built up their parallel structures in Switzerland, in order to keep up with the revolutionary knowledge of the Germans, who were assumed to be capable of having something important just as the H. Bosch process, were nitrogen is extracted from air.
By this, the Germans no longer relied on importing sodium nitrate from Chile for bombs and grenades, as the oceans were blocked. That’s the historic background.
23:24
But why did the German government employ Robert Koch? He already had to flee from Berlin before because he had killed thousand with his magic drug tuberculin against tuberculosis. This drug’s ingredients were kept secret against the law. He fled,
Otto von Bismarck called him back, he desperately needed a pretext against the British who had seized the Suez canal illegally and thus had significant military and political advantages, for they didn’t have to sail around Africa, but they came through the Suez canal from India with their troops and goods, such as spices, serving as anti-oxidants, and the like and they sailed through the calm Mediterran sea.
The German tried to deprive the English form this advantage with the allegation they were bringing home anthrax, smallpox, the black pledge from India. Thus, quarantine was demanded, they weren’t allowed to dock at any Mediterranean port and at Gibraltar they were shot at.
Therefore, Robert Koch, who was on the run, was called back and was offered 100,000 Reichsmark in order to create the argument that the English would bring in black plague, small pox and anthrax, the latter we already discussed. We noted, that this colorant business lead to the emergence of antibiotics, later to the chemotherapy and the weaponized gasses, including the pharma- industry with its entire capital, with more revenue then all military budgets globally combined.
25:18
Robert Koch committed scientific fraud by not upholding the first postulate. He could cultivate some bacteria, which he didn’t find in every case of a disease. This is still done in the same way today. He could never reproduce the disease as in the third postulate, and neither could he again isolate the same pathogen from these organisms. That is the date when the brutal animal experiments were introduced.
26:02
How did the idea of a virus come to life? Koch’s French counterpart was Luis Pasteur, scientific fraudster employed by the French, as the French were at war with Germany in 1872.
The dead were later declared as victims of a small pox epidemic. The Germans claimed it came from France, the French said it came from Germany.
Pasteur, knew from Bechamp and other scientist, what bacteria could do and what they couldn’t do, he first denied the new knowledge in order to play along with the church, he claimed he had proven the primordial creation, only to later take a reverse stand, once he was employed by the state, he said it was all wrong, bacteria are in a continuum, there are spores, they cannot be created in the primordial soup.
Pasteur sold these insights as his own, but he knew what bacteria can and what they cannot do, and has earned some merits for this.
27:16
But the same Pasteur, who knew, that bacteria cannot cause diseases, applied a trick. In order to maintain the model of the doctrine of juices and disease, which the entire western medicine is based on, a disease-causing toxin had to be postulated.
Especially since this concept of pandemics had been used many times to suppress upheavals, to control starvation situations and so on.
It all started, with the early Vatican creating fear of diseases, by claiming the disease is coming from the disease demon, just as in ancient Greece. Thus, in order to establish total control, the early Vatican claimed that illness was a punishment by God.
28:26
This concept was interrupted for a few years by the Stauffers, when emperor Otto, at the re-foundation of the Holy Roman Empire on Jan 1st, 1000 AD employed the French Humanist Gerbert de Aureac for the purpose of establishing a medical system, which was obviously not present before.
For, the military faction, the western Roman wing, had separated from Rome, that is well known. They had only military knowledge, but no technical knowledge, they were separated from the universities and culture. The early gothic was able to build small windows only, no tall buildings, the building plans were useless, whenever the knowledge of craftsmen and engineers, which always must go together, didn’t converge. This is visible in early gothic architecture.
29:33
So, they recruited Gerbert de Aureac, alias Pope Silvester. He brought in the Arabs in each garrison from which the monasteries were derived from, with the aim to obtain the ancient knowledge of the Chinese via the Arabs, who themselves had further developed medicine.
For, in China the concept of contagion didn’t exist, there is the concept of too much and too little energy, there is the influence, latin influenza, by the decrease and increase of light and warmth in spring and autumn, but the idea of contagion plays no role.
Contagion is not part of arjuvedic medicine. The concept of contagion is typically war- oriented, European.
30:12
The idea of disease being something vile was already retracted from by Galenus, the great physician of Marcus Aurelius. He refrained from this concept and stated that they had recognized: it wasn’t sin that makes people sick, but rather that diseas may cause sins.
And today, if we think about the insights of German New Medicine by Dr. Hamer, this is becoming very up to date. We find psychoses, that can be visualized in CT scans, as a result of diverse constellations, that is, activities in the brain in different locations and sudden alterations from mania to depression and other properties.
Gerbert de Aureac again pursued this (oriental) approach and the foundation of the empire was humane. However, this was quickly changed to the contrary, when Pope Silvester died a few years later. After this, health tribunals were installed throughout the entire Holy Roman Empire of German Nations.
31:26
The Vatican didn’t manage to confiscate all the documents in all archives from this time, especially in the later protestant regions.
From these city chronicles and book we learn that there were health tribunals in the entire Holy Roman Empire, headed by a priest, accompanied by community or city councilors, and they decided who was a sacred sick person, or who was an evil sick person, who was punished by god and therefore needed to be expelled. The German word for leprosy is Aussatz, which means to cast away.
This leprosy/ expulsion- concept is identical in all regions in which the data was preserved throughout the Holy Roman Empire in the beginning of the 11th century. The definition included natural illnesses such as hair loss, acne zits, swellings and so on, but it also included trickier diagnoses such as the claim someone had a nightmare.
He might have called out in his sleep or the like, and even more wicked (this could be called the first AIDS test in medieval times): goose bumps as a reaction to a draft. That was a criterium to be expelled, the person was tattooed (marked), received the last oiling, and was forced to leave all inhabited territories, and was forbidden to come near a settlement the by threat of death penalty.
30:58
That was the leprosy concept (i.e. Aussatz, expulsion) beginning with the 11th century. Then, after the onset of the Small Ice Age in 1308, when great pressure of migration from the north arrived, as the northern apple and wheat plantations became less productive due to severe cold, large tensions, hunger catastrophes and so on, arose in the new Holy Roman Empire of German Nations.
Especially after the strong earthquake with epicenter in Friuli of 1348, which devastated many Mediterranean cIties. This was interpreted by the orthodox as a proof of the antichrist, as law and order collapsed because the central hub of global trade, Venice, as well as all trade lines and currencies, also collapsed.
At this point, this exact concept with the exact same disease definition was adapted by the priests and city officials, to declare entire groups of the population as punished by god and they were claimed to have the black plague. Entire city quarters were quarantined, put under lock down, starved to death, slaughtered and poisoned, just as Goethe describes it.
34:34
They simply renamed Leprosy into black plague. Later, as the Vatican’s power of definition was reduced by national revolutions, French Revolution, American Revolution, the same concept was renamed into small pox, but the same principle remained. Today, it is carried on in unacceptable disease definitions such as AIDS.
At any rate, the public was terrified to no ends, whenever epidemics were declared, for this meant they could be put into quarantine, they could be killed, they could be forced to take medications, just as Goethe described. Meanwhile, thousands died because there was no food, there were social upheavals.
And the survivors applauded. This medical system was always immediately repressive in times of crisis and in its history it always regarded disease as something vile, evil: the illness demon, that takes hold of someone and grows and rages like a cancer, and above all, can even be spread and transmitted to others like an evil spell, the disease demon.
This fear was extremely ingrained in society, and the medical system, from which the pharma industry as the most powerful entity on this planet, arose, will not give up this power on their own account. For this, we need to become active citizens.
For this, I will provide you with more information. The idea of a virus was realized, and from this idea the field of gene technology was derived.
36:32
To pick up with Pasteur again: Pasteur knew that bacteria could not cause diseases, period. Enough studies and experiments were conducted and published in Germany and elsewhere, among other by Max von Pettenkofer, who demonstrated what cholera was and how cholera was easily prevented.
Pasteur worked on contract to find an argument to not let the English through the Mediterranean Sea, he came up with the idea to claim there was a new pathogen, and this one would make its disease-toxins also in the living human body and this he called: poison! Latin: virus.
37:22
That was the idea. He said it is a thousand times smaller then bacteria, we use such dense filters where bacteria can’t pass through. He presses the liquid, the poison from a dead animal, through the filter, he injects the liquid into the brain of a dog that was tied onto a pole vertically. He used a third of the volume of the dogs brain, the liquid comes out the over side, the dog convulses, barks, foams from the mouth and dies. That was called rabies, that’s what Pasteur did.
38:20
Pasteur also claimed to have the antidote to his virus, to push the vaccine concept. This vaccination agenda was propagated primarily in France, for the Germans had their antibiotics and chemotherapy. Pasteur committed fraud in all his undertakings. But he was humane enough to document his deceits in diaries parallel to his primary lab books. He decreed that these records must never be publicized. His family naturally obtained great wealth.
But the last male ancestor of Pasteur didn’t obey to that decree and leaked the records to the Princeton university and in 1993 Professor Gerard Geisson published an analysis in the English language that revealed that Pasteur had committed massive fraud in all his studies. For instance, vaccinated animals, if they survived, had not been poisoned, the control group animals that died without vaccines were poisoned massively and so on. That was Pasteur.
39:30
Pasteur is the inventor of the idea of a smaller pathogen that cannot be seen in the optical microscope, but that always makes its poison, the disease- causing poison. This supported the standard model of illness which was use for centuries, a model that is based on the premise of war, not on the premise of symbiosis, as is the real workings of Nature.
In order to solidify this model and to have political leverage against England, Pasteur postulates the idea of a virus. But Pasteur didn’t anticipate that there would be a microscope in the future, an electron microscope, which has a much higher magnification as the optical microscope, that would allow to see small structures not visible before.
And with this electron microscope, available to science after WW II, it was possible to visualize structures one thousands of the size of a bacterium. They observed spores, that were still capable of staying alive. It was recognized that bacteria generate spores, when they die slowly.
If they die rapidly, when they are for example heated or dried out, then they produce even smaller particles that can’t live by themselves, but they consist of proteins and bear a nucleic acid in the center, and they will provide other bacteria, the ones that survived, with nutrients, so the latter can overcome the crisis situation.
41:22
This was observed in the cases of bacteria, in other very simple organisms, in fungi, in amoeba. In my own research, I first found it in a very simple algae from the ocean. But it was never observed in a human or animal or plant. You can verify this with little effort.
beginning of part2
42:40
As a first step, you can check the virus question by asking: How are viruses detected nowadays?
If a virologist claims he isolated an influenza virus, then he refers to the chicken egg and the chicken embryo, as we can see in the media for the planning for the current H1N1 influenza pandemic. They work with chicken eggs, they kill chicken embryos, that’s the modern form of animal tests. This method goes back to Robert Koch.
If the embryo dies, they say it was a virus and that they had isolated the virus. They took something from a diseased animal or a human, they inject it into the egg and then, depending on how the embryo dies, on what location it is becoming spotted first, they will claim it was this type of virus or that one. That is proclaimed to be isolation, when chicken embryos are killed.
42:44
Needless to say, there is no control group: if you inject a sterile solution of the same amount, the chicken embryo dies as well.
You can also verify it by taking a look at the photos that claim to depict viruses and you will find they are identical with images from completely normal cells, that is with electron micrographs from normal cells. Here, we see a section from the centre of a cell, which is very productive, the so-called Golgi apparatus, that produces various substances, and these are separated in small vesicles, they are all of different sizes, but they have no nucleic acid within them.
43:32
A larger fat particle is called a small pox virus, here we see the bacteria within the cells, the mitochondria, which process the oxygen, here we see two small ones. These particles are mitochondria, a muscle cell has 1000, a liver cell has 2000 mitochondria, and these were extracted from the cell in a thin cross section, embedded in artificial resin and cut in a very thin slice with a diamond blade.
When they are protruded with an electron beam, we see the cap of such a mitochondrion. And such particles are then sold as virus without ever having isolated them, without having shown them in an isolated condition, in order to demonstrate that these look identical to what is shown in the photo of the cell.
44:32
Here, for instance, the photo that circulated as the photo of HIV, published by Montagnier. Here, we see how particles are excreted or absorbed from the cell into or out of the cell cavity. In biology, we call this endocytosis or exocytosis. Whenever something goes into or out of the cell liquid. This has nothing to do with particles that have a stable structure, that carry nucleic acid within them, that can leave the organism, such as the viruses or bacteria, that are called phages, or with the things I discovered in the ocean, they are harmless.
These particles here are normal components of cells.
In the case of the funny photos that are presented as influenza virus: these are simply mixtures of fats and proteins. If these are shaken in an ultrasound bath and then visualized (they decompose quickly) they don’t have an nucleic acid and they are of various sizes.
That’s how you can tell fraud.
45:45
Further, they don’t even claim that they observed this within the cells or that the particles were isolated.
What is striking in the current swine flue pandemic: they are trying to present more pictures of particles that are more or less equally shaped.
You can reseach this by demanding a scientific publication, in which it is proven and documented that the virus exists, it was seen in the organism, it was isolated from the organism, purified from all foreign components.
Just as on world savings day [or when you fill out your Tax form], your Euros must be isolated, buttons and chewing-gums are not excepted.
Then the isolated particles must be analyzed biochemically. In the first step, a scientific publication can be recognized in the title of the scientific journal and of course the two dates, first the date of submission of the paper to the editor and second the date when it was checked and accepted by three work group, that were not previously know to the authors…
I have not been able to determine if or when I will have the time to translate the second part of the presentation. If it will be completed, I will link to it on this article.
Sacha Dobler
Read more:
DEUTSCH
Dr. Stefan Lanka: The history of the infection theory. (English transcript)
🌸
🌸
Dr Stefan Lanka:
Pandemic Theater
History of the Infection Theory
🌸
Impfen nein danke
Biologist and Virologist Dr Stefan Lanka:
Pandemic Theater - History of the Infection Theory (Part 1).
German, with English subtitles, transcript here:
https://abruptearthchanges.com/2017/1...
https://abruptearthchanges.com/2017/11/17/dr-stefan-lanka-the-history-of-the-infection-theory/
🌸
Unfortunately, no further parts with subtitles available.
Original German video Pandemie Theater in full length w/o subtitles:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5umdG...
After the pandemic is before the pandemic.
Problem-reaction-solution. Virus names change, the ploy remains always the same.
Beware of the medical tyranny. We demand informed consent,
free medical choice for consumers, patients and doctors.
See also: Pandemic and virus lies: No more fake news - Jon Rappoport since 1988:
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/
Dr Amandha Dawn Vollmer: Coronavirus Tomfoolery - How the Virus Lie is Created
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNq8w ...
Dr Amandha Dawn Vollmer: Coronavirus is not a Virus
https://www.facebook.com/groups/23446 ...
Torsten Engelbrecht & Dr Claus Koehnlein: Virus Mania.
How the Medical Industry Continually Invents Epidemics,
Making Billion-Dollar Profits At Our Expense (2007): http://www.whale.to/c/Virus-Mania55tt...
https://abruptearthchanges.com/2020/03/22/corona-crisis-prof-sucharit-bhakdi
🌸
Dr Stefan Lanka:
Pandemic Theater
History of the Infection Theory
🌸
Impfen nein danke
Biologist and Virologist Dr Stefan Lanka:
Pandemic Theater - History of the Infection Theory (Part 1).
German, with English subtitles, transcript here:
https://abruptearthchanges.com/2017/1...
https://abruptearthchanges.com/2017/11/17/dr-stefan-lanka-the-history-of-the-infection-theory/
🌸
Unfortunately, no further parts with subtitles available.
Original German video Pandemie Theater in full length w/o subtitles:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5umdG...
After the pandemic is before the pandemic.
Problem-reaction-solution. Virus names change, the ploy remains always the same.
Beware of the medical tyranny. We demand informed consent,
free medical choice for consumers, patients and doctors.
See also: Pandemic and virus lies: No more fake news - Jon Rappoport since 1988:
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/
Dr Amandha Dawn Vollmer: Coronavirus Tomfoolery - How the Virus Lie is Created
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNq8w ...
Dr Amandha Dawn Vollmer: Coronavirus is not a Virus
https://www.facebook.com/groups/23446 ...
Torsten Engelbrecht & Dr Claus Koehnlein: Virus Mania.
How the Medical Industry Continually Invents Epidemics,
Making Billion-Dollar Profits At Our Expense (2007): http://www.whale.to/c/Virus-Mania55tt...
https://abruptearthchanges.com/2020/03/22/corona-crisis-prof-sucharit-bhakdi
🌸
🌸
The Assistant Director (Dr Joanne O’Gorman) kindly provided me with two scientific papers which allegedly demonstrate the isolation of the novel corona virus and the Influenza A virus.
1) Isolation of a novel corona virus from a man with
pneumonia in Saudi Arabia
Ali Moh Zaki Md PhD et al New England Journal of Medicine November 8 2012
The last paragraph on Page 1818 is revealing:
To further characterize the virus, approximately 90% of the virus genome sequence was obtained on sequence analysis with the use of the 454 platform.
The authors have explicitly admitted that they obtained what they believe is 90% of the genome sequence of this alleged virus. I think we can unanimously agree that 90% is not 100% and they explicitly do not claim to have isolated the novel corona virus. They have merely recreated 90% of what they believe is the genome sequence of the alleged novel corona virus.
2) Influenza A virus isolation,
culture and identification
Amie J Eisfeld et al, Nature Protocols Vol 9 No 11 2014
I found this paper interesting because it clearly explains the techniques used to allegedly “isolate” pathogenic viruses.
The authors believe that avian IAVs possess HA proteins. They use hemagglutination assays to detect the IAVs. The second last paragraph on Page 2665 explains how they detect the alleged IAVs
Hemagglutination assay
A widely used, inexpensive , rapid and standard screeningmethod for the detection of IAVs is the hemagglutination assay (originally developed by Hirst and Francis et al), which is based on the ability of the viral HA protein to bind to and ‘agglutinate’ red blood cells (RBCs).
Despite the fact that the title of the paper suggests that the authors have isolated the Influenza A virus – they clearly have not and do not claim to have done so in this paper. They have used an indirect method (hemmaglutination assay) to detect the presence of the HA protein based on their belief that the Influenza A virus contains this protein.
These two papers do not demonstrate how the respective virus was isolated with the total virus genome intact. The PCR technique is used to figure out which ‘pathogenic virus’ the genetic fragments came from, but this indirect method cannot be relied upon to prove the existence of any alleged pathogenic virus. The only way to prove the existence of a pathogenic virus is to isolate it.
The Stefan Lanka measles case
In November 2011, Dr Stefan Lanka offered €100,000 to anyone who could prove the existence of the measles virus, along with a direct measurement of its diameter.
Dr David Bardens presented 6 scientific papers, which he claimed proved the existence of the measles virus. Dr Lanka refused to pay up because the papers did not prove the existence of the measles virus. Dr Bardens began legal proceedings in late 2013 to get the €100,000 in prize money. The Ravensburg district court ruled in favour of Dr David Bardens in March 2015. Dr Lanka appealed this court decision.
The OLG court in Stuttgart on 16 February 2016 overturned the judgment of the Ravensburg court and dismissed the action. The plaintiff (Dr David Bardens) filed an appeal against the judgment of the OLG to the Supreme Court (BGH). The basis of his appeal was his subjective and false perception of the trial at the OLG in Stuttgart,and his assertion that what Dr Lanka factually stated about the ‘measles virus’ posed a threat to public health. The plaintiff’s position was rejected by theSupreme Court (BGH);
Thus it confirmed the judgment of the OLG Stuttgart from 16 February 2016. The sum of €100,000 which Dr Stefan Lanka had offered as a reward for scientific proof of the existence of the alleged measles virus does not have to be paid to the plaintiff – Dr David Bardens - who was also ordered to bear all procedural costs.
Five experts were involved in the case. All five experts, including Prof. Dr. Dr. Andreas Podbielski who had been appointed by the OLG Stuttgart have stated that none of the six publications contains scientific proof of the existence of the alleged measles virus.
Arguments against the belief
in the existence of the measles virus
Dr Stefan Lanka has four compelling arguments against the current belief in the existence of the measles virus (and by extension all other alleged pathogenic viruses). These arguments were made as part of his measles virus legal case.
1) Dr Lanka hired two independent laboratories to investigate the alleged measles virus. They both confirmed that the typical gene sequence of quite normal healthy cells has been wrongly interpreted as central component parts of the ‘measles virus’.
Short genetic sequences (from normal healthy cells) have been arbitrarily assembled together in order to make up a model of the “measles virus”, and this is stated to be the genetic model (genome sequence) of the measles virus.
I would like to point out that is what was done in the two papers on the novel corona virus and the influenza A virus,which were submitted to me by the Assistant Director of the NVRL Dr JoanneO’Gorman.
2) Professor Dr Andreas Podbielski testified at the measles virus trial along with four other technical experts. These five technical experts all confirmed that the entire area of measles virology is extremely unscientific because no control experiments are carried out.
3) The five technical experts also agreed that the current definition of a pathogenic virus is in flux and is being questioned by the scientific community. It is clearly logical that if the definition of a virus is agreed to be in flux, there cannot be any clear unambiguous statements about pathogenic viruses and they ought not to presented as a fact or as existing but rather as a hypothesis or belief that is currently held by most biologists worldwide including the NVRL.
4) The current belief in the existence of the measles virus can be traced back to the influential paper published by Enders &Peeble in 1954. However, this paper does not prove the existence of the measles virus. Enders & Peeble observed the death of cells in the test tube and believed that this was caused by the phantom measles virus.
However as per argument 2 they did not carry out any control experiments. If they had carried them out they would have determined that their preparation of the test-tube caused the death of the cells and that the observed death of cells had nothing to do with any alleged measles virus.
In 1954, John Enders 1954 won the Nobel Prize in Medicine along with two other colleagues for their in vitro culture of the alleged polio virus. He applied the same technique he used inconnection with the ‘polio virus’ to the ‘measles virus’ in 1954, which resulted in the infamous Enders / Peeble paper.
FOI Request / Experiment to prove the existence of the measles virus
Dr Lanka states that the scientifically valid method for the isolation of any alleged virus is the density gradient centrifugation technique. This technique is apparently referenced in all current textbooks but for some reason is never used by the laboratories such as the NVRL.
I would like the NVRL to carry out a simple experiment:
1) Attempt to isolate the measles virus using the density gradient centrifugation technique.
2) As a control experiment isolate any so-called giant virus such as the Marine Brown Alga ectocarpus siliculosus virus using the density gradient centrifugation technique.
I am certain that it will be impossible to isolate the measles virus or any other alleged pathogenic virus (such as HIV, HPV, H5N1, mumps, rubella, IAVs, novel corona virus etc) because they do not exist.However, it is possible to isolate the so-called giant viruses with a diameter of 120-150nm; I believe almost 3000 of these giant viruses have to date been isolated by the density gradient centrifugation technique.
A scientist must question all his assumptions and beliefs otherwise the status quo would never change; this is the scientific method.; this is real science. I request that the NVRL carry out this simple experiment (and create a new record / scientific paper).
I understand from Dr Stefan Lanka that any first year university biology student would be able to carry out this proposed experiment, which is simple, cheap and fast to execute. I would like the NVRL to explain the outcome of this experiment.
I believe that the only logical conclusion from this experiment will be the determination that all alleged pathogenic viruses such as for example the mumps, measles and rubella do not exist.
Prove my hypothesis wrong! Create the record, perform the experiment and attempt to isolate the measles virus using the density gradient centrifugation technique.
I remain yours sincerely,
James McCumiskey
1) Isolation of a novel corona virus from a man with
pneumonia in Saudi Arabia
Ali Moh Zaki Md PhD et al New England Journal of Medicine November 8 2012
The last paragraph on Page 1818 is revealing:
To further characterize the virus, approximately 90% of the virus genome sequence was obtained on sequence analysis with the use of the 454 platform.
The authors have explicitly admitted that they obtained what they believe is 90% of the genome sequence of this alleged virus. I think we can unanimously agree that 90% is not 100% and they explicitly do not claim to have isolated the novel corona virus. They have merely recreated 90% of what they believe is the genome sequence of the alleged novel corona virus.
2) Influenza A virus isolation,
culture and identification
Amie J Eisfeld et al, Nature Protocols Vol 9 No 11 2014
I found this paper interesting because it clearly explains the techniques used to allegedly “isolate” pathogenic viruses.
The authors believe that avian IAVs possess HA proteins. They use hemagglutination assays to detect the IAVs. The second last paragraph on Page 2665 explains how they detect the alleged IAVs
Hemagglutination assay
A widely used, inexpensive , rapid and standard screeningmethod for the detection of IAVs is the hemagglutination assay (originally developed by Hirst and Francis et al), which is based on the ability of the viral HA protein to bind to and ‘agglutinate’ red blood cells (RBCs).
Despite the fact that the title of the paper suggests that the authors have isolated the Influenza A virus – they clearly have not and do not claim to have done so in this paper. They have used an indirect method (hemmaglutination assay) to detect the presence of the HA protein based on their belief that the Influenza A virus contains this protein.
These two papers do not demonstrate how the respective virus was isolated with the total virus genome intact. The PCR technique is used to figure out which ‘pathogenic virus’ the genetic fragments came from, but this indirect method cannot be relied upon to prove the existence of any alleged pathogenic virus. The only way to prove the existence of a pathogenic virus is to isolate it.
The Stefan Lanka measles case
In November 2011, Dr Stefan Lanka offered €100,000 to anyone who could prove the existence of the measles virus, along with a direct measurement of its diameter.
Dr David Bardens presented 6 scientific papers, which he claimed proved the existence of the measles virus. Dr Lanka refused to pay up because the papers did not prove the existence of the measles virus. Dr Bardens began legal proceedings in late 2013 to get the €100,000 in prize money. The Ravensburg district court ruled in favour of Dr David Bardens in March 2015. Dr Lanka appealed this court decision.
The OLG court in Stuttgart on 16 February 2016 overturned the judgment of the Ravensburg court and dismissed the action. The plaintiff (Dr David Bardens) filed an appeal against the judgment of the OLG to the Supreme Court (BGH). The basis of his appeal was his subjective and false perception of the trial at the OLG in Stuttgart,and his assertion that what Dr Lanka factually stated about the ‘measles virus’ posed a threat to public health. The plaintiff’s position was rejected by theSupreme Court (BGH);
Thus it confirmed the judgment of the OLG Stuttgart from 16 February 2016. The sum of €100,000 which Dr Stefan Lanka had offered as a reward for scientific proof of the existence of the alleged measles virus does not have to be paid to the plaintiff – Dr David Bardens - who was also ordered to bear all procedural costs.
Five experts were involved in the case. All five experts, including Prof. Dr. Dr. Andreas Podbielski who had been appointed by the OLG Stuttgart have stated that none of the six publications contains scientific proof of the existence of the alleged measles virus.
Arguments against the belief
in the existence of the measles virus
Dr Stefan Lanka has four compelling arguments against the current belief in the existence of the measles virus (and by extension all other alleged pathogenic viruses). These arguments were made as part of his measles virus legal case.
1) Dr Lanka hired two independent laboratories to investigate the alleged measles virus. They both confirmed that the typical gene sequence of quite normal healthy cells has been wrongly interpreted as central component parts of the ‘measles virus’.
Short genetic sequences (from normal healthy cells) have been arbitrarily assembled together in order to make up a model of the “measles virus”, and this is stated to be the genetic model (genome sequence) of the measles virus.
I would like to point out that is what was done in the two papers on the novel corona virus and the influenza A virus,which were submitted to me by the Assistant Director of the NVRL Dr JoanneO’Gorman.
2) Professor Dr Andreas Podbielski testified at the measles virus trial along with four other technical experts. These five technical experts all confirmed that the entire area of measles virology is extremely unscientific because no control experiments are carried out.
3) The five technical experts also agreed that the current definition of a pathogenic virus is in flux and is being questioned by the scientific community. It is clearly logical that if the definition of a virus is agreed to be in flux, there cannot be any clear unambiguous statements about pathogenic viruses and they ought not to presented as a fact or as existing but rather as a hypothesis or belief that is currently held by most biologists worldwide including the NVRL.
4) The current belief in the existence of the measles virus can be traced back to the influential paper published by Enders &Peeble in 1954. However, this paper does not prove the existence of the measles virus. Enders & Peeble observed the death of cells in the test tube and believed that this was caused by the phantom measles virus.
However as per argument 2 they did not carry out any control experiments. If they had carried them out they would have determined that their preparation of the test-tube caused the death of the cells and that the observed death of cells had nothing to do with any alleged measles virus.
In 1954, John Enders 1954 won the Nobel Prize in Medicine along with two other colleagues for their in vitro culture of the alleged polio virus. He applied the same technique he used inconnection with the ‘polio virus’ to the ‘measles virus’ in 1954, which resulted in the infamous Enders / Peeble paper.
FOI Request / Experiment to prove the existence of the measles virus
Dr Lanka states that the scientifically valid method for the isolation of any alleged virus is the density gradient centrifugation technique. This technique is apparently referenced in all current textbooks but for some reason is never used by the laboratories such as the NVRL.
I would like the NVRL to carry out a simple experiment:
1) Attempt to isolate the measles virus using the density gradient centrifugation technique.
2) As a control experiment isolate any so-called giant virus such as the Marine Brown Alga ectocarpus siliculosus virus using the density gradient centrifugation technique.
I am certain that it will be impossible to isolate the measles virus or any other alleged pathogenic virus (such as HIV, HPV, H5N1, mumps, rubella, IAVs, novel corona virus etc) because they do not exist.However, it is possible to isolate the so-called giant viruses with a diameter of 120-150nm; I believe almost 3000 of these giant viruses have to date been isolated by the density gradient centrifugation technique.
A scientist must question all his assumptions and beliefs otherwise the status quo would never change; this is the scientific method.; this is real science. I request that the NVRL carry out this simple experiment (and create a new record / scientific paper).
I understand from Dr Stefan Lanka that any first year university biology student would be able to carry out this proposed experiment, which is simple, cheap and fast to execute. I would like the NVRL to explain the outcome of this experiment.
I believe that the only logical conclusion from this experiment will be the determination that all alleged pathogenic viruses such as for example the mumps, measles and rubella do not exist.
Prove my hypothesis wrong! Create the record, perform the experiment and attempt to isolate the measles virus using the density gradient centrifugation technique.
I remain yours sincerely,
James McCumiskey
🌸
...Virus Misconception: 2020 Article by Dr. Stefan Lanka ...https://thefreedomarticles.com/dr-stefan-lanka-2020-article-reveals-virus-misconception/
More Images for the missconception calles VIRUS dr. Stephan LankaDr. Stefan Lanka 2020 Article Busts the Virus Misconceptionhttps://truthcomestolight.com/2020/07/23/dr-stefan-lanka-2020-article-busts-the-virus-misconception/
Dr. Stefan Lanka's 2020 Article Busts the Virus Misconceptionhttps://thegnmsolution.com/dr-stefan-lankas-2020-article-busts-the-virus-misconception-2/
The virus misconception is at the heart of Operation Coronavirus, because without the concept of germ theory and without the horror story of the killer virus, Dr. Stefan Lanka's 2020 Article Busts the Virus Misconception - The GNM Solution
FREE PDF.
Misinterpretation of Virus - L.O.V.E.
Productionshttps://www.loveproductions.org/english/articles/misinterpretation-of-virus/
The Misconception called Virus (part 1), by Dr. Stefan Lanka. Paper-Virus-Lanka-002.pdf. Adobe Acrobat Dokument 1.6 MB. Download. Misinterpretation of Virus II - beginning and end of the corona crisis, by Dr. Stefan Lanka. Misinterpretation virus part 2.pdf. Adobe Acrobat Dokument 4.1 MB. Download This article is also available in Spanish language.
Dr. Stefan Lanka: The history of the infection theory ...https://davidicke.com/2020/07/09/dr-stefan-lanka-the-history-of-the-infection-theory-english-transcript/
Original video "Grippepandemie und Tamiflu" copy here. Dokuments: klein-klein-media.de Translation from German and original subtitled video: Sacha Dobler, AbruptEarthChanges.com 1.08 [time markers of the video] My name is Stefan Lanka, I am a biologist and virologist. I discovered the first virus, which was in the ocean. That's how I became involved in this matter.
Dr.Stefan Lanka | How Accurate Is The Coronavirus Test ...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CivT_e9EELQ
Is the coronavirus test valid? Does it work? Does it show the amount of the so called viruses in your body? Let's find out! Dr. Stefan Lanka explains the whole situation in a simple and scientific ...
Dr. Stefan Lanka: The history of the infection theory
...https://abruptearthchanges.com/2017/11/17/dr-stefan-lanka-the-history-of-the-infection-theory/
Original video "Grippepandemie und Tamiflu" copy here. Dokuments: klein-klein-media.de Translation from German and original subtitled video: Sacha Dobler, AbruptEarthChanges.com 1.08 [time markers of the video] My name is Stefan Lanka, I am a biologist and virologist. I discovered the first virus, which was in the ocean. That's how I became involved in this matter.
Biologist Proves Measles Isn't A Virus, Wins Supreme Court
...https://www.preventdisease.com/news/17/012717_Biologist-Proves-Measles-Isnt-Virus-Wins-Supreme-Court-Case.shtml
German biologist Dr. Stefan Lanka initially offered 100,000 euros to anyone who could provide scientific evidence that the measles virus existed. He had initially been ordered to pay up in court after Doctor David Bardens attempted to claim the prize after providing the biologist with a study that had been published in a medical journal.PDF
DismanTling The virus Theory -
WissenschafftPlushttps://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/Dismantling-the-Virus-Theory.pdf
Author: Dr. Stefan Lanka Scientists must question everything and especially what they love the most, i.e. their own discoveries and ideas. This basic rule of scientific research helps avoid erroneous developments and reveals the ones that already exist. Also, we must all be allowed to question the status quo, otherwise we would live in a ...
2Dr Stefan Lanka Debunks Pictures of "Isolated Viruses
...https://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/dr-stefan-lanka-debunks-pictures-of-isolated-viruses/
Dr. Stefan Lanka, virologist and molecular biologist, is internationally mostly known as an "AIDS dissident" (and maybe "gentechnology dissident") who has been questioning the very existence of "HIV" since 1994. In the past years, however, he stumbled over a breathtaking fact: Not even ONE of the (medically relevant) viruses has ever been isolated; there is […]
Virologist Dr Stefan Lanka Who Won A Court Case Over The
...https://darrellhines.net/2020/07/04/virologist-dr-stefan-lanka-who-won-a-court-case-over-the-non-existence-of-the-measles-virus-files-charge-against-german-government-virologist-for-corona-for-crimes/
Virologist Dr Stefan Lanka Who Won A Court Case Over The Non-Existence Of The 'Measles Virus' Files Charge Against German 'Government Virologist For Corona' For Crimes Against Humanity THERE IS NO PROVEN SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE THAT ANY VIRUS CAUSES ANY DISEASE!
Dr Stefan Lanka - Whalewhale.to/a/lanka_h.html
Dr Stefan Lanka [back] AIDS critics Viral fear racket. See: Dr. Karl Krafeld Jim West [2017 Jan] Anti-Vaxxer Biologist Stefan Lanka Bets Over $100K Measles Isn't A Virus; He Wins In German Federal Supreme Court By prophylactic vaccination of adults and especially children against measles, the pharmaceutical industry has earned Billions over a 40-year period.
Petition · 'Pathogenic' viruses do not exist · Change.orghttps://www.change.org/p/pathogenic-viruses-do-not-exist
The virus Dr Stefan Lanka discovered is called the Ectocarpus siliculosus virus. This virus is not pathogenic and enables the sea algae to thrive because of it, and not despite it. The diameter of this virus is approximately 120nm (nm - nano-meter - one billionth of a meter).
Dr. Stefan Lanka Exposes The "Viral Fraud"whale.to/a/lanka5.html
[The German original of the following text by Stefan Lanka you can find here (temporarily not available for technical reasons, Jan 11, 2003)] All these photos have in common that they, resp. the authors, can´t claim that they present a virus, as long as they do not also provide the original publications which describe how and what from the virus has been isolated.
Anti-Vaxxer Biologist Stefan Lanka Bets Over $100K Measles ...https://anonhq.com/anti-vaxxer-biologist-stefan-lanka-bets-100k-measles-isnt-virus-wins-german-federal-supreme-court/
by Dr. Stefan Lanka. The Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has ruled in the measles virus trial. The First Civil Senate of the BGH has confirmed the judgment by the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart (OLG) of the 16 February 2016.
The virus misconception is at the heart... - German New ...https://www.facebook.com/GermanNewMedicine/posts/3739588672723678
Dr. Stefan Lanka's 2020 Article Busts the Virus Misconception - The GNM Solution of Operation Coronavirus, because without the concept of germ theory and without the horror story of the killer virus, most people would not buy the
HIV/AIDS denialism - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan_Lanka
HIV/AIDS denialism is the belief, contradicted by conclusive evidence, that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) does not cause acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Some of its proponents reject the existence of HIV, while others accept that HIV exists but argue that it is a harmless passenger virus and not the cause of AIDS. Insofar as they acknowledge AIDS as a real disease, they ...
HIV & AIDS - Interview Stefan Lankahttps://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/mcinterviewsl.htm
INTERVIEW STEFAN LANKA Challenging BOTH Mainstream and Alternative AIDS Views. By Mark Gabrish Conlan. Zenger's Dec. 1998. While most people in the U.S. and Western Europe go right on believing that the so-called Human Immunodeficiency Virus [HIV] is the sole cause of AIDS, debate rages even within the alternative AIDS community over whether HIV exists at all.
How are viruses discovered and identified in the first
...https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/02/18/how-are-viruses-discovered-and-identified-in-the-first-place/
So, with the virus cover story, Wellcome was never held accountable for the damage "poppers" did to the immune systems of these gay men, and they were able to make billions off of AZT. Also, Dr. Banks also talked about problems with testing, and how a person could test positive for HIV in Africa, then go to Australia and test negative.
Prove the existence of Coronavirus! | Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/notes/tracey-northern/prove-the-existance-of-coronavirus/10157170035063865/
Dr Lanka refused to pay up because the papers did not prove the existence of the measles virus. Dr Bardens began legal proceedings in late 2013 to get the €100,000 in prize money. The Ravensburg district court ruled in favour of Dr David Bardens in March 2015. Dr Lanka appealed this court decision.
More Images for the missconception calles VIRUS dr. Stephan LankaDr. Stefan Lanka 2020 Article Busts the Virus Misconceptionhttps://truthcomestolight.com/2020/07/23/dr-stefan-lanka-2020-article-busts-the-virus-misconception/
Dr. Stefan Lanka's 2020 Article Busts the Virus Misconceptionhttps://thegnmsolution.com/dr-stefan-lankas-2020-article-busts-the-virus-misconception-2/
The virus misconception is at the heart of Operation Coronavirus, because without the concept of germ theory and without the horror story of the killer virus, Dr. Stefan Lanka's 2020 Article Busts the Virus Misconception - The GNM Solution
FREE PDF.
Misinterpretation of Virus - L.O.V.E.
Productionshttps://www.loveproductions.org/english/articles/misinterpretation-of-virus/
The Misconception called Virus (part 1), by Dr. Stefan Lanka. Paper-Virus-Lanka-002.pdf. Adobe Acrobat Dokument 1.6 MB. Download. Misinterpretation of Virus II - beginning and end of the corona crisis, by Dr. Stefan Lanka. Misinterpretation virus part 2.pdf. Adobe Acrobat Dokument 4.1 MB. Download This article is also available in Spanish language.
Dr. Stefan Lanka: The history of the infection theory ...https://davidicke.com/2020/07/09/dr-stefan-lanka-the-history-of-the-infection-theory-english-transcript/
Original video "Grippepandemie und Tamiflu" copy here. Dokuments: klein-klein-media.de Translation from German and original subtitled video: Sacha Dobler, AbruptEarthChanges.com 1.08 [time markers of the video] My name is Stefan Lanka, I am a biologist and virologist. I discovered the first virus, which was in the ocean. That's how I became involved in this matter.
Dr.Stefan Lanka | How Accurate Is The Coronavirus Test ...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CivT_e9EELQ
Is the coronavirus test valid? Does it work? Does it show the amount of the so called viruses in your body? Let's find out! Dr. Stefan Lanka explains the whole situation in a simple and scientific ...
Dr. Stefan Lanka: The history of the infection theory
...https://abruptearthchanges.com/2017/11/17/dr-stefan-lanka-the-history-of-the-infection-theory/
Original video "Grippepandemie und Tamiflu" copy here. Dokuments: klein-klein-media.de Translation from German and original subtitled video: Sacha Dobler, AbruptEarthChanges.com 1.08 [time markers of the video] My name is Stefan Lanka, I am a biologist and virologist. I discovered the first virus, which was in the ocean. That's how I became involved in this matter.
Biologist Proves Measles Isn't A Virus, Wins Supreme Court
...https://www.preventdisease.com/news/17/012717_Biologist-Proves-Measles-Isnt-Virus-Wins-Supreme-Court-Case.shtml
German biologist Dr. Stefan Lanka initially offered 100,000 euros to anyone who could provide scientific evidence that the measles virus existed. He had initially been ordered to pay up in court after Doctor David Bardens attempted to claim the prize after providing the biologist with a study that had been published in a medical journal.PDF
DismanTling The virus Theory -
WissenschafftPlushttps://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/Dismantling-the-Virus-Theory.pdf
Author: Dr. Stefan Lanka Scientists must question everything and especially what they love the most, i.e. their own discoveries and ideas. This basic rule of scientific research helps avoid erroneous developments and reveals the ones that already exist. Also, we must all be allowed to question the status quo, otherwise we would live in a ...
2Dr Stefan Lanka Debunks Pictures of "Isolated Viruses
...https://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/dr-stefan-lanka-debunks-pictures-of-isolated-viruses/
Dr. Stefan Lanka, virologist and molecular biologist, is internationally mostly known as an "AIDS dissident" (and maybe "gentechnology dissident") who has been questioning the very existence of "HIV" since 1994. In the past years, however, he stumbled over a breathtaking fact: Not even ONE of the (medically relevant) viruses has ever been isolated; there is […]
Virologist Dr Stefan Lanka Who Won A Court Case Over The
...https://darrellhines.net/2020/07/04/virologist-dr-stefan-lanka-who-won-a-court-case-over-the-non-existence-of-the-measles-virus-files-charge-against-german-government-virologist-for-corona-for-crimes/
Virologist Dr Stefan Lanka Who Won A Court Case Over The Non-Existence Of The 'Measles Virus' Files Charge Against German 'Government Virologist For Corona' For Crimes Against Humanity THERE IS NO PROVEN SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE THAT ANY VIRUS CAUSES ANY DISEASE!
Dr Stefan Lanka - Whalewhale.to/a/lanka_h.html
Dr Stefan Lanka [back] AIDS critics Viral fear racket. See: Dr. Karl Krafeld Jim West [2017 Jan] Anti-Vaxxer Biologist Stefan Lanka Bets Over $100K Measles Isn't A Virus; He Wins In German Federal Supreme Court By prophylactic vaccination of adults and especially children against measles, the pharmaceutical industry has earned Billions over a 40-year period.
Petition · 'Pathogenic' viruses do not exist · Change.orghttps://www.change.org/p/pathogenic-viruses-do-not-exist
The virus Dr Stefan Lanka discovered is called the Ectocarpus siliculosus virus. This virus is not pathogenic and enables the sea algae to thrive because of it, and not despite it. The diameter of this virus is approximately 120nm (nm - nano-meter - one billionth of a meter).
Dr. Stefan Lanka Exposes The "Viral Fraud"whale.to/a/lanka5.html
[The German original of the following text by Stefan Lanka you can find here (temporarily not available for technical reasons, Jan 11, 2003)] All these photos have in common that they, resp. the authors, can´t claim that they present a virus, as long as they do not also provide the original publications which describe how and what from the virus has been isolated.
Anti-Vaxxer Biologist Stefan Lanka Bets Over $100K Measles ...https://anonhq.com/anti-vaxxer-biologist-stefan-lanka-bets-100k-measles-isnt-virus-wins-german-federal-supreme-court/
by Dr. Stefan Lanka. The Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has ruled in the measles virus trial. The First Civil Senate of the BGH has confirmed the judgment by the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart (OLG) of the 16 February 2016.
The virus misconception is at the heart... - German New ...https://www.facebook.com/GermanNewMedicine/posts/3739588672723678
Dr. Stefan Lanka's 2020 Article Busts the Virus Misconception - The GNM Solution of Operation Coronavirus, because without the concept of germ theory and without the horror story of the killer virus, most people would not buy the
HIV/AIDS denialism - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan_Lanka
HIV/AIDS denialism is the belief, contradicted by conclusive evidence, that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) does not cause acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Some of its proponents reject the existence of HIV, while others accept that HIV exists but argue that it is a harmless passenger virus and not the cause of AIDS. Insofar as they acknowledge AIDS as a real disease, they ...
HIV & AIDS - Interview Stefan Lankahttps://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/mcinterviewsl.htm
INTERVIEW STEFAN LANKA Challenging BOTH Mainstream and Alternative AIDS Views. By Mark Gabrish Conlan. Zenger's Dec. 1998. While most people in the U.S. and Western Europe go right on believing that the so-called Human Immunodeficiency Virus [HIV] is the sole cause of AIDS, debate rages even within the alternative AIDS community over whether HIV exists at all.
How are viruses discovered and identified in the first
...https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/02/18/how-are-viruses-discovered-and-identified-in-the-first-place/
So, with the virus cover story, Wellcome was never held accountable for the damage "poppers" did to the immune systems of these gay men, and they were able to make billions off of AZT. Also, Dr. Banks also talked about problems with testing, and how a person could test positive for HIV in Africa, then go to Australia and test negative.
Prove the existence of Coronavirus! | Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/notes/tracey-northern/prove-the-existance-of-coronavirus/10157170035063865/
Dr Lanka refused to pay up because the papers did not prove the existence of the measles virus. Dr Bardens began legal proceedings in late 2013 to get the €100,000 in prize money. The Ravensburg district court ruled in favour of Dr David Bardens in March 2015. Dr Lanka appealed this court decision.
🌸